DryIslandBartender
KCCO
- Jun 30, 2006
- 5,632
- 2,520
What does Richards have to do with Kopitar’s career?my favorite are the people who shit on kopitar but have this absurd hard on for mike richards
What does Richards have to do with Kopitar’s career?my favorite are the people who shit on kopitar but have this absurd hard on for mike richards
I think he's referring to some people who have expressed their desire that Kopitar played with more of an edge like old time hockey stud Mike Richards and stop being such a Euro-pansy, etc.What does Richards have to do with Kopitar’s career?
Neither has their name on the Cup without the either.my favorite are the people who shit on kopitar but have this absurd hard on for mike richards
Ty Smith would of be a nice target for LD. Needs some work but he is still young.
me toomy favorite are the people who shit on kopitar but have this absurd hard on for mike richards
More rewriting history. Have we forgotten Terry Murray -- who "pushed and prodded him to learn how to play a full, 200-foot game." He didn't come into the league that way he he had defense first beat into him.Kopitar's point totals are reflective of the style of game he has chosen to play. He wasn't sentenced to two way wingers. He wasn't asked or forced to play pessimistic, safety-first hockey, he does so by choice. Its who he is.
He is a 90 point player who chose a 60 point style. Offensive wingers have to adapt to him, and most don't have the mindset to do so.
Anze likes to play with Iafallo. One way cheaters, which are 90% of offensive wingers, leave far too many gaps in coverage and it negates all the hard work he does down low. Anze wants safe, conscientious, reliable wingers. That's all there is to it.
Crawford let the boys freewheel all they wanted while he was in charge. Of course he was pretty much a garbage coach by then.
And of course Mr. Build From The Net Out hired the guy that forced boring hockey. Kopitar had to be forced into being a system player. Just like Byfield has to be forced into it. Turcotte. Kaliyev. Kupari. System, system, system. I guess maybe if Byfield was getting ice time, maybe we wouldn't care if the offense wasn't there. At least he'd be playing into a boring 200 foot player.
Except they ended up winning before, so we don't really care how it happened. It's even hard to imagine the conversations we would have today if 2012 doesn't go down the way it did. One of those alternate history scenarios that just make you go, get outta here, that's crazy.
Your narrative as usual makes no sense because you ignore inconvenient facts. Before hiring the boring coach, a no defense screamer was in charge. And then an intense mind games master was brought in. Lombardi hired the right guy for each stage of the roster.
And of course you have nothing to say about the current coach who was hired to install an offensive system, which no one brings up anymore because it didn’t happen. Instead all the speed on the roster is used to play the 1-3-1. And the team is great defensively while struggling to score goals. But the team made the playoffs so no one cares how it happened.
In ten years, you’ll be telling us that the Kings never won any cups. You’ll go from revisionist historian to full on moon landing never happened conspirator.
Devils have definitely improved this off-season - @Brodeur would be pleased I think.
It was failing until it wasn't? So, in other words it was a huge success and the Kings enjoyed the best three seasons of their entire existence under Lombardi. I am sure that is where you were going with this in your own roundabout way.Crawford was the right guy? Did anyone really like that hire when it happened? Does that mean Cloutier was the right goalie at the right time?
Danault, Kempe, have had their best seasons under TM. Doughty was on pace for his best numbers last year. Iafallo has had his best years. Moore.
As I've said, and obviously it's not my original thought, but winning cures all. Win, and nothing else matters. You can miss badly on a 4th overall pick, and nobody holds it against you. Same way if the Kings win any time soon, and Turcotte isn't part of it, we'll never mention Turcotte again. Until they win though, Turcotte will be held up as a prime example of a GM that doesn't know what he's doing.
My narrative is that I wish we could go back to 2010, 2011, something like that, and re-live the sense of angst that I am almost positive had to have existed at the time. Ryan Smyth was an answer at some point. He wasn't acquired just to kill time until the unavailable better player became available. Terry Murray was the coach of a contender. Sutter wasn't part of a grand plan. If you don't think Murray is a Cup coach, you fire him in the summer of 2011. You don't wait until the team is barely hanging on to make a change.
We don't give Blake the same leeway that we've ended up giving Lombardi, because we don't like him. Robitaille even less. We don't like the former player nepotism, but always forget that when DL was feeling the heat, he turned to an old friend to save his job. Not some coach he didn't have connections with, but went with the familiar.
It's not that the Kings never won the Cup, it's that it seems like a perfect plan today, but in the moment, it was anything but. How close were they to wasting a 1st rd pick on a guy that scored 9 goals in 84 games? Again, like Smyth, Penner was an answer, and it was failing. Until it wasn't.
Yeah, knee jerk reaction is that the trade helps us in the short term. I have some worries in general about trading a 22 year old D. Thought we'd stick with Smith for another year and hope he had a bounceback season. It seemed inevitable that he'd be the odd man out once Luke Hughes signs next spring. I thought drafting Simon Nemec crushed the chances of the Devils re-signing Damon Severson, but after getting Marino it really seems unlikely. We'll see if Severson ends up being a trade chip. Maybe pipe dream scenario is Severson+ for J.T. Miller.
We'll see if Vanecek/Blackwood can give us league average goaltending. It's sad that most Devils fans have lowered expectations after last season's trainwreck in the crease.
Devils were league average-ish is GF but with the 28th ranked PP. Hopefully Andrew Brunette can help that out the power play. Part of it was missing Hughes and Hamilton for large chunks of the season but we were sorely missing a net front guy. Out of desperation, 4th liner Nathan Bastian was used on PP1 for stretches just to be a big body.
2022-23 D:
Graves-Hamilton
Siegenthaler-Severson
B.Smith-Marino
2023-24 D:
Siegenathaler-Hamilton
Hughes-Marino
B.Smith/