thebestnic
Registered User
- Jun 29, 2022
- 365
- 604
Sens finished two points ahead of the Habs.It's amazing how quickly expectations have risen for the Habs this year.
Sens finished two points ahead of the Habs.It's amazing how quickly expectations have risen for the Habs this year.
Sens finished two points ahead of the Habs.
From Habs fans' perspective, expectations have been building slowly over the last two/three years. The entire core was rebooted; since then the team's been improving incrementally. This is the first year many of us see them entering the next tier in the standing – not playoffs, but getting close. The young roster is developing, they've got high-upside rookies coming in. The conversation has shifted from last season to this one which, from the outside, looks sudden. But from the inside.... feels like we've been waiting a lonnnng time.It's amazing how quickly expectations have risen for the Habs this year.
That they have finished 2 points behind the Sens. Apparently the Sens are the only team allowed to make improvements in the offseason. I have the Sens as a 88 points ish team this season and I would put the Habs at 82 for the record. I just think saying they are in a completely different universe like the poster was doing is stupidWith the worst goaltending in the league.
What does that say about the Habs?
The idea that MTL is right in the thick with Detroit, Buffalo, and Ottawa in terms of hopes going into next season is kinda crazy.It's amazing how quickly expectations have risen for the Habs this year.
Couple points here.Detroits other big edge this past year besides excellent shooting was penalty differential. Usually penalty differential is around net 0 for a team, because of how refs game manage.
Detroit had a below average PK, below average PP, and were not good Even Strength. Usually not a great recipe for success
Ottawa is likely the team most poised to make a 22-23 NJD type jump (where NJD went from -60 goaltending to +10 causing a massive swing).
Now, they hired an absolute buffoon as a coach so I expect their analytics to be much worse next year to counteract better goaltending (like how Green had a worse record with terrible analytics than Ruff despite getting some rock solid goaltending after taking over)
It's amazing how quickly expectations have risen for the Habs this year.
They arent any better than Ottawa or Buffalo on paper thats for sure. So if the other two are then they are.Detroit isn't a "bad" club.
The Habs were in 41 1 goal games 14-27 and another 15 2 goal games .They were in 2/3 of the games they played.Would not take a lot to turn losses into wins.The first line scored 53 goals in the second half which would have put them top 6 and that having no second line. They have one this year.Hopefully MSL starts teaching defensive systems this year which will improve the goals against. Hutson is the wild card this year and we will see on him.The idea that MTL is right in the thick with Detroit, Buffalo, and Ottawa in terms of hopes going into next season is kinda crazy.
There's a reason the vegas point lines (looking at FanDuel) for each team are:
88.5 for buffalo
90.5 for Detroit
91.5 for Ottawa
75.5 for Montreal
for some context, MTL's point line is as close to detroits, as detroits is to Edmonton's
Only CBJ (68.5), MTL (75.5), Chicago (74.5), SJS 64.5), Calgary (81.5) and Anaheim (72.5) are below 85 points.
MTL was a bottom 5 team last year despite getting absolutely incredible goaltending results.
They did not add a single UFA.
Lot of expectations on Patrick Laine to stay healthy and do some real heavy lifting.
They were not as far along the rebuild curve?The goaltending was fineWith the worst goaltending in the league.
What does that say about the Habs?
Ottawa and Buffalo should be the top 2 of those 4 they have significantly more talented teams at the more important positions. Ottawa may not make the playoffs but they had a good offseason in insulating its young players with veterans and players that are hard to play against. Ottawa had league worst goaltending last season, if the even get average goaltending its going to increase the point total by atleast 10. They will also have Pinto for a full season and wont have the instability they had last year with all the chaos of the new owner, the suspension, losing the pick turnover in management and coaching. There is some stability, I dont know if they make the playoffs but it cant go any worse than it did last year.That’s last year. We are predicting this coming season. And I see Detroit as in the bottom four in their division. I see the bottom four finishing:
Ottawa
Buffalo
Detroit
Montreal.
