Maybe, but that doesn't invalidate my point or make it an unfair assessment.That's not fair to say. People have been hating and shitting on Florida for decades, it's nothing new.
Maybe, but that doesn't invalidate my point or make it an unfair assessment.That's not fair to say. People have been hating and shitting on Florida for decades, it's nothing new.
sorry to hear about the regression of civil rights and personal freedom.
I don't know. Either this site allows politics or it doesn't. Because I'm pretty sure if I countered this claim it would be removed.
I don't care which way we go but lets keep it consistent.
$1b ain't what it used to be...looks like the Sens have been sold for 1BN!
especially in Canadian (ducks)$1b ain't what it used to be...
Robi's description makes my day.
I doubt NHL teams really lose money the way that is claimed. If they were money losers, after all, would they really all be worth a billion dollars?AND they need a new Arena to be viable.
If I'm a NHL owner who bought for 200M or less, I'm at least listening at this point. I mean, most NHL teams lose money. If people are willing to ante up 1B for Ottawa, I have to think nearly every team has record valuations now.
The next CBA will definitely have a fight over player medical freedom.
BUT can we stop with the bullshit narrative that the timeline of events was (1) Jack got hurt and asked for the ADR surgery, (2)the Sabres refused and (3) then Jack asked to be traded.
When in reality Jacked asked for a trade a year prior to the injury/surgery request. That he still wanted to be traded even if the Sabres approved the surgery. So the Sabres understandably didn’t want to take on any of the risk involved for a player who didn’t want to be here.
I know the “evil team refuses player surgery request” angle is the sexier story. But thats not the reality of the situation. This article also really puts into focus what a shitty situation Jack put the Sabres in. There were very few teams open to the surgery or owners willing to take on the risk.
Almost half the league has 1st time coachesLaviolette hired as Rangers coach is the NHL, rinse, repeat/good old boys club ad infinitum.
The next CBA will definitely have a fight over player medical freedom.
BUT can we stop with the bullshit narrative that the timeline of events was (1) Jack got hurt and asked for the ADR surgery, (2)the Sabres refused and (3) then Jack asked to be traded.
When in reality Jacked asked for a trade a year prior to the injury/surgery request. That he still wanted to be traded even if the Sabres approved the surgery. So the Sabres understandably didn’t want to take on any of the risk involved for a player who didn’t want to be here.
I know the “evil team refuses player surgery request” angle is the sexier story. But thats not the reality of the situation. This article also really puts into focus what a shitty situation Jack put the Sabres in. There were very few teams open to the surgery or owners willing to take on the risk.
Really? I'm stuck in a time warp then. Apologies for the shit post, and let me go do my homework!Almost half the league has 1st time coaches
It sure if you (or anybody else on here) knows - but can you take out a sort of equity loan on a franchise like that? Or would that just be bringing on a minority owner?AND they need a new Arena to be viable.
If I'm a NHL owner who bought for 200M or less, I'm at least listening at this point. I mean, most NHL teams lose money. If people are willing to ante up 1B for Ottawa, I have to think nearly every team has record valuations now.
BUT can we stop with the bullshit narrative that the timeline of events was (1) Jack got hurt and asked for the ADR surgery, (2)the Sabres refused and (3) then Jack asked to be traded.
Eichel didn't ask for a trade though. In his own words, he simply said if they wanted to go through another rebuild, he didn't want to be there.
They didn't go through a rebuild. They signed Taylor Hall.
The next season they finished dead last again, Eichel got injured and all that drama happened.
So yes, that isn't some narrative. It's how it happened. Eichel wasn't done with Buffalo until they refused to allow him to get the surgery he wanted. If you keep watching that same interview, Eichel even offered to return to the team and play if they did allow him to get the surgery he wanted, and the team declined.
Reinhart publicly said he didn't want to go through another rebuild. It was never considered a 'asking to be traded'. Same with Risto.
Eichel didn't ask for a trade though. In his own words, he simply said if they wanted to go through another rebuild, he didn't want to be there.
They didn't go through a rebuild. They signed Taylor Hall.
The next season they finished dead last again, Eichel got injured and all that drama happened.
So yes, that isn't some narrative. It's how it happened. Eichel wasn't done with Buffalo until they refused to allow him to get the surgery he wanted. If you keep watching that same interview, Eichel even offered to return to the team and play if they did allow him to get the surgery he wanted, and the team declined.
Reinhart publicly said he didn't want to go through another rebuild. It was never considered a 'asking to be traded'. Same with Risto.
He was willing to come back so he could be showcased for a trade (which as you can imagine went over real well with the organization).So yes, that isn't some narrative. It's how it happened. Eichel wasn't done with Buffalo until they refused to allow him to get the surgery he wanted. If you keep watching that same interview, Eichel even offered to return to the team and play if they did allow him to get the surgery he wanted, and the team declined.
Yeah, Jack’s explanation on how the problems with his neck started was quite vague.Good stuff.
As an aside, I wonder if he showed up with the broken ribs to training camp after the lockdown due to falling off a belaying line while rock climbing. Because coming into another season unable to perform due to an off-ice "training injury" certainly wasn't an endearing moment.
Eichel didn't ask for a trade though. In his own words, he simply said if they wanted to go through another rebuild, he didn't want to be there.
Eichel didn't ask for a trade though. In his own words, he simply said if they wanted to go through another rebuild, he didn't want to be there.
They didn't go through a rebuild. They signed Taylor Hall.
The next season they finished dead last again, Eichel got injured and all that drama happened.
So yes, that isn't some narrative. It's how it happened. Eichel wasn't done with Buffalo until they refused to allow him to get the surgery he wanted. If you keep watching that same interview, Eichel even offered to return to the team and play if they did allow him to get the surgery he wanted, and the team declined.
Reinhart publicly said he didn't want to go through another rebuild. It was never considered a 'asking to be traded'. Same with Risto.
Eichel didn't ask for a trade though. In his own words, he simply said if they wanted to go through another rebuild, he didn't want to be there.
They didn't go through a rebuild. They signed Taylor Hall.
The next season they finished dead last again, Eichel got injured and all that drama happened.
So yes, that isn't some narrative. It's how it happened. Eichel wasn't done with Buffalo until they refused to allow him to get the surgery he wanted. If you keep watching that same interview, Eichel even offered to return to the team and play if they did allow him to get the surgery he wanted, and the team declined.
Reinhart publicly said he didn't want to go through another rebuild. It was never considered a 'asking to be traded'. Same with Risto.
Oh btw. We all knew Sam and Risto asked for trades due to the rebuild. No one was daft enough to think knowing the reason they asked to be traded changes the fact they asked.