Fair assessment. With Richards it’s always about looking at his time with the Kings in 2 parts.
He was a very good player for the Kings in 2012 and 2013, one of the best 2C's in the entire NHL. There is just no way the Kings win the SC in 2012 with either Stoll or 20 year old Schenn as the 2C. I'm not even sure they make the playoffs, to be honest. The intangible stuff can never be proven or disproven, but as a hockey player for those two years he was vitally important to the success of the team, to say that he wasn't is just a bad take.
However, I think many on this forum, even to this day, refuse to admit just how awful and worthless he was in the 2014 run. He was a below replacement player by that point, even the plays people like the bring up, the Girardi play was just an awful play that no NHL d-man should make, whether it's the first pre-season game or OT of the final. He played pretty regularly in 26 playoff games, he wasn't going to not do anything, but I challenge anyone to go back and watch those playoffs and still say the negative plays didn't greatly outnumber the positive ones. To say Richards was a vital part of 2 cup wins is another bad take.
The decision by the Kings to bring him back for 2014-2015 was one of the most short-sighted and awful moves any Kings GM has ever made.
The Kopitar stuff I’ve always found strange, even going back to the cup years many here didn’t really like him. Kopitar and Richards are really not 2 players who should be compared. Kopitar was more Drew Brees and Richards was Matt Ryan.