Maybe I need to word it better... it's because I was talking about both depth and prospect pool at the same time, meant to say their depth is crap and their prospect pool is mediocre (average). If you think the Sens prospects are generally hyped, wait to see for Habs prospects. Tinordi, Fuchale and Beaulieu (their 3 best prospects on HF) are overrated IMO... and so many were before (been following that team for a long time being in Montreal). Hudon and Andrighetto have good potential, Scherbak and McCarron have good productive starts, De La Rose will probably be a good 3rd liner but their pool is considered vastly better than the Sens and I couldn't disagree more with that... I mean, Sens have Paul at 16th, Lindberg at 17th, McCormick at 20th, Robinson at 22th, Wideman at 23th, Perron at 25th, etc. Did you know they had 5 forwards prospects with the same grade as Lazar on HF? Personally, I don't think they have a prospect nearly as good as Lazar, Ceci or Stone. Thing is when you compare the individual stats and progressions over the years and how is Hamilton has been doing for a while, I know which pool I would take
By the way, some are already pencilling Scherbak on their first line RW for next year and comparing him with Galchenyuk... Sens fans are wayyyyy more conservative, which may appear a bit weird to read
Would you take Lazar, Ceci and Stone or Tinordi, De La Rose and Beaulieu? Would you take Puempel, Pageau and Claesson or Scherbak, Andrighetto and Fucale? Prince, Englund, Wikstrand and Dzingel or McCarron, Lehkonen, Nygren and Sekac? In reality both pools are decent/good and probably close but I'd take the Sens one. Don't see why Habs would be 10th and Sens 19th
If I find some time to soon, I will make a table comparing both pools and players production, should be fun