Offtheboard412
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2012
- 790
- 514
McDavid is better than Crosby
Mackinnon and Kucherov are both better than Malkin
Matthews and Ovechkin to this point are a wash
I can’t take HFboards posters opinions on Maple Leaf players seriously. Not many people are able (or care to) look beyond their hatred of the Leafs to be objective about a player.
Especially Matthews. I wish they didn’t lock the Stutzle v Matthews thread. People on this site legit thought Matthews had regressed to the mean as a 40 goal scorer. And then he goes out and does what he’s doing this year.
You likely aren’t able to judge a maple leaf player with any objectivity at all, so we don’t need to talk about any of them
McDavid’s first 7 years, compared to Crosby’s first 8 years (to get the number of games similar) shows that Crosby is further away from McDavid than Marner is to Crosby
I don’t care about era or adjusting stats. Everyone has the same chances to score.
If you’re looking at era, and this is another problem I have with the entire concept, you can’t just cherry pick years and try to make an argument about it. If it’s going to be an ‘era’ you have to take at least 8 or 10 years worth of data.
Single seasons mean nothing to the argument you’re trying to make, there is constant fluctuation in league scoring.
Match the league scoring to Gretzky and lemieux’s health issues, you need to factor in Gretzky’s back, what season did that happen?
And lemieuxs cancer diagnosis, when did that happen?
Mackinnon over Malkin is the most nonsensical take possible. There is literally zero argument for it. Kucherov might have an argument after this year. But most people will still have Malkin ahead