Why can't Matthews be productive 5 on 5 and on the PK like the players he's being compared to?
If we're arguing his stats are better because he can focus exclusively on 5v5 without draining energy on the PK, then we must accept his stats are inflated 5v5 vs players who play on the PK.
If the PK is draining, what would Marner be without being on the PK? A 120+ point guy? If so, get him off the PK. What about Crosby? A 150+ point player in his prime?
It's not a question of what he can or can't do or what his stats are, it's a question of what's best for the team and not all superstars play on the PK. Some do, some don't, that's the way it's always been and Matthews not being on the PK is a non-issue.
I’m not sure it’s on Treliving. Matthews holds all the power here, we can ask for him to lower his ask but whatever he says will go. Not a whole lot you can do outside of dealing him which is out of the question
Dubas had all the power during the RFA negotiations and screwed up historically. It’s a screw up so big we are paying for it now, 5 years later. I don’t consider the situations comparable
Exactly. Bending over for a pending UFA is one thing, it happens all the time and to some degree, it's standard operating procedure. Bending over for a RFA though, that's completely different and IMHO was the biggest and most obvious mistake Dubas made here.
Generational to what generation? He may not even be a HoF candidate.
All-time Leaf great though and eventually he'll take his rightful place among the slew of superstars we've seen over the years. Sittler and Salming, Daoust and Derlago, Ihnacak and Frycer, Damphousse and Marois, Gilmour and Clark, Sundin and Sullivan, Stajan and Blake, Kessel and Bozak, I could go on but IMO he's right up there with the best of them.
AM is not quite quick enough to kill penalties. Nylander, on the other hand, could be a PK machine.
This. Nylander has been so under utilized during his time here, I don't get it at all.
I actually think a 5 year term is great for the Leafs. Matthews will be 32 before the subsequent season begins. I don't know why he would want a 5 year contract though unless his agent thinks he's going to get a 7/8 year contract at 32 at a higher AAV than now because the cap will be that much higher.
If I had to pick between 5 and 8 years, I'd do 5. However, I don't think it makes sense for AM to sign for 5 years, it's a net benefit for the team. It's much more likely he wants to sign for 2-3 years, and then re-visit again at 29/30 with a higher cap.
IMO a 5 year term is fine, the numbers being thrown around on the other hand are insane. We'll see what happens.
As to which term I'd prefer, it all depends on the cap hit. With the cap going up, 13.5 for 8 years might not be so bad, risky but a risk you maybe have to take I guess. 13.5 for 3 years though is just gross. I suspect you're right - what he's aiming for is a short term deal and re-visit soon after to max out his earnings, we'll see.
Teams will make room for him it comes to it just like Teams will make room for McDavid if he becomes available
Depends on his ask. 13.5 on a short term deal, I doubt teams will be lining up for him at those rates, not after the season he just had.