Imagine being stuck with that Nurse contract?McDavid scores 33rd, Oilers lose important divisional game after blowing a 2-0 lead. Looks good on them.
Imagine being stuck with that Nurse contract?McDavid scores 33rd, Oilers lose important divisional game after blowing a 2-0 lead. Looks good on them.
I think it's more so thst he doesn't keep his feet moving and glides around too much. I think his skating is fine in a vacuum but improving it to better than fine would help him create more separation.
Hard to say I wasn’t a big fan of Laf as a 1st overall at the time. I didn’t think he had any dynamic element to his game he was just nicely rounded and physically mature. I didn’t see that special element that would help him thrive in the NHL.
That being said he has been badly mismanaged and probably hasn’t done his part either. He might need a fresh start.
hard to pinpoint who is more at fault with Laf imo. frankly, i don't think anyone on here has enough info or details to say who has majority of the blame. Laf was a consensus 1st overall. can go through numerous rankings, or the 2020 draft thread it was rare to see him not at #1. did the org drop the ball? did the player not do what the org was saying?
NYR wasn't a traditional 1st overall selecting team either. they were 18th in the league and had v strong lw depth in panarin, kreider and buch ahead of him. he wasnt usurping any of them, even now with buchnevich gone.
perhaps. but if that's the case, then he likely would/should not have been the 1st overall? he was the consensus pick. and probably #1 regardless if it was NYR or not. so id say the chances regarless of the teams is that he probably still would've started in the nhl.I think Lafs biggest issue is he was a physically dominant player in a league that is easy to be physically dominant in. He was never truly elite at any one thing just a jack of all trades type of player. He could play physical, shoot decently well, had ok vision and passing and could stickhandle solidly enough. When his physical edge was removed he has struggled. He's no longer pushing his way through smaller players and because of that he hasn't really been able to adjust. Add onto that he was already kind of at his peak for his physical development.
Being picked 1st overall and being picked out of the CHL is so detrimental to some players development. It's very clear that he was to good for the Q but not quite good enough for the NHL. So in his D+1 he should have been in the AHL for probably even a season or two. But 1st overall picks are generally expected to make an impact right away and he can't go to the AHL so you end up with stuff like this.
I think it also has something to do with environment. Some guys have all the motivation within and don't get distracted. For others, living in Manhattan as a young, rich pro athlete could derail youI think Lafs biggest issue is he was a physically dominant player in a league that is easy to be physically dominant in. He was never truly elite at any one thing just a jack of all trades type of player. He could play physical, shoot decently well, had ok vision and passing and could stickhandle solidly enough. When his physical edge was removed he has struggled. He's no longer pushing his way through smaller players and because of that he hasn't really been able to adjust. Add onto that he was already kind of at his peak for his physical development.
Being picked 1st overall and being picked out of the CHL is so detrimental to some players development. It's very clear that he was to good for the Q but not quite good enough for the NHL. So in his D+1 he should have been in the AHL for probably even a season or two. But 1st overall picks are generally expected to make an impact right away and he can't go to the AHL so you end up with stuff like this.
In my opinion unless you are a generational talent, you shouldn't be in the NHL at 18. NHL should change the draft age to 19 or even 20.Exhibit 101 on how not to develop prospects and now they are stuck because he is waiver eligible.
I think Lafs biggest issue is he was a physically dominant player in a league that is easy to be physically dominant in. He was never truly elite at any one thing just a jack of all trades type of player. He could play physical, shoot decently well, had ok vision and passing and could stickhandle solidly enough. When his physical edge was removed he has struggled. He's no longer pushing his way through smaller players and because of that he hasn't really been able to adjust. Add onto that he was already kind of at his peak for his physical development.
Being picked 1st overall and being picked out of the CHL is so detrimental to some players development. It's very clear that he was to good for the Q but not quite good enough for the NHL. So in his D+1 he should have been in the AHL for probably even a season or two. But 1st overall picks are generally expected to make an impact right away and he can't go to the AHL so you end up with stuff like this.
What did they have to say about Seattle as a city? Too much rain and fog?
In my opinion unless you are a generational talent, you shouldn't be in the NHL at 18. NHL should change the draft age to 19 or even 20.
I think he’s gotta be done with the Rangers
No they would not. We have better players for much cheaper than him right now.