Detroits PP ranked 18th in goal differential/60 (+6.6/60)Couple points here.
1. Ottawa and Tampa's PP opp differentials were also solidly above 0. Ottawa's even higher than Detroit's at a +38
2. Detroit's PK was ranked 14th, definitely what I'd call average.
3. Detroit's PP was ranked 9th, slightly above average?
4. Agreed they weren't good at ES
5. The roster isn't the same as it was last season. Particularly with a few key players being young and still ramping up to their primes. Regression to a mean might make sense during the course of a season with minimal roster turnover, but... moving out 4-5 guys bringing in 4-5 guys... stuff changes.
Bingo. Also add the fact the team is going to have real expectations this year whether its warranted or not. All you have to see if the online presence of Montreal fans and the media. Its not easy for young teams to switch from no pressure to pressure ask sens and sabers fans.The idea that MTL is right in the thick with Detroit, Buffalo, and Ottawa in terms of hopes going into next season is kinda crazy.
There's a reason the vegas point lines (looking at FanDuel) for each team are:
88.5 for buffalo
90.5 for Detroit
91.5 for Ottawa
75.5 for Montreal
for some context, MTL's point line is as close to detroits, as detroits is to Edmonton's
Only CBJ (68.5), MTL (75.5), Chicago (74.5), SJS 64.5), Calgary (81.5) and Anaheim (72.5) are below 85 points.
MTL was a bottom 5 team last year despite getting absolutely incredible goaltending results.
They did not add a single UFA.
Lot of expectations on Patrick Laine to stay healthy and do some real heavy lifting.
MTL had a bottom 5 goal differentialThe Habs were in 41 1 goal games 14-27 and another 15 2 goal games .They were in 2/3 of the games they played.Would not take a lot to turn losses into wins.The first line scored 53 goals in the second half which would have put them top 6 and that having no second line. They have one this year.Hopefully MSL starts teaching defensive systems this year which will improve the goals against. Hutson is the wild card this year and we will see on him.
They were not as far along the rebuild curve?The goaltending was fine
Why would any one?Detroits PP ranked 18th in goal differential/60 (+6.6/60)
Detroits PK ranked 19th in goal differential/60 (-6.71/60)
Detroits EV ranked 23rd in goal differential/60 (-0.16/60)
If you look at xGoals metrics they were better on the PP, and absolutely atrocious on the PK (only MTL was worse).
I don't see much steep improvement available internally. Sure Seider and Raymond are young and developing (but they are getting to the generally slower part of the development curve), but on the other side you a number of guys in their 30s, the most important one being Kane at age 36.
Well, if you were trying to look forward to a future season, like we are in this scenario, expected goals metrics are much better indicators of future success.Why would any one?
Gave averages there which does give the entire story. 2/3 of the games they were in and had a rep of being a tough team to play against. The demographics of the team leans toward Improvement. I suspect I am going to be reading a lot of "The Habs are over rated" comments on here this yearMTL had a bottom 5 goal differential
MTL had a bottom 5 expected goal differential
MTL had a bottom 5 record.
This idea that MTL was better than their record suggested last year is just wrong.
But they apparently weren't a very good indicator last season since the Wings outperformed their xG...Well, if you were trying to look forward to a future season, like we are in this scenario, expected goals metrics are much better indicators of future success.
Funny thing is that quip may not be all that far off the mark this year8-way tie
You are failing to understand the difference between predictive and descriptive stats.But they apparently weren't a very good indicator last season since the Wings outperformed their xG...
Feels like a metric made to make you feel better for underperforming. We did poorly, but we were expected to do better. If you did better than expected, why care what you were expected to do?
You don't understand statistics all that well do you?You
Gave averages there which does give the entire story. 2/3 of the games they were in and had a rep of being a tough team to play against. The demographics of the team leans toward Improvement. I suspect I am going to be reading a lot of "The Habs are over rated" comments on here this year