Atlantic Standings Predictions Thread

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
2,685
2,334
Nobody said it was the new normal. I said i expect him to do 75 to 80 points next year. If i thought his hot streak was his new normal i would have said something like 95 points (1.2 ppg). And again, if you say that statistics didn't show his improvements, then you need to actually watch him play. He was far better in the 2nd half than he was in the first half. Advanced stats are worthless if you don't couple them with actually watching games.
So If Suzuki was far better.

That means either

A) Caufield got significantly worse
B) Slafkofsky got significantly worse/was a downgrade over the previous linemate
C) Montreals defensive core got significantly worse throughout the course of the year

Or some combination

Because MTLs on ice results with suzuki (again, outside of the change in shooting) were worse after the new year.
 

NikolaTesla

Registered User
Aug 2, 2009
320
271
Because he started shooting 22.5%
Which means his linemates, whom as i said got better, made him better pass or opened the ice for him. Are you following the conversation?

So If Suzuki was far better.

That means either

A) Caufield got significantly worse
B) Slafkofsky got significantly worse/was a downgrade over the previous linemate
C) Montreals defensive core got significantly worse throughout the course of the year

Or some combination

Because MTLs on ice results with suzuki (again, outside of the change in shooting) were worse after the new year.
Nice f***ing logic there. Those 3 players literally almost doubled their productions in the 2nd half of the season, but they all got worse. Rofl that guy.
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
2,685
2,334
Which means his linemates, who, as i said got better, made him better pass or opened the ice for him. Are you following the conversation?
Except those higher quality chances would show in his other metrics. (here comes the "Analytics are fake when they say something I don't like")
 

NikolaTesla

Registered User
Aug 2, 2009
320
271
Except those higher quality chances would show in his other metrics. (here comes the "Analytics are fake when they say something I don't like")
Its ok bro you feel free to believe that Suzuki got worse lol. Whatever makes you sleep at night. How many habs games did you watch last year, other than the ones against the devils?
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
2,685
2,334
Its ok bro you feel free to believe that Suzuki got worse lol. Whatever makes you sleep at night. How many habs games did you watch last year, other than the ones against the devils.
Not what I said at all.

I disagreed with the claim that he got "significantly better", when the only thing that improved was his shooting %.
 

leafsfan5

Registered User
Jun 14, 2014
14,740
25,533
It feels like every year this type of thread turns into Sens/Habs/Wings fans arguing and it always ends up being a battle of mid
 

Necrobutcher

Registered User
Sep 20, 2018
1,594
3,459
Tampere, Finland
Toronto
Florida
Boston
Buffalo (WC)
Tampa (WC)
Ottawa
Detroit
Montreal

It's gonna be a bloobath. I think even Montreal is in the mix for a playoff spot. A very solid division overall.
 

Zalos

Berktwad
Feb 2, 2009
1,994
1,487
Quebec
Anyways, no one in Toronto wants Marner to stay that badly. We don't care he is an elite player, we have Matthews and Willy and his deal needs to make sense. To be honest him and Nylander are pretty comparable players these days. Marner is better defensively but Nylander is better offensively.

That's why he does not deserve 3M more than Nylander. Makes no sense.
Marner is better than Nylander offensively too. He will hit 100 points this season if he doesn't get injured.

By the way, I think the Atlantic is the hardest division to predict. I could see scenarios where there ends up being multiple upsets. If the younger teams (Detroit, Buffalo, Ottawa) finally remain stellar throughout the year and some of the 'top' teams have an off year, you never know.
 

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
18,159
27,896
Marner is better than Nylander offensively too. He will hit 100 points this season if he doesn't get injured.

By the way, I think the Atlantic is the hardest division to predict. I could see scenarios where there ends up being multiple upsets. If the younger teams (Detroit, Buffalo, Ottawa) finally remain stellar throughout the year and some of the 'top' teams have an off year, you never know.

I don't think that's been the case for a few years now. Nylander is a more direct offensive player than Marner.
 

Essenege

Registered User
Oct 5, 2019
1,046
1,066
That would

a) assume that Suzuki will assist on every single one of Caufield's goals
b) assume that Caufield's shooting % will increase by more than Suzuki's

The impacts should cancel out in terms of MTL, or even a slight bump by a goal or two based on luck regression.

This regression will not help Suzuki's point totals.
They both have around 4-5% expected regression to mean, but Caufield shoots way more (quite an important piece you forgot in your math)

If they both regress to mean it’s a net positive impact for the Habs and neutral for Suzuki (if he assists around 2/3rds of Caufield goals which I would guess is pretty much it)

If you want to argue only the negative will happen, go for it, I prefer to keep it both ways.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad