Balsillie puts in $212.5 mil offer for the Coyotes

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you seriously believe that the league doesn't need penetration into the 4th and 6th largest markets in the US for a national TV deal, you're crazy. Atlanta, for that matter is #10.

And since the NHL had a contract with those teams, how did that work out? How long should weak franchises be propped up for a pipe dream? Doesn't it make more sense to have teams in HOCKEY markets and grow it from there?
 
Just give the guy a damn team. Its obvious that it isnt working in Phoenix. Here we have a guy that is excited about hockey, has wanted a team for a long time, and wants to put a team in an established market, i dont see the problem.
 
That has zero to do with national TV contracts. If you go to a network, and want them to pay hundreds of millions for a TV contract, yet you have no penetration of your product into 4 of the 10 largest markets in the country, they're going to laugh in your face, and walk away.

Just like they do now.
 
Hockey fans should be rooting for us, not asking us to leave. Without us, the NHL's market shrinks. That's a fact. Moving the team to Canada does not allow growth within the league! Stop assuming that! People living in Hamilton are already hockey fans, so giving them a team only makes them fans of that team instead of Toronto or Buffalo or whoever. The NHL does not gain fans with the Coyotes moving from Phoenix, it only loses fans. Moving the team to Canada is a lateral move at best and you people wonder why the NHL is stepping in to try and save our franchise? Really? Next time you have a thought about our team, just let it go.

Then move the team to another US city that will work better than Phoenix.
Losing $30M a year doesn't sound like it's working.

I get tired of the rhetoric on both sides of the argument, but I get even more tired of hearing how great Phoenix is as a hockey market despite the glaring fact that it's bleeding money and is consistently in the bottom 5 for attendance.

Twelve diehard fans on a message board aren't going to convince me that Phoenix is a hockey hotbed waiting to explode. It's been 12 years, a move to Glendale, a new building and it's still not working.

Unless the league forces Washington and Pittsburgh to give Crosby and Ovechkin to the Yotes, nothing will save this franchise.

Just like they do now.

Touche.
Doesn't anyone realize how much money the NHL contract is worth in Canada? It's insane.
Add 1 or more Canadian teams and it goes up.

You could put an NHL team in every major city in the US and it won't affect the US TV deal one iota.
In fact, since we've expanded and moved so many teams around, the value of a national deal has gone down.
We're off of ESPN, Fox and ABC and our only national broadcast comes from NBC where we split profits with them. It's essentially a free deal.

Anyone who can't see that slamming the sport down the US's throat isn't working is either ignorant or blind.
 
And since the NHL had a contract with those teams, how did that work out? How long should weak franchises be propped up for a pipe dream? Doesn't it make more sense to have teams in HOCKEY markets and grow it from there?

How has the NHL propped up Washington and San Jose? Those teams are thriving right now.

And no, it doesn't make more sense to have teams in hockey markets and grow it from there. The NHL already has penetration into those markets. It needs to grow its penetration into non-hockey markets in order to bring more value to its product nationally. That's how the NFL is able to have a multi-billion dollar TV contract, and why they're the #1 league in the country, and arguably the world.

If you're starting up a brand new hockey league, that's the only scenario where it makes sense to only focus on hockey markets.
 
How has the NHL propped up Washington and San Jose? Those teams are thriving right now.

And no, it doesn't make more sense to have teams in hockey markets and grow it from there. The NHL already has penetration into those markets. It needs to grow its penetration into non-hockey markets in order to bring more value to its product nationally. That's how the NFL is able to have a multi-billion dollar TV contract, and why they're the #1 league in the country, and arguably the world.

If you're starting up a brand new hockey league, that's the only scenario where it makes sense to only focus on hockey markets.

The NFL can draw from ANYWHERE in the US, there's no such thing as a "non-football market" in the country. You're comparing apples and oranges here.
 
Hockey fans should be rooting for us, not asking us to leave. Without us, the NHL's market shrinks. That's a fact. Moving the team to Canada does not allow growth within the league! Stop assuming that! People living in Hamilton are already hockey fans, so giving them a team only makes them fans of that team instead of Toronto or Buffalo or whoever. The NHL does not gain fans with the Coyotes moving from Phoenix, it only loses fans. Moving the team to Canada is a lateral move at best and you people wonder why the NHL is stepping in to try and save our franchise? Really? Next time you have a thought about our team, just let it go.

Despite the fact i am highly in favour of the team moving to S.Ont for the good of the league, this is a really good point. I'd love to see the debate on this point

Then again, the fans that will be "lost" are for the most part lukewarm (I know there are actual hockey fans in Phoenix, but not enough to carry a team as the numbers show). And while the NHL wouldn't be gaining fans in Hamilton, the fans they have their would be fanatical enough to support the team financially.

Personally, i think it sucks Hamilton and Phoenix can't both have a team. I've never been a fan of markets losing teams (i'm still bitter over the mass exodus out of Atlantic Canada by the AHL in the 90s), but Hamilton has fans who would support the team, and an owner whose willing to bankroll it. Phoenix has neither it seems. If we had to choose between the two, i'd say Hamilton would be the best move.

I think there's still life for hockey in Phoenix, they just have to find their niche. Maybe if they lose the Yotes, give them Hamilton's AHL team and see how that works? In the example i gave above for Atlantic Canada, the region that lost AHL has regained it's hockey footing with QMJHL franchises, which until recently have drawn some fo the largest crowds in the league and have acheived much success (. Crowds that i believe were larger than their AHL followings (but i'd need to double-check).
 
Why does all of this seem to come down to the US v Canada? If Hamilton, Toronto or Portland ownership groups put together the best package, the NHL needs to take it. It has nothing to do with either country. It's about the business and whether or not the market exists to support a team AND how to grow the NHL.

I think there are a lot of fans in Canada who love to see a team in Portland and Seattle. The first two professional franchises in the US were the Portland Rosebuds and the Seattle Metropolitans, Seattle even won the cup in 1917. Both cities also have major junior franchises. But ultimately it's up to the fans in both of those cities to fight for their chance.
 
http://www.glendaleaz.com/pressroom/

City of Glendale statement on Coyotes/bankruptcy filing
The decision by the ownership of the Phoenix Coyotes to initiate bankruptcy proceedings without consultation or approval of the National Hockey League (NHL) is an unfortunate turn of events for the NHL, the State of Arizona and the Coyotes’ loyal fans. Even as the propriety of this unprecedented action is being thoroughly investigated by the NHL, city officials are working diligently to ensure that the public’s interest is fully protected throughout this process. The City appreciates the decision by the NHL to assume control of the Coyotes and we are confident that every effort will be made to honor all contractual commitments. It is our hope that the NHL action will provide immediate stability to the franchise and allow the Coyotes to remain an important part of the Arizona community.
 
How has the NHL propped up Washington and San Jose? Those teams are thriving right now.

No they're not. San Jose might be alright, but Washington still loses money. Ted Leonisis admitted as much just this year.

But the value of his franchise is up, which was the sole reason for the lockout and the current CBA.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...victory-boosts-turnaround-for-capitals/print/

Team officials said the club likely still will lose money this season regardless of how far the Capitals go in the playoffs.
 
Canada has some bad hockey teams at the moment and none of them are drawing like the Islanders.

No, Canada doesn't have any teams that are bad like the Islanders have been bad for two decades.

Toronto is consistently mediocre, and it's a special case anyway. The Oilers only missed the playoffs by a little bit. And this is the first time in ages that Ottawa has missed the playoffs. All the other Canadian teams made the playoffs.

Canada doesn't have any teams that are frequently in the basement of the standings. If, say, Ottawa or Edmonton had a stretch of bad seasons like the Islanders (or for that matter, Coyotes) have had, I'm quite sure that they would struggle for attendance as well.
 
