Around the NHL: PTO Season Becomes Waiver Season

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dingo44

We already won the trade
Sponsor
Jul 21, 2015
11,674
14,184
Greensboro, NC
SmartSelect_20230819_120032_Instagram.jpg
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,922
40,028
Rochester, NY

Dingo44

We already won the trade
Sponsor
Jul 21, 2015
11,674
14,184
Greensboro, NC
Hagel extends in Tampa, 8 years, $6.5m per. Crazy that he was in our org, but crazier that he makes $0.6 less than Tage and Cozens.

That is next level bonkers. Tampa is going to fall off a cliff hard within three seasons at most.

Man if Josh Bloom turns into something we'll never hear the end of it. But Botts was 1000% wrong on not offering Hagel a contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JLewyB

kirby11

Registered User
Mar 16, 2011
10,158
5,086
Buffalo, NY
That feels like an overpay, but he's also only 24.

Still can't Botts refused to sign him when the forward pipeline was a clearly busting Alex Nylander and a bunch of other misfit toys
 

OkimLom

Registered User
May 3, 2010
15,594
7,030

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,922
40,028
Rochester, NY
Let's be honest, Hagel was just another prospect. Until he went to Chicago, and was actually slowly developed. Now he's in an organization that is well known for getting the most out of their players.
He had back-to-back PPG seasons and second on the team in scoring for the Red Deer Rebels after being drafted. He was a little more than just another prospect and many wanted to see him signed and were disappointed when Botterill opted to let him walk.

Capture.PNG
 

HogtownSabresfan

Registered User
Jan 13, 2010
7,167
2,017
Let's be honest, Hagel was just another prospect. Until he went to Chicago, and was actually slowly developed. Now he's in an organization that is well known for getting the most out of their players.

NHL GMs and staff get paid major dollars today for big decisions. Sorry, you blow a major call on your watch, you own it. You find a guy in the sixth round and he scores 30, you get to own that too. It's way too easy to say people got lucky. Anyone can pick a top 10 guy in the first round.
 

Zman5778

Moderator
Oct 4, 2005
26,999
25,949
Cressona/Reading, PA
He had back-to-back PPG seasons and second on the team in scoring for the Red Deer Rebels after being drafted. He was a little more than just another prospect and many wanted to see him signed and were disappointed when Botterill opted to let him walk.

Yeah. There were quite a few of us that scratched our heads that he wasn't offered a contract.

Not saying he would have become a $50M guy here, but surely he could have turned into SOMETHING.
 

SnuggaRUDE

Registered User
Apr 5, 2013
9,561
7,111
I think at the time I was the biggest pro-Hagel voice on here. There wasn't a lot of chatter about him.

Failing memory wants to say he wasn't offered a contract in part because they were close to the limit at the time. In particular the Cornel/Karabeck ELCs which ate the spots in Rochester.

They should have found away to dump those guys.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
156,602
111,213
Tarnation
Good for Hagel turning adversity into motivation. I recall a lot of chatter that since Hagel wasn't "one of his guys" that Botterill was justified in not signing him. I was torn, he wasn't very good in his WHL games I watched so I could see them thinking that is the player and moving on. Heck, in all of that he had an non-contract camp invite to the Habs training camp and they didn't sign him either.
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,922
40,028
Rochester, NY
Shame on the 30 GM's who passed on Brayden Point (multiple times). How could they pass on a NHL 50 goal scorer?

Hindsight is easy.......

Hagel was an uninspiring prospect at the time his rights expired.
No he wasn't. He turned out better than expected. But, if you are giving Pekar and Pu ELCs, then they should have given Hagel one. But, he wasn't Botts's guy, so...
 

Rowley Birkin

Registered User
Oct 31, 2004
10,915
4,084
No he wasn't. He turned out better than expected. But, if you are giving Pekar and Pu ELCs, then they should have given Hagel one. But, he wasn't Botts's guy, so...
As has been posted previously - they were close to the 50 contract limit at the time. You can't blame a GM for not signing what appeared to be a fringe prospect, that he didn't draft.

There's also the discussion to be had that Hagel could well not have developed as he did, had he remained in our system instead of being let go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jacob582

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,922
40,028
Rochester, NY
As has been posted previously - they were close to the 50 contract limit at the time. You can't blame a GM for not signing what appeared to be a fringe prospect, that he didn't draft.

There's also the discussion to be had that Hagel could well not have developed as he did, had he remained in our system instead of being let go.
The 50 contract limit thing is a red herring given the timing of when you need to sign a CHL draftee prior to them re-entering the draft. As long as they had one slot, they could easily have signed him. Or Budik. But, they passed on both. One looks bad in hindsight and one is fine.

And personally, I'm glad that Adams hasn't fallen into the "not my guy" thinking for a large part.
 

Jacob582

Registered User
Oct 16, 2012
10,217
3,830
No he wasn't. He turned out better than expected. But, if you are giving Pekar and Pu ELCs, then they should have given Hagel one. But, he wasn't Botts's guy, so...
Hagel was a fringe prospect at the time. Montreal had him in camp too and didn't sign him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jcbeze
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad