Auston Matthews 69 goals in 81 games, most goals scored since Lemieux in 1995-96

Offtheboard412

Registered User
Feb 26, 2012
790
514
McDavid is better than Crosby

Mackinnon and Kucherov are both better than Malkin

Matthews and Ovechkin to this point are a wash



I can’t take HFboards posters opinions on Maple Leaf players seriously. Not many people are able (or care to) look beyond their hatred of the Leafs to be objective about a player.

Especially Matthews. I wish they didn’t lock the Stutzle v Matthews thread. People on this site legit thought Matthews had regressed to the mean as a 40 goal scorer. And then he goes out and does what he’s doing this year.

You likely aren’t able to judge a maple leaf player with any objectivity at all, so we don’t need to talk about any of them



McDavid’s first 7 years, compared to Crosby’s first 8 years (to get the number of games similar) shows that Crosby is further away from McDavid than Marner is to Crosby



I don’t care about era or adjusting stats. Everyone has the same chances to score.



If you’re looking at era, and this is another problem I have with the entire concept, you can’t just cherry pick years and try to make an argument about it. If it’s going to be an ‘era’ you have to take at least 8 or 10 years worth of data.

Single seasons mean nothing to the argument you’re trying to make, there is constant fluctuation in league scoring.

Match the league scoring to Gretzky and lemieux’s health issues, you need to factor in Gretzky’s back, what season did that happen?

And lemieuxs cancer diagnosis, when did that happen?

Mackinnon over Malkin is the most nonsensical take possible. There is literally zero argument for it. Kucherov might have an argument after this year. But most people will still have Malkin ahead
 

CN8

Registered User
May 31, 2010
770
720
Canada
It’s funny how all the fans go after each other as if lifting one player up lowers another. Meanwhile at the ASG it looked like McDavid and Matthews get along quite well. Both push each other and are great for the game. Stuff like defensive play I get the debate but if you’re coming up with a way to discredit Matthews goal scoring that’s you not him
 

abo9

Registered User
Jun 25, 2017
9,154
7,275
One thing Ovechkin has that very few in the history of the league is durability and otherworldly consistency. he put up 40 and 50 goal seasons until age 36. Matthews won't have that durability and already has nagging wrist injuries that won't help him as he gets older. Even if Matthews PEAKS higher than Ovechkin goal scoring wise and beats 65 goals, he gas a hell of a hill to climb to get even 800 career goals. that's why Ovechkin stands alone as a goal scorer for me. been doing it since 2005 and has insane durability and consistency.

congrats to Matthews, great goal scorer and great accomplishment. he needs to round out his overall game to become a 100 point player to take that next step as a player IMO.

I hate Matthews as much as anyone, but he did have a 100 prs season already
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ted Hoffman

abo9

Registered User
Jun 25, 2017
9,154
7,275
Yup. Didn’t add that because I knew it would get peoples undies in a bunch.

The scoring era and “why just ES?” arguments will fly lol

Some people can’t stomach that matthews is the best goal scorer in a long time…and could be the best ever one day

When we start nitpicking about stuff like that is when we know the player is doing good stuff!

People cherry pick about Ovechkin being good on the PP and shooting a lot, like its not part of the game.

One thing I dont get, is why does Matthews struggle so much in the playoffs if hes so good ar ES? Not being snarky. The argument about Ovechkin being bad in the playoffs usually revolved around not enough PP in rhe playoffs!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Calderon

Strangle

Leafs Smol PP
May 4, 2009
9,757
6,997
So was talent better during WW2 also?

This is more in line with where I would understand why era adjusting would make some sort of sense.

If eras were separated into things like this

World war 2 - obviously different due to men going off to war

Post lockout and pre lockout - again obvious changes and differences here

But not where people take an outlier performance from a random year in 2022 and compare it to an outlier performance in a random year of 2013 (both post lockout) and make arguments based on league averages





You didn’t answer the question, I’m not reading someone else not answering the question. I want you to answer the question

Also, those articles aren’t written to answer my question
 

Strangle

Leafs Smol PP
May 4, 2009
9,757
6,997
Mackinnon over Malkin is the most nonsensical take possible. There is literally zero argument for it. Kucherov might have an argument after this year. But most people will still have Malkin ahead

Mackinnon still has a lot of road left in his career, there won’t be many by the end of it who would take Malkin over Mackinnon, imo

But I think he’s better than Malkin right now anyway
 

Wattsburgh

Registered User
Apr 3, 2023
526
289
It’s not really close, the Crosby era was the worst hockey that has existed in my life time

Talent was better before and talent is better after
Like it or not, Crosby and Ovechkin/Malkin created this new era of Hockey. They made others want to train harder / play better. Besides, even if his era sucked, there was still way more physicality / fights to play through compared to now. An invisible stat that shouldn’t be overlooked (goons trying to take your head off every night). Not much of that today. So I’d call it closer to even than you think.

It’s amazing how quick people are to forget once a few new shiny ponies show up. 4 out of 5 Cups between the three of them. How many has Matthews and McDavid won?

By the way, Crosby is still performing quite well in this era. Where’s your answer for that?

Bottom line there was way more toughness and bullying towards rookies in his era. And he absolutely shined.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: authentic
Dec 15, 2002
29,289
8,728
You didn’t answer the question, I’m not reading someone else not answering the question. I want you to answer the question
Actually, you didn't ask me the question. You asked that question to someone else and I thought I'd be helpful with links that have discussed both items (and have done so in pretty decent detail along with other information that's kind of pertinent to the discussion you were having), but
Also, those articles aren’t written to answer my question
Maybe learn how to distill information from something that's written, because the answers you're looking for are in all 3 of those threads along with some other information that might be important and it won't take more than about 3 minutes total to find both answers.

Or, quit being lazy and learn how to search on the internet and do your own research.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regal

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
26,420
11,412
If it makes AM look better, of course we do ;)

Lol the difference in scoring among top scorers between 1992-93 and now is bigger than when Ovechkin had his 65 goals. Like a Matthews season scoring 75 this season would be equivalent to around 90 back then.
 

cupface52

Registered User
Jan 12, 2008
4,439
667
Burlington, On
Lol the difference in scoring among top scorers between 1992-93 and now is bigger than when Ovechkin had his 65 goals. Like a Matthews season scoring 75 this season would be equivalent to around 90 back then.

Ovechkin had 25% more goals than second and 51% more than 5th. Matthews has 26% more than second, and 39% more than 5th. However, Ovechkin was also 30th in assists while Matthews just barely makes 100th.
 

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
26,420
11,412
Ovechkin had 25% more goals than second and 51% more than 5th. Matthews has 26% more than second, and 39% more than 5th. However, Ovechkin was also 30th in assists while Matthews just barely makes 100th.

Ovechkin spent like 20 more games of ice time on the powerplay. Matthews has almost as many even strength goals as anyone else has total goals, and he scores at a higher rate than Ovechkin on the powerplay and plays a thing called defense at even strength
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Neil Racki

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,746
9,983
Ovechkin had 25% more goals than second and 51% more than 5th. Matthews has 26% more than second, and 39% more than 5th. However, Ovechkin was also 30th in assists while Matthews just barely makes 100th.

Matthews’ season is still ongoing. I would hesitate to call judgment on final statistics versus a work in progress.

What I mean by that is, at a similar point in 2007-2008, this is what it looked like through 60 team games for Ovechkin.

IMG_0883.png


His lead over #2 was 20% and his lead over #5 was 41.

Not too different from Matthews who is partaking in his team’s 60th game as of this posting and has the leads you stated (he has an assist as of now).

As a curio, Ovechkin was 55th in assists on the date of that screenshot (2/19/08). Ultimately the difference between where Matthews is in assists right now in 2024 to being 55th in the league with a quarter of a season to go like Ovechkin of 2007-2008 is a handful (this holds true since a handful less would have Ovechkin barely in the top 100 at that particular time). That’s it.

So, let’s continue to have fun and compare, but also acknowledge that the dust will have to settle on a complete season before drawing any real conclusions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockey Outsider

cupface52

Registered User
Jan 12, 2008
4,439
667
Burlington, On
Ovechkin spent like 20 more games of ice time on the powerplay. Matthews has almost as many even strength goals as anyone else has total goals, and he scores at a higher rate than Ovechkin on the powerplay and plays a thing called defense at even strength

More powerplays with a lower PP% = higher pp toi, it's quite simple.