The NFL can draw from ANYWHERE in the US, there's no such thing as a "non-football market" in the country. You're comparing apples and oranges here.

You're completely missing the point. The point is that in order to be a successful North American sports league, the NHL needs a national TV contract. They could simply not survive with only a regional penetration. If you want the league to fold, then, by all means, forget about "non-hockey" markets and concentrate only on Canada and the northeast.
 
Why does everyone mention Seattle as a relocation site?


It's the state of Washington and its business practices that put/pushed the Sonics out of Seattle, Flyers Fan Forever, not to mention Paul Allen owns the franchises there the NFL Seahawks and the Sounders, who happen to play in Qwest, that's why Portland, Oregon is not an option for hockey, not in this economic state we're in...

Seattle is not happening. They bid the Sonics farewell, the Yotes are not going there.
 
How will he get the sufficient votes from the BOG to move the team?

The Canadian teams don't want another team in Canada because that means that they will get less national coverage especially on HNIC.

Nashville, Pittsburgh and Minnesota will not vote for him due to past history.

Buffalo and Detroit will not vote for him.

The southern US teams may just say screw you to Balsillie and his Canadian dreams.

That's 12-14 votes down the drain.

Good Luck.

Actually, Jim Balsillie in the last year has been hanging out with Eugene Melnyk and George Gillette (sitting in those owners private boxes) You don't think that Balsillie hasn't been out meeting other owners and talking to them?

For your arguments about the Southern US teams, I propose it's the opposite from your scenerio. Once Balsillie has his team then those teams won't need to worry about Balsillie buying their team.
 
No they're not. San Jose might be alright, but Washington still loses money. Ted Leonisis admitted as much just this year.

But the value of his franchise is up, which was the sole reason for the lockout and the current CBA.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...victory-boosts-turnaround-for-capitals/print/
Yes, the "Washington Capitals" lose money, but Uncle Ted does not. He gets a percentage of the revenues from the Verizon Center concessions, rent, etc., but not a majority percentage. WSE owns a controlling share of Verizon Center and the Wizards. Once Ted gets a hold of those (he's contracted with Abe Pollin to do so), the VC concessions and such will be added to the Caps' bottom line.
 
Despite the fact i am highly in favour of the team moving to S.Ont for the good of the league, this is a really good point. I'd love to see the debate on this point

Then again, the fans that will be "lost" are for the most part lukewarm (I know there are actual hockey fans in Phoenix, but not enough to carry a team as the numbers show). And while the NHL wouldn't be gaining fans in Hamilton, the fans they have their would be fanatical enough to support the team financially.

Personally, i think it sucks Hamilton and Phoenix can't both have a team. I've never been a fan of markets losing teams (i'm still bitter over the mass exodus out of Atlantic Canada by the AHL in the 90s), but Hamilton has fans who would support the team, and an owner whose willing to bankroll it. Phoenix has neither it seems. If we had to choose between the two, i'd say Hamilton would be the best move.

I think there's still life for hockey in Phoenix, they just have to find their niche. Maybe if they lose the Yotes, give them Hamilton's AHL team and see how that works? In the example i gave above for Atlantic Canada, the region that lost AHL has regained it's hockey footing with QMJHL franchises, which until recently have drawn some fo the largest crowds in the league and have acheived much success (. Crowds that i believe were larger than their AHL followings (but i'd need to double-check).

The minor league team Roadrunners already failed, so chances are the Bulldogs will also.

I understand his argument that by putting another team in Hamilton won't help expand the sport. But lets face facts. It's not going to happen.
At this point, and in this economy, it's about making money. And that's not happening with a team in Phoenix. Hell, the current owners are owed tens of millions of dollars for keeping the Coyotes in the league.
NHL owners are sports fans, but they're still businessmen. And how does it make sense, with dollars and cents, to keep a team in the league that has a pathetic fan following and needs the league to pay for expenses like travel, commentators or players salaries?

I'd be in favor of this move if the team was going to another US city. Phoenix is simply not a good hockey market. Plain and simple. The numbers don't lie.
 
To be blunt: many of us in Canada don't particularly want or care for the NHL to grow in the southern United States, especially when it has meant sacrificing our own teams for the sake of the almighty American dollar.

If that makes me a spiteful Canadian NHL fan, so be it.

I love the diplomacy here. Good stuff. We only want to be included in this great game but you prefer to shun us? Brilliant marketing ploy my friend, just brilliant. What's next? Get rid of all the teams in the U.S. and put them in Canada? I can't wait...

That's great that Northern transplants help to build your hockey "base" down there. You have a couple rinks and a few programs, good for you. You're still nowhere close to the level of competition and interest for the game that there is up North. You'll never reach that point. But hey, a Peewee A team winning some games means that you've arrived apparently!

The attendance (or lack thereof) and inability to garner a true fanbase makes Phoenix that much less viable as a hockey market. The NHL isn't gaining jacksh*t for fans by placing a team in Phoenix, but by moving a team back to Canada they substitute a weak, failed market for proven success. The league is filled with teams losing money hand-over-fist, and when things don't work out then it's time to look back to where the game thrives and where you know the support will be.

Southern Ontario is an untapped gem when it comes to another NHL franchise. Millions of people with expendable income (even during this economic recession) who want to see hockey games. When it comes to the Leafs, it's a 20+ year wait for season tickets. That's A LOT of potential butts in the seats of an arena in Hamilton, Mississauga, Toronto, Kitchener/Waterloo, etc. Does Phoenix offer the same promise in terms of an established hockey following and the potential to be an annual hit at the gate? Not a chance.

Face it, the Sun Belt expansion maneuver is over. Some teams caught Lightning in a Bottle (pun intended, see: Tampa), and some found a bit of a niche in a growing region with little professional sports identity (see: Raleigh, NC and the Carolina Hurricanes). Others, like your Coyotes, are stuck with declining interest and nothing tangible to show for all the years of investment and parading "hockey in the South." It's a lost cause.

Do you hear yourself as you type? I'm giving you examples of how hockey, as a sport, is growing in Arizona and you patronize me? How bitter are you, honestly? So Winnipeg lost their team, get over it. It's been 13 years, just let it go.

You can make all the arguments you want, but the real fact of the matter is, moving a team to Canada will be a lateral move for the NHL, period. More butts in seats? For the first few years maybe. Then what happens when they start losing or people lose interest in a Hamilton team? They go somewhere else, possibly to the same team they watched for years.

Stop assuming that there are no hockey fans in Arizona. Just stop. It takes time to build a fan base. The Leafs have that long line of season ticket holders BECAUSE THEY WERE PART OF THE ORIGINAL SIX. How long have those teams had to build a rabid fan base? Now compare it to our timeline. One of these things is not like the other...

There are a few things pretty evident and most of the posts in this thread and the other ones devoted to Sunbelt NHL teams:

We have pretty strong evidence that NHL Hockey doesn't work in Phoenix. The Coyotes filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy yesterday. Phoenix has not been able to support the team well enough to survive. I think what we know is that RIGHT NOW, Phoenix probably is not viable.

Why do most posters see the NHL as some sort of zero sum game? Why is it impossible to add Canadian teams while growing the game in the US beyond the original 6 and second 6 cities?

Why does all of this seem to come down to the US v Canada? If Hamilton, Toronto or Portland ownership groups put together the best package, the NHL needs to take it. It has nothing to do with either country. It's about the business and whether or not the market exists to support a team AND how to grow the NHL.

Hockey fans need to pull their heads out of their butts and look around. Everyone should want the same thing, the business success of the game so we can all enjoy it.

First of all, this whole chapter 11 filing is still going through the hearing process. Moyes, a scum bag, filed it behind the NHL's back. It's not a fair assessment to go from "NHL team files for bankruptcy so therefore hockey doesn't work in the state." That's narrow-minded. Hockey is thriving BECAUSE of the Coyotes existence in the state. Without them, we wouldn't even have travel teams. But according to some posters, our lack of talent makes us a less viable candidate for a hockey franchise or some other nonsense.

