no? your question is loaded and compounded in such a way that it leads the reply to it. you ask diff topics, yet lump them together and assume that the two parts are equal, which they aren't. the response is a more complex one. what ya wrote seems to be a false analogy fallacy as well as just consisting of loaded questions (as already discussed.)
you're also dodging that you cannot find what you asserted about my posts because I didn't write such content. that is the main point, which is why there is no tu quoque because in order for that to be applicable, what you claimed about what I argued needs to be evidenced and the case, which it isn't
what are you even trying to do here?
we're going back and forth on a forum about minutia. you seem to be deflecting hard and consistently after I initially wrote a rebuttal your post and elucidated upon the assumptions (and fallacies.) since then, your posts just keep going as they try to find some logical point to demonstrate and defend, yet they've yet to do so
I already explained the strawman at least once, including in the post of mine that ya just quoted
