I’m agreeing with you here and merely commenting further on Hughes and Pasta.
1. Hughes case has crumbled because the numbers are not quite there since the first quarter of the season.
He had 8 goals and 31 points in 20 games and led the league in scoring through November 23.
He has 4 goals and 42 points in 44 games since then and has slipped down to 14th in scoring.
Combine that with what everyone else has done since and as you correctly predicted, it’s easy to get lost in the shuffle. The way things are looking now, I see him finishing around 7th in Hart voting.
2. Pasta, another contender in my eyes for 6th or 7th in Hart voting, is going to have simple perception work against him, among other things.
Though the Bruins have done an admirable job staying near the top of the East and Pasta is going to post a similar point total as last season as the Hart runner up, it’s possible he misses potting 50 goals, let alone the 61 he had. The Bruins have also been rather ho-hum since around the same time previously mentioned Hughes led the league in scoring. Since racing out to a stunning 13-1-3 record, they’ve gone 23-12-12 record. They’ve collected those extra loss points, but they’ve won less than half their games over the past 3 1/2 months.
Again, compared to what others are doing, his case is lacking.
Hughes and Pasta have had collectively tremendous campaigns, but I don’t think they’re much of a threat at this point to place in the top 5.
If anything Pastrnak is alone on an island with McAvoy and Swayman.
Even Marchand is slowing offensively. Without Pastrnak this low result offense is even worse.
Top 5 is likely. He will not and should not win.
It’s not likely when the top 3 scorers, a 70 goal threat, and the likely Vezina winner are in the mix.
I understand the importance of Pasta and his contributions, but some of you guys just aren’t getting that the narrative and play from others is stronger.
Is 70 still possible for him? Would love to see that glass ceiling being shattered.
Thought CMD would get it but he stopped at 64.
He looks to be getting ready for the playoffs earlyIt's such a stupid feeling to have but I can't help it - I'm disappointed in Auston Matthews.
After last night's game - he's only on pace for 71 goals on the season. I really thought he'd push for 75, and at one point he seemed to be pushing for closer to 80 then 75.
If he ends up with "only" 70, let alone less then that at ~65-69, I'll be really disappointed.
Still hoping he can get hot again soon and strat piling them up, and increase his pace.
In the past couple of months - he had one stretch of 19 goals in 15 games, and a completely separate stretch of 17 goals in 15 games.
If he were to do 19 goals in his next 15 games - that'd put him on pace for 77 goals
If he were to do 17 goals in his next 15 games - that'd put him on pace for 75 goals
Nope.Is 70 still possible for him? Would love to see that glass ceiling being shattered.
Thought CMD would get it but he stopped at 64.
He's on pace for 71 goals right now, despite slowing down lately. Not only possible, but he's on pace for it.Is 70 still possible for him? Would love to see that glass ceiling being shattered.
Thought CMD would get it but he stopped at 64.
It's such a stupid feeling to have but I can't help it - I'm disappointed in Auston Matthews.
After last night's game - he's only on pace for 71 goals on the season. I really thought he'd push for 75, and at one point he seemed to be pushing for closer to 80 then 75.
If he ends up with "only" 70, let alone less then that at ~65-69, I'll be really disappointed.
Still hoping he can get hot again soon and strat piling them up, and increase his pace.
In the past couple of months - he had one stretch of 19 goals in 15 games, and a completely separate stretch of 17 goals in 15 games.
If he were to do 19 goals in his next 15 games - that'd put him on pace for 77 goals
If he were to do 17 goals in his next 15 games - that'd put him on pace for 75 goals
It's such a stupid feeling to have but I can't help it - I'm disappointed in Auston Matthews.
After last night's game - he's only on pace for 71 goals on the season. I really thought he'd push for 75, and at one point he seemed to be pushing for closer to 80 then 75.
If he ends up with "only" 70, let alone less then that at ~65-69, I'll be really disappointed.
Still hoping he can get hot again soon and strat piling them up, and increase his pace.
In the past couple of months - he had one stretch of 19 goals in 15 games, and a completely separate stretch of 17 goals in 15 games.
If he were to do 19 goals in his next 15 games - that'd put him on pace for 77 goals
If he were to do 17 goals in his next 15 games - that'd put him on pace for 75 goals
If mcdavid got injured next game you would 100 percent be preaching how he would have had 100 assists. A strike is a strike and a ball is a ballUltimately, that’s why the games have to be played. If he went down with an injury after having 52 goals in 55 games (56 team games), we would have had to listen until the end of time how he was pacing for perhaps the greatest goal scoring season ever. According to the pace arguments, he should have 59 goals right now rather than 54.
If mcdavid got injured next game you would 100 percent be preaching how he would have had 100 assists. A strike is a strike and a ball is a ball
Late reply I know, but while good he isn't winning a selke he could be considered generational by the end of his career if he wins some rockets along with the selke a few timesWeird that people don’t consider Matthews generational at this point. A two-way center like that who scores at nearly a goal per game… not enough secondary powerplay assists I suppose?