The team signing the player should have to give up a pick much like the way offersheeting works. Except the pick should be based on NHL games played in the next season.
At least give the team that lost out some kind of compensation.
I don't feel sorry for the teams when they lose out. They have up to 4 years to sign the player. If they don't, they don't. No one complains how unfair it is when a player isn't offered a contract by a team.
I like the idea of treating the player like an RFA. If your drafting team is low-balling you, go out and sign an offer sheet with another team.
In a Kevin Hayes situation, Hayes would be free to sign a contract with the Rangers but the Hawks could match. And if Hayes is hell-bent on not playing in Chicago, he can demand a trade and the Hawks could trade him for his true worth.
Jesus.... and while I'm watching the early game OT, Anaheim wasted no time to go up two on the Flames....
Calgary's fun. I hope they either hang onto a playoff spot or pull of a huge win in the lottery.
I don't feel sorry for the teams when they lose out. They have up to 4 years to sign the player. If they don't, they don't. No one complains how unfair it is when a player isn't offered a contract by a team.
Hawks wanted to sign Hayes. They made him an offer. They got #54 Overall for him. They invested a pick in him that was about 30 spots higher. This compensation is not fair. Rangers get him for nothing. It should be the Rangers 2nd what we got.
Hayes got what he wanted.
Rangers too without giving up anything.
Hawks got less than fair value for him. Same with Ducks and Schultz back then.
If a Player doesn't get a contract offered, he becomes a Free Agent and is free to sign with any Team he wants. That's not compareable. It just isn't the same.
Hawks made their bed and were forced to lay it in. I see nothing unfair about it.