Fatass
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 24,241
- 15,980
Imo Yzerman has made choices that puts them into the “bad” group with Ottawa, Buffalo and Montreal. These four will be bottom of their division.Detroit isn't a "bad" club.
Imo Yzerman has made choices that puts them into the “bad” group with Ottawa, Buffalo and Montreal. These four will be bottom of their division.Detroit isn't a "bad" club.
Lindholm brings significantly more to Boston than DeBrusk and I like DeBrusk.I don't think they are missing the playoffs, I don't think the top 4 in the Atlantic is changing for at least 3 more years.
However I'd be lying to you if I said they were as scary as they weren't even last season.
The safety net that was Ullmark is gone, they got Lindholm but lost Debrusk, I feel like that's a wash up front.
However I do think they got much better on defense.
As long as Swayman is healthy they should be fine.
If Swayman goes down then they might be f***ed.
Tampa could fall in two seasons because their core players suffered so much abuse in their cup runs. Over 300 games in 3 years will destroy a body. They also always make the playoffs so they don't have long offseasons to nurse their nagging injuriesRealistically which of Montreal, Detroit, Buffalo or Ottawa is good enough to knock them out?
I don't think Montral or Buffalo finish above Ottawa. Those two teams have huge question marks. With the moves over the summer (especially Ullmark), I don't think the Sens have as many holes in the lineup.Let’s say:
- Toronto
- Boston
- Florida
- Tampa (WC1)
- Detroit (WC2)
- Montreal (just on the outside of the playoff picture but in it till the last few games)
- Buffalo
- Ottawa
Very difficult to handicap it. I got Buffalo and Ottawa in the basement, but they could also easily be in the playoff race ahead of MTL and Detroit. It’s not easy to predict
Toronto could also easily take a step back and finish 4th or even 5th. The goaltending is very sus and the D is on the older side.
They needed Zadarov on the backend in my opinion. Lindholm and Carlo are big but they are gentle giants , not really physical at all. MacAvoy is the only physical defenceman they have and we saw last year that it took its toll on him . I agree they are thin up front and definitely need another top 6 forward. Assuming they sign Swayman and with the D group they have they should make the playoffs but it’s not looking like they have enough firepower up front for a deep playoff run .Doesn’t feel to me like they really needed Zadorov at all. I think they would have been better off using that money to improve the forward group. Lindholm is a good pick up as like a high end 2C/low end 1C and was a positional need but losing Debrusk cancels out some of that. I think stylistically they will miss Debrusk. Ullmark to Korpisalo is also a significant downgrade.
Not sure yet if I agree on the powerplay, but you’re definitely right about McDonagh being likely able to help defensively instead of Sergachev who was definitely overpaid in my eyes as well.
Lindholm brings significantly more to Boston than DeBrusk and I like DeBrusk.
I generally liked the off-season Boston had. Maybe in years 5-6-7 for Lindholm and Zadorov contract won't be nice, but you're hoping to win within 5 years. Boston D-core is big and mobile, that's the type of D-core needed in the playoffs.They needed Zadarov on the backend in my opinion. Lindholm and Carlo are big but they are gentle giants , not really physical at all. MacAvoy is the only physical defenceman they have and we saw last year that it took its toll on him . I agree they are thin up front and definitely need another top 6 forward. Assuming they sign Swayman and with the D group they have they should make the playoffs but it’s not looking like they have enough firepower up front for a deep playoff run .
I generally liked the off-season Boston had. Maybe in years 5-6-7 for Lindholm and Zadorov contract won't be nice, but you're hoping to win within 5 years. Boston D-core is big and mobile, that's the type of D-core needed in the playoffs.
Boston forward group is good enough to be top 3 in the division, and it's a lot easier to add a impactful forward then it is to add a impactful d-man later in the season.
I don't think Montral or Buffalo finish above Ottawa. Those two teams have huge question marks. With the moves over the summer (especially Ullmark), I don't think the Sens have as many holes in the lineup.