This is on the GM. It was either a poor draft choice or they have botched his development. Seems like a pattern with the Rangers.
On 32 thoughts Friedman was saying Gallant values consistency of effort above all from his players and Laf has struggled with that. Friedman also said Laf was benched late last season and responded with a great playoffs. Perhaps Gallant is trying to push those buttons again.
hard to pinpoint who is more at fault with Laf imo. frankly, i don't think anyone on here has enough info or details to say who has majority of the blame. Laf was a consensus 1st overall. can go through numerous rankings, or the 2020 draft thread it was rare to see him not at #1. did the org drop the ball? did the player not do what the org was saying?
NYR wasn't a traditional 1st overall selecting team either. they were 18th in the league and had v strong lw depth in panarin, kreider and buch ahead of him. he wasnt usurping any of them, even now with buchnevich gone.
I think Lafs biggest issue is he was a physically dominant player in a league that is easy to be physically dominant in. He was never truly elite at any one thing just a jack of all trades type of player. He could play physical, shoot decently well, had ok vision and passing and could stickhandle solidly enough. When his physical edge was removed he has struggled. He's no longer pushing his way through smaller players and because of that he hasn't really been able to adjust. Add onto that he was already kind of at his peak for his physical development.
Being picked 1st overall and being picked out of the CHL is so detrimental to some players development. It's very clear that he was to good for the Q but not quite good enough for the NHL. So in his D+1 he should have been in the AHL for probably even a season or two. But 1st overall picks are generally expected to make an impact right away and he can't go to the AHL so you end up with stuff like this.
perhaps. but if that's the case, then he likely would/should not have been the 1st overall? he was the consensus pick. and probably #1 regardless if it was NYR or not. so id say the chances regarless of the teams is that he probably still would've started in the nhl.
he did score 19 goals his 2nd year, w/o pp1 time, and w/ bottom-6 mins. was actually 2nd on the team in 5v5 goals. for a 1st overall probably expect more but given the situation/role id say it's fair production. he wasn't going to be vaulted in a position like stutzle for example where ottawa had weaker C depth. you have panarin (big contract), kreider (big contract, team leader) and buchnevich (another great player) who played LW so it was going to be uphill for him to get top-6 TOI+PP1.
I think it also has something to do with environment. Some guys have all the motivation within and don't get distracted. For others, living in Manhattan as a young, rich pro athlete could derail you
2020 NHL Entry Draft Picks at hockeydb.com
A sortable list of players drafted in the 2020 NHL Entry draft, including their career scoring after being draftedwww.hockeydb.com
Lafrenniere is the same draft year as Perfetti. A tale of two developments.
Would you do a trade straight up?
probably not.2020 NHL Entry Draft Picks at hockeydb.com
A sortable list of players drafted in the 2020 NHL Entry draft, including their career scoring after being draftedwww.hockeydb.com
Lafrenniere is the same draft year as Perfetti. A tale of two developments.
Would you do a trade straight up?
probably not.
i wonder how each stats would like if the roles were reversed.
perfetti playing primarily bottom-6 with chytil, kakko, etc
lafrenierre playing primarily top-6 with dubois, connor, scheifele etc
also it would take far less to acquire laf at this point.
OK I clearly said primarily not exclusively. Majority of the time he'd been a bottom 6er. we had an open top 6 wing spot and perfetti was clearly better than the likes of Barron, Appleton for instanceLaf has gotten multiple looks in the top 6 with Panerin and Z and hasn't been able to keep the spot. I think he's better than what he's show to date but he hasn't made the most of his opportunities.
probably not.
i wonder how each stats would like if the roles were reversed.
perfetti playing primarily bottom-6 with chytil, kakko, etc
lafrenierre playing primarily top-6 with dubois, connor, scheifele etc
also it would take far less to acquire laf at this point.
Imagine being stuck with that Nurse contract?
I would not. With what I've seen from both players so far, Perfetti is the more valuable player especially long term (Jets bias of course)2020 NHL Entry Draft Picks at hockeydb.com
A sortable list of players drafted in the 2020 NHL Entry draft, including their career scoring after being draftedwww.hockeydb.com
Lafrenniere is the same draft year as Perfetti. A tale of two developments.
Would you do a trade straight up?