Northern Dancer
The future ain't what it used to be.
In all fairness, Doug MacLean was not an owner. I assume he was vetted because he was the Governor.
Wasn't he part of the group that bought Tampa Bay? (and dropped out I think wisely)
In all fairness, Doug MacLean was not an owner. I assume he was vetted because he was the Governor.
Who's to say that if relocation is thrown open, the "best" deal might not be with KC?
You need to inform yourself better about the timeline. By the time Boots came around, the deal to buy the Preds had already been agreed upon. Boots was simply a replacement to additional bank funding.
I agree with a lot of what you've said. But Oakland and Atlanta have roots in baseball. They always have.
The same can't be said for Phoenix. I don't know if it'll ever be a good place for hockey. Kids don't grow up playing it and most adults don't even understand it.
I don't like how the fans in Phoenix might be losing their team. It's no different than what happened to the smattering of baseball fans Montreal had.
But at some point, it becomes too clear that some sports aren't welcome in certain towns.
I wish the relocation could have been done in some other way as well. But it is, what it is. And I think as long as someone has the means to move it, you might as well do it.
I'm glad you have nothing to do with the league...just sayin.
Whoever the poster was that stated that most of the time the judge is hardest on the side that is winning, give yourself a cookie.
I can see this being the end result.
do you think after 12 years losing money and no end in sight JBs lawyers wont find that one easy to take out though sems like its pretty tough now and really how as an owner would i consent to losing money when someones willing to step in who will convert loss to profit i see this as maybe Bettmans end because he will likely have owners who are not making great money now saying where does this come from my equalization money in revenue sharing pool just shrunk or rich teams having to pay alot more either way this is no simple situation and i se Gb as roasted now
I wonder how happy the other NHL owners would be to shell out more cash for a dying franchise?
Well, I'd argue that Oakland/Atlanta's existence in MLB is relatively short compared to most (got teams in 1966-68).
I'd also put forth that LA, Tampa, San Jose, and Carolina are doing well and they don't have a hockey culture (see my hockey culture assimilation thoughts here: http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=639729&page=14 )
I'd also put forth that Montreal was doing pretty well with MLB for a while, but got screwed over by TWO work stoppages and a drug scandal.
But that's irrelevant.
Nope. Incorrect. Boots could not make that happen. The team could. Short of all of the other shareholders going more or less bankrupt, Boots was never going to control the team.Boots did have some sort of clause which would allow him to move the team if it didn't meet it's marks though, so he wasn't an afterthought.
At the same time, I wonder if Ballsillie would even care about this.
So what if the NHL says '$100M to move the team to Hamilton'.
He'd probably happily fork over the cash.
In all fairness, Doug MacLean was not an owner. I assume he was vetted because he was the Governor.
That would be me. And it's a good cookie
Coyotes live blog:
Balsillie's lawyer believes that the NHL is blocking any team to go to Hamilton. Judge counters with has anything prior to this ever been submitted for it. Balsillie's lawyer responds no.
Yeah, because he's still saving $200 million.
If he was willing to get Hamilton a team at any cost, you've got hockey arena plans
and a willing owner (Jerry Bruckheimer) in Las Vegas. He could easily have put together his Copps deal and a proposal for a 32-team league that solves some alignment issues in the process.
For JB, it always has been about getting a $500 million asset in Hamilton for $200-$300 million by poaching another franchise.
Would the league agree to take over that arena lease?
Those are excellent arguments.
But TB and Carolina have won cups and SJ has been one of the best teams in the last few years.
Phoenix is in a tough bind. They're on the bubble for making the playoffs, and while they have some great young talent, they might not be ready to push for a serious playoff run for another few seasons. Who knows if the team can survive until that happens.
NHL says Reinsdorf bid is in writing but not submitted due to privacy reasons
Right now, who do you guys believe has the best arguments ?