WC1/2 is going to be between Tampa/Ottawa/Detroit/Washington imo. I think Tampa ultimately takes one of them but WC2 is a big tossup.
idk but compared to the other "bottom" teams I sure like our defensive core a lot more than anyone else....everybody knows our weakness is lacking a top 6 forward without someone breaking out other than that there isn't really any big question marks. I don't really see anyone challenging Dahlin, Power, Samuelsson, and Byram is probably the strongest top 4 that the Sabres have had in a very long time and our bottom pair is alright.What are these huge question marks that keep us from competing with Ottawa and Detroit?
I recently read Boston is the tallest/heaviest team in the league. Plus they're the 6th youngest team in the league. Crazy to think the last 10 years many had them as over the hill with weakest prospect pool. Yet they remain competitive and cup challengers. I love the new additions. Going to be a fun season in the East. I'm expecting to see one of habitants senators wings or Sabres make a push this year. A change of scenery is needed at the top. One of Boston TO panthers or bolts could be on the outside. Anything is possible.Yeah when we get into years 5-7 for Lindholm and Zadorov you are also past Pasta's prime and unless the Bruins get stupid lucky again like with Pasta and McAvoy, the Bruins would likely be heading towards rebuilding finally. Of course, five years is a long time, so maybe they get lucky again. I wouldn't bet on it, but my kid will also be coming into prime sports age then so I am hopeful, lol.
Detroit was closer to Toronto than Ottawa was to Detroit last season.Imo Yzerman has made choices that puts them into the “bad” group with Ottawa, Buffalo and Montreal. These four will be bottom of their division.
That’s last year. We are predicting this coming season. And I see Detroit as in the bottom four in their division. I see the bottom four finishing:Detroit was closer to Toronto than Ottawa was to Detroit last season.
Detroit finished 25th in xGoals differential, Ottawa finished 13th.Detroit was closer to Toronto than Ottawa was to Detroit last season.
Not sure why Ottawa and Buffalo are so much higher than the Habs let alone the Red WingsPanthers
Bruins
Leafs
Lightening
Sabres
Senators
Red Wings
Habs
Toronto could also easily take a step back and finish 4th or even 5th. The goaltending is very sus and the D is on the older side.
No I'm judging based on the moves I saw the bottom 4 teams make.
I don't like most of what Detroit did, except replaceing Perron with Tarasenko but the rest of their moves sucked.
I don't like anything Buffalo did, I don't think Ryan Mclode or Beck Malinstine is going to make a Damn bit of difference.
I don't think replaceing Skinner with Zucker is an upgrade.
If you wanted to you could look at Zucker as the replacement for Olofsson and maybe that's an upgrade but then that means you didn't replace Skinner which still leads to a downgrade.
I like what Ottawa did bringing in Ullmark, Perron and Jensen, although I think Jensen should should have been brought in as an addition rather than a direct replacement for Chychrun but I still like Jensen.
I don't think Ottawa gets in because I still think It's a 4/4 split but if It's 5/3 I could see Ottawa taking that 5th spot.
With Montreal I think the Laine risk is well worth taking but even if he scored 50 this year they aren't making the playoffs.
The reason I don't see the bottom 4 teams and top 4 teams changing is because I don't think the bottom 4 tried hard enough to close the gap.
So if Detroit was able to finish with 91 points with that xGoal differential, it would stand to reason that even minimal improvements would make them a strong playoff contender, no?Detroit finished 25th in xGoals differential, Ottawa finished 13th.
Not really.So if Detroit was able to finish with 91 points with that xGoal differential, it would stand to reason that even minimal improvements would make them a strong playoff contender, no?
Could be. I wouldn't necessarily assume xGD to stay static from year to year though with the only variable being sh%. I wish it was that simple, but it rarely is.Not really.
Historically it suggests a decline is coming the following year as shooting luck regresses to the mean
Detroits other big edge this past year besides excellent shooting was penalty differential. Usually penalty differential is around net 0 for a team, because of how refs game manage.Could be. I wouldn't necessarily assume xGD to stay static from year to year though with the only variable being sh%. I wish it was that simple, but it rarely is.
Not sure why Ottawa and Buffalo are so much higher than the Habs let alone the Red Wings