My first impression on the trade was disappointment that we only got 1x1 & 2x2 and not 2x1 and 1x2. Then I started to wonder … how much more valuable is a 13-14 pick versus the expected 25 pick from a top contender. I think
@rt was right on with stating BAs ask as two 25OA and one 50OA. So I went off looking for one of those draft valuation charts. After looking at several, I settled on the most recent and most realistic one IMO as the one from Sound of Hockey. Bigger numbers are better. In their chart 1OA gets a 1000. 32OA is down at 133, and they provide the value of every single position. So scoring 25, 25, 50 comes in at a total score of 325. That is what BA was asking for. The Ottawa deal as struck comes in at a notably better 440. That assumes 13-14 this year, 43OA for Washington 2nd next year, and 57OA from Ottawa in 2026. The LA offer using 24OA, 24OA, and 56OA comes in slightly behind Ottawa at 428. And we have heard that LA wanted us to take salary and/or Bjornfot for the 3rd asset and most are saying he is not a mid 2nd round value anymore. So I was being generous giving him a mid 2nd score.
After doing this exercise, it sure seems like BA exceeded his ask … No???
All that said, I am with
@Kai Yo T that I wanted more for one of our best players. But it does seem like BA exceeded his ask and did not come up short.