I think the bolded is the issue honestly. What Tkachuk brings to the table is more than just points and the difference between what Tkachuk brings to the table pver Kyrou when they're not on the scoresheet is much more than a "slight edge" in the minds of Sens fans.
You're entitled to your opinion of course but every Sens fan who has posted in this thread has basically agreed that Kyrou isn't an ideal starting point because he'd bring more of the same that the Senators already have. We're a fanbase who knows a thing or two about guys being able to produce offence while bringing very little value in other areas and moving what the Sens need (intensity, leadership, physicality) for someone who can produce roughly the same offence without bringing those intangibles isn't something this team needs as currently constructed.
If BT truly wants out that obviously changes the equation, especially if his trade protection kicks in and he's picking his destination. As of now that doesn't seem to be the case so Sens fans can be as picky as they want.
Thank you, this is a well thought out post that points out your objections with Kyrou being a trade piece. While I do agree that Tkachuk brings a little more value due to his intensity, leadership and physicality, I politely disagree that its more than a slight edge. Again there is nothing wrong with saying no thanks to Kyrou or valuing intangibles highly and reasonable people can disagree on how big a difference that places on value.