Caps had an 18.8% pp, good for 8th.
Leafs have a 28.9% pp, good for 2nd.

The Top pp producer in '08 had 47 in 82 games, in '24, Top guy has 43 in 61 so far.

Ovechkin was the top physical force then, and also a far better playmaker. Ovechkin created space, while Matthew's looks for space.
 

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
26,420
11,412
More powerplays with a lower PP% = higher pp toi, it's quite simple.

Caps had an 18.8% pp, good for 8th.
Leafs have a 28.9% pp, good for 2nd.

The Top pp producer in '08 had 47 in 82 games, in '24, Top guy has 43 in 61 so far.

Ovechkin was the top physical force then, and also a far better playmaker. Ovechkin created space, while Matthew's looks for space.

Matthews is every bit the goal scorer Ovechkin was if not better as a two-way center. That’s good enough for me
 

Oscar The Grouch

Registered User
Oct 16, 2021
1,046
2,228
Matthews is every bit the goal scorer Ovechkin was if not better as a two-way center. That’s good enough for me

LOL. Maybe in fantasy land.

Ovechkin actually SCORED the goals Matthews is projected to. Ovechkin also was a physical beast who ran guys into the boards.

Matthew is not good defensively. Always late getting back. He's a skating wrist shot. A great one, but that's it. Very one dimensional. As we've seen with his ghost-mode playoff appearances.
 

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
26,420
11,412
LOL. Maybe in fantasy land.

Ovechkin actually SCORED the goals Matthews is projected to. Ovechkin also was a physical beast who ran guys into the boards.

Matthew is not good defensively. Always late getting back. He's a skating wrist shot. A great one, but that's it. Very one dimensional. As we've seen with his ghost-mode playoff appearances.

 

Phion Keneuf

Bang Bang
Jul 4, 2010
35,616
6,859
More powerplays with a lower PP% = higher pp toi, it's quite simple.

Caps had an 18.8% pp, good for 8th.
Leafs have a 28.9% pp, good for 2nd.

The Top pp producer in '08 had 47 in 82 games, in '24, Top guy has 43 in 61 so far.

Ovechkin was the top physical force then, and also a far better playmaker. Ovechkin created space, while Matthew's looks for space.
How much of that successful Leafs PP can be attributed to Matthews directly? I’d say quite a bit of it.
 

Leafs1991

Registered User
Nov 17, 2015
1,655
1,046
LOL. Maybe in fantasy land.

Ovechkin actually SCORED the goals Matthews is projected to. Ovechkin also was a physical beast who ran guys into the boards.

Matthew is not good defensively. Always late getting back. He's a skating wrist shot. A great one, but that's it. Very one dimensional. As we've seen with his ghost-mode playoff appearances.
You must not watch Leaf games.
 

MacMacandBarbie

Registered User
Dec 9, 2019
2,923
1,930
LOL. Maybe in fantasy land.

Ovechkin actually SCORED the goals Matthews is projected to. Ovechkin also was a physical beast who ran guys into the boards.

Matthew is not good defensively. Always late getting back. He's a skating wrist shot. A great one, but that's it. Very one dimensional. As we've seen with his ghost-mode playoff appearances.
Matthews is good defensively. However he is always taking the late man when the play rushes back on defense. He plays deep in the offensive zone, but he also just doesn’t have the wheels that someone like McDavid contains, so maybe it doesn’t look like he is hustling back as hard.
 

cupface52

Registered User
Jan 12, 2008
4,439
667
Burlington, On
How much of that successful Leafs PP can be attributed to Matthews directly? I’d say quite a bit of it.

Currently, 17 teams have a PP% of 21% or higher. In '08, 2 teams did. PP scoring % changes by era. This years leafs having 10% higher PP than '08 caps, I would attribute it 100% to era.

Though I'd be giving more credit to Nylander, and likely Marner as well for the PP than Matthews.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neil Racki

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad