Brian39
Registered User
- Apr 24, 2014
- 7,491
- 14,016
To be pedantic, pick #22 is closer to the middle of the first round than the end. Not a huge difference, but it is 3 and 7 picks higher than our late 1sts.What do you see as Provorov‘s value? He returned a late 1st and a 2nd. I would have gladly paid that price for him.
I'm not sure what we would have needed to include to beat this offer without blowing it out of the water. Pick #22 is better than pick #25 (obviously) and I'm not sure that our 2024 2nd rounder is more valuable than the one Columbus sent. Even if we offered our 2024 2nd with no conditions to make it more appealing, I don't think it bridges the gap in value between pick #22 and pick #25.
Realistically, I think we would have needed to offer #25, our 2024 2nd, and one of the 3rd rounders we own this year (with LA offering the same stuff to Philly to retain the same amount). I'm not super crazy about that given that Provorov only has 2 years left under contract and that trade wouldn't have shed any of our LHD money.
I think we'd have needed to drastically change the makeup of this deal to get salary out the door to Philly and then the math becomes way different. If Krug (or even Scandella) is going the other way, then suddenly Philly is probably not as able/willing to take on as much dead money for LA. That means less value coming back to Philly from LA that needs to come out of our pocket.