Around the NHL 20-21 pt. 1: the season begins

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

joshjull

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
79,175
41,699
Hamburg,NY



If I understand this correctly. Keeping the cap flat due to escrow for fours years with a huge jump in TV revenue. That should certainly help teams get back on their feet financially.
 

Paxon

202? Stanley Cup Champions
Jul 13, 2003
29,030
5,264
Rochester, NY
for most people, that is really bad news. NHL TV is awesome.

for those of us that rely on NHL TV to watch the sabres.....THANK GOD
This sucks for me assuming Sabres games are blacked out in-market. I have access to the MSG app on my phone and tablet but not on my TV. I use LazyMan to watch games which uses the NHL.TV feeds directly. I actually have ESPN+, so if there are no blackouts then it's good for me. I guess I could use a proxy.
 

dotcommunism

Moderator
Aug 16, 2007
5,191
3,372
No idea why the Sharks are entering into Kane's mess

How would they void Kane's contract without a material breach, or is there a material breach they aren't specifying? They could buy him out, but then the creditors would go after it
If a player wants out of his contract, it's trivially easy for him to create a material breach, simply by not honoring the terms of his contract (that is, not playing, or reporting and so on).
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,105
38,670
Rochester, NY
NHL on ESPN: What the $2.8 billion deal means for the league, the salary cap and viewers

This won’t change the flat salary cap

Revenue is rising, so the salary cap will follow, right? Despite instant speculation on social media that this would be the case, Bettman confirmed in his media availability Wednesday that the cap would remain flat. One NHL source predicted that the flat cap could be in place for up to five seasons if Canadian teams aren’t able to get fans in the building for the start of the 2021-22 season.

The collective bargaining agreement that was negotiated and extended last summer included an uncoupling of hockey-related revenue and the salary cap. Escrow was set at a maximum of 20 percent, which the players are paying, plus a 10 percent deferral of salary, which will be paid back in Years 4 through 6 of the deal.

Because NHL buildings are mostly empty during the pandemic, hockey-related revenue is likely going to come in at around $2 billion this season, according to multiple sources. In the year before the pandemic, hockey-related revenue was $5 billion.

If the $2 billion figure holds, there will likely be an addition to the player’s escrow debt of close to $650 million on top of the escrow debt from 2019-20 season, which is carrying over at $250 million. It’s highly likely that the escrow debt in total for the players will be above $800 million.

That escrow debt needs to come out of revenue and be paid back to the league before the cap will start to rise again.
Among NHL agents, there seems to be a consensus that it will be at least two years before that escrow debt is paid back. One agent said every NHL team he’s spoken with has planned on each of the next two seasons having a flat salary cap, and some are even thinking about planning for a flat cap in the 2023-24 season.
 

Doug Prishpreed

Registered User
May 1, 2013
10,873
7,364
Brooklyn
I haven't watched Columbus at all this year, but do we really need another RHD? Seems like we're still good there after Montour leaves.

We could definitely use an upgrade at RD but any defenseman we give up assets for now will either be lost in the expansion draft, or will cause Joki to be lost.
 

Sabretooth

Registered User
May 14, 2013
3,104
646
Ohio
If NHL.tv isn’t an option, do we know yet if Center Ice is still available?
Isn't it disney that already runs nhl.tv after they acquired mlbam? That would make this essentially rebranding nhl.tv under espn+ wouldn't it? And since it is being presumed there's no additional cost above the cost of an espn+ membership and that is currently cheaper than nhl.tv, this seems like a good thing? Also with espn+/hulu having 75games / year streaming exclusive seems like it's going to be a lot better to just go with espn+ over center ice.

Center ice I would think will continue but a major benefit to getting center ice in recent years is that you could log in to nhl.tv with your center ice subscription. I'm doubtful that relationship will remain with being able to get the espn+ games with the center ice subscription, plus the streaming exclusive games likely will end up blacked out on center ice anyways like national games.

The streaming exclusive games are going to force an espn+ subscription on a lot of customers. The way I see it, that forces a decision on me to drop center ice. And center ice was the only thing keeping me on directv so that will go too.

The frustrating thing to me is, networks and cable companies have gone from suffering from cord cutting, to accelerating it with all these new pop up "plus" networks with exclusive content not shown on their cable channels. Seems they're encouraging cord cutting now. I don't understand that but probably some good reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Der Jaeger

PG Canuck

Registered User
Mar 29, 2010
63,544
25,575
Apperances in Playoffs:
Canucks 28
Sabres 29

Appearances past Round 1:
Canucks 12
Sabres 13

Appearances Past Round 2:
Canucks 4
Sabres 6

Appearances in Finals:
Canucks 3
Sabres 2

Longest Playoff Drought:
Canucks 4 years
Sabres 9 years (now will be 10)

Stanley Cups:
Do we even need to go there....

WE ARE TRULY BROTHERS
 

explore

I was wrong about Don Granato and TNT
Jun 28, 2011
3,752
3,434
  • Like
Reactions: brian_griffin

Ness

New Age Retro Hippie
Dec 5, 2008
3,712
737
Denver
Darryl Sutter wins his first game back as Flames coach. Must be nice to root for a team that has the balls to make a mid-season coaching change.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad