DaveMatthew
Bring in Peter
This is like your company's HR department telling you to go to them first, instead of talking to other people or a lawyer.
Never follow that advice.
I’m just throwing **** out there cause we don’t have the whole story. I’m not saying it’s right to use that kind of language. I’m saying let’s hear the whole story before anyone jumps to any conclusions.
Did he call him a slur or was he referring to the offensive lyrics in the songs? I might have missed something so apologies if I did. Either way we’ve heard one side so far. If it comes out that he called him a slur then that’s one thing. If he was demanding the music be changed and referred to the problem he had with it by using the same language that was used in the song that’s a bit different no?What could the "whole story" be?
Aliu said Peters called him a slur. Two teammates who were in the room independently confirmed that this happened. That is all that needs to be known.
It doesn't matter what the content of the music or lyrics were. You had a 43 year-old in a position of significant authority calling a 20 year-old employee a slur, in the workplace.
What more do you need to know?
He didn't call him the slur, and that's not what Aliu said. He still deserves to be fired now, just saying he didn't personally call him that word. He was referring to the music.What could the "whole story" be?
Aliu said Peters called him a slur. Two teammates who were in the room independently confirmed that this happened. That is all that needs to be known.
It doesn't matter what the content of the music or lyrics were. You had a 43 year-old in a position of significant authority calling a 20 year-old employee a slur, in the workplace.
What more do you need to know?
Did he call him a slur or was he referring to the offensive lyrics in the songs? I might have missed something so apologies if I did. Either way we’ve heard one side so far. If it comes out that he called him a slur then that’s one thing. If he was demanding the music be changed and referred to the problem he had with it by using the same language that was used in the song that’s a bit different no?
Again, I might have missed something. ?
Did he call him a slur or was he referring to the offensive lyrics in the songs? I might have missed something so apologies if I did. Either way we’ve heard one side so far. If it comes out that he called him a slur then that’s one thing. If he was demanding the music be changed and referred to the problem he had with it by using the same language that was used in the song that’s a bit different no?
Again, I might have missed something. ?
I’m just throwing **** out there cause we don’t have the whole story. I’m not saying it’s right to use that kind of language. I’m saying let’s hear the whole story before anyone jumps to any conclusions. So I’m throwing out speculations because that’s all we have. Meaning let’s hold on and get all the details here.
If the issue is the language and the language was used in the songs AA was playing and people did not want to hear it but AA continues to play it then that’s also a problem.
Either way it’s unacceptable. Even if not you’re intent, it’s coming off as condoning the language in certain circumstances.Did he call him a slur or was he referring to the offensive lyrics in the songs? I might have missed something so apologies if I did. Either way we’ve heard one side so far. If it comes out that he called him a slur then that’s one thing. If he was demanding the music be changed and referred to the problem he had with it by using the same language that was used in the song that’s a bit different no?
Again, I might have missed something. ?
This is like your company's HR department telling you to go to them first, instead of talking to other people or a lawyer.
Never follow that advice.
Eh, not really. History is full of people championing good causes for residual benefits rather than the actual reward of doing good and helping people.
I was just putting together a random scenario because we don’t have many details. I used “white kids” cause I assumed a lot of people here are white and might be offended by that. It’s a race issue so white and black etc.I’ll ask again why you specifically referenced white kids.
How could AA playing the music justify what Peters said?
What actual details could justify him using the words? You keep Sauk g let’s get all the details, so in your mind there must be a context that absolves Peters.
AA playing the music is not a “problem” that needs to be considered.
You are really stretching. It’s weird how far some people go to excuse/justify behaviour which is racist.
No offense but this has nothing to do with the actual issue at hand: the fact that Peters clearly makes people he works with very uncomfortable.
How other people react to this kind of revelation has no bearing on the matter. It is classic whataboutism.
[Mod]
Absolutely, but all evidence seems to be pointing in one direction. Not sure he should even speak unless he comes out an apologizes for his actions. If he comes out and tries to defend himself, he will be in more trouble than he already is.It’s not looking good for BP so far but again, he gets a chance to respond no?
I was just putting together a random scenario because we don’t have many details. I used “white kids” cause I assumed a lot of people here are white and might be offended by that. It’s a race issue so white and black etc.
I’m seriously against all of that language.
Not trying to defend the behaviour by BP but I can see a scenario in which he was so highly offended and upset by the lyrics in the songs that he ended up saying something he regrets. Still doesn’t make it right.
I just don’t want to see conclusions being made until both sides have had a chance to speak.
It’s not looking good for BP so far but again, he gets a chance to respond no?
sounds good, next do we wanna talk about sample size?
This is like your company's HR department telling you to go to them first, instead of talking to other people or a lawyer.
Never follow that advice.
Don't really see the problem if the PA is able to handle the situation. The player will always have the option to go to social media if they remain unsatisfied after that.This is like your company's HR department telling you to go to them first, instead of talking to other people or a lawyer.
Never follow that advice.
Yeah I’m going to have to hear/read the lyrics to the songs that were played by AA before making any judgement on this one.
If AA was in charge of the music and was subjecting the players and staff to offensive language containing the n word and was maybe even asked previously to switch it up but didn’t then doesn’t that change things a bit?
I’m not saying that’s what happened but I need more details.
well yes but right now the universe is dealing with these guysOr just pieces of ****?
I think it's completely different to be honest. I'd go to HR with absolutely nothing of consequence before talking to my union rep. Any decent union should be acting in the best interests of its members.