Why would that make any difference?it's clear that the Chiclets guys didn't even consider the fact that Babs might get fired for this
Why would that make any difference?it's clear that the Chiclets guys didn't even consider the fact that Babs might get fired for this
You're both using quite outdated terminology. You're both wrong to varied degrees.
I mean when we were younger addresses and phone numbers where in the phone book lolI’m not even that old. I’m 38 and it’s shocking to me how little those younger than me care about privacy. It’s utterly shocking at times.
You can learn to be a quasi-psychopath. Just ask any lawyer, real estate agent, or car salesman. There isn't an iota of nastiness when they talk to you face-to-face but none of their communication is ever in truly good faith.You're talking about a minority of type 2's and generalizing them as the norm. Most psychopaths, the great majority of them, are too impulsive to rule anyone. If they do, it's short lived.
Not the people I hung around with in Bensonhurst.I mean when we were younger addresses and phone numbers where in the phone book lol
Why would that make any difference?
I had to google that , people in New York didn't get phone books?Not the people I hung around with in Bensonhurst.
You can learn to be a quasi-psychopath. Just ask any lawyer, real estate agent, or car salesman. There isn't an iota of nastiness when they talk to you face-to-face but none of their communication is ever in truly good faith.
Politicians basically have to disconnect from reality and put on a persona for the public. Many also have law degrees.
Those are the psychos that never will be studied.
Not that...some the the more, shall we say, colorful neighborhood fellas didnt want to be found until they found who they wanted to findNot the people I hung around with in Bensonhurst.
Which has always been wild to me. You'd think with the way we teach our kids about being accountable for your actions, that it'd carry over to adulthood. But instead, people want to dodge accountability and pass the blame onto something else. Even in this thread, I saw people shitting on Biz for saying what he heard, instead of shitting on the fact that Babcock clearly has a reputation of doing suspect psychological warfare on his players.We live in a shoot-the-messenger society where people base their judgments more on who said it rather than what the message actually is.
IMO - there is a fundamental difference between "cancellation" for having an unpopular opinion versus personal actions.That was for the crowd accusing them of trying to "cancel" Babs. They didn't care if he was fired or not. They did make it clear Babs has been doing this for a long time so guess it finally caught up to him.
Well, they didn't go to the management which meant that the management didn't know. Maybe they need to work on that, but either way in this particular instance one can't really expect them to throw the head coach under the bus only based on podcast rumors. First the leading players came out saying that they didn't have a problem with the coach, only after it emerged that some younger players apparently did have a problem. Once things became clear Babcock was out and Jarmo apologized to the players.In fact, there's a fantastic argument that if the players didn't go to Biz, this would've just got swept under the rug one way or another given Davidson and Kekkalainen's lacklustre response to this whole debacle. I don't understand why people don't focus on this enough.
With Franzen his response was basically, he was hurt by the allegation, because "nobody's done as much in mental health than me," because he did Bell let's talk.Has Babcock ever commented on his allegations? Franzen, Modano, etc?
I think Babcock is one of those people that's been in such a high position for so long that he's lost the ability to gauge what is "normal" social behavior because nobody just points anything out to him. Whether people are afraid of retribution or, maybe ownership or management, they have a vested interest in ignoring it or just putting up with it. So maybe he was just a little peculiar to start with and now after decades he's just.. really, really offputting.
Why should they even care?Why would that make any difference?
Source me, I'm not going to argue this because I really don't have any idea but some of what you're saying is contrary to any information I can find onlineI don't have it backwards. The problem here is you're using a minority segment. Most psychopaths are convicted of violent crimes. They number in a few dozen millions worldwide. They are impulsive, have aggressive and violent behaviors. That's the norm for psychopaths.
In contrast, there are less than 3000 billionaires and I doubt the majority of them score as high as violent inmates.
I don't want to get too technical and talk about where the concensus are heading with the two main scores/types to diagnose psychopathy or antisocial behaviors in general. It's being pushed aside for more comprehensive categorizations based on both clinical diagnosis and neurobiological markers. The old model made it about nature vs nurture, which muddied diagnosis, because there's just too much overlap in determining factors and a wide range of different development paths. There's also the question of gene expression. Anyway, I'm going too far. Just to say that all those things have been pushing aside this modelization over type 1 (genetic) vs type 2 (envr).
Those CEOs, they probably just do not score as high as inmates. The lack of impulsivity tells me they belong in type 2 in the old model. Even the old model states that type 1 (genetic) are more impulsive and type 2 are more anxious, which fits a lot more with a CEO, and also fits with anxious people scoring higher on average in IQ tests.
I’m not even that old. I’m 38 and it’s shocking to me how little those younger than me care about privacy. It’s utterly shocking at times.
Source me, I'm not going to argue this because I really don't have any idea but some of what you're saying is contrary to any information I can find online
I think this is an overreaction, but I also think Babcock continuing to ask these players to share personal photos with him after they were allegedly uncomfortable doing so suggests he still can’t read the room and may not be the type of coach you want anyway.
The Rehearsal is easily one of the most amazing shows I've ever seen.certainly was not expecting a Nathan Fielder meme in this thread. lol. Maybe this is a sign to get back into Nathan for You.
Different times.How did he last so long in Detroit?
I get he had success but it's surprising the entire room didn't turn against him there