It's not U.S. vs. Canada. It only appears that way BECAUSE of the Canadian media. I don't want my team to move, period. I don't care if it's to Portland, K.C., Hamilton, or Brazil. I don't want them to leave my state.

I love your last statement though. "...so we can all enjoy it." Well except for people not in Canada, people in the southwest, or people with bad teams, correct? Beautiful words.
 
Just a question as you're clearly more in the know: Do you think Moyes and Balsillie have gotten some sort of legal advice that makes them think they have a realistic chance here or do you think they ade a massive mistake?
I have serious doubts about the legal advice that Balsillie has been receiving. I have done a great many JV deals, and his tactics are nothing short of ludicrous.

His PR is no better. A WEBSITE as the centerpiece of his hastily arranged press conference? A request for support from the public? :laugh:

That being said, JB has nothing to lose. This may very well be a lark for him. It is almost as if he enjoys being an agent provateur.
 
Why did he do that though? My guess is that he was looking to lose significantly in sticking with the NHL's plan for him.

It appears he was under the belief he was about to be stripped of the team, which would be sold on the cheap to Reinsdorf. I don't really blame him if his story is true.
 
Comments fro GB and Paul Kelly:

http://tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=277750

"I don't know whether or not he could get approved," Bettman said Wednesday during a discussion of commissioners from the four major U.S. pro sports leagues, sponsored by The Wall Street Journal. "That's, as I said, something I don't get a vote on. If in fact it becomes an issue for board consideration, the board of governors of the league will make that decision."

...

Bettman said the filing occurred "not because creditors were lurking and seeking redress for not being paid, but because there was an offer apparently from Mr. Balsillie to buy the franchise and move it."

"This is not about whether or not we want a franchise in southern Ontario. This is not about whether or not Mr. Balsillie would make a suitable owner that the owners would approve. This is about the league's rules and the enforceability of our rules," Bettman said.

"Whether or not Mr. Moyes even had the authority to file the bankruptcy petition is something we're going to get into. This is more about the tactic and I think a challenge to league rules than it is about economic condition of the club, which we believe can with new ownership and with the accommodations the city of Glendale is prepared to make, we think can succeed."

...

"We generally try to avoid relocating franchises unless you absolutely have to," he said. "We think when a franchise is in trouble, you try and fix the problems. That's what we did in Pittsburgh and Ottawa and Buffalo prior to our work stoppage. That's what we did when the perception was that five out of the six Canadian franchises around the turn of the century were in trouble. We fixed the problems. We don't run out on cities."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That being said, JB has nothing to lose. This may very well be a lark for him. It is almost as if he enjoys being an agent provateur.

LOL! That's my impression as well.
I think he loves just stirring the pot and ticking these guys off. Probably almost as much as he wants an NHL team.

I agree that his methods of getting one haven't exactly been kosher. He's probably going to pay for it in the end regardless if this ploy is successful.
 
That being said, JB has nothing to lose. This may very well be a lark for him. It is almost as if he enjoys being an agent provateur.

I think so. Whether he ultimately gets a team or not, I think that Balsillie enjoys being a sort of Canadian folk hero. A Robin Hood robbing from the rich and sticking it to the evil Gary Bettman, and giving to the poor exploited Canadian hockey fans.

There's no other reason for his ridiculous PR stunts. Selling season tickets for a team he hadn't even made an offer to buy. Creating an online petition to somehow affect a process that would play out in bankruptcy court.

If Balsillie were really serious, the PR he should be concerned about is with the Board of Governors, not the Canadian public. All the public sentiment in the world isn't going to help him get a hockey team. He needs to play politics with the BoG, not PR with the media. But i think he likes cultivating a certain public image of himself.

Edit:

Case in point:

Can we please make Jim Balsillie's birthday a national holiday.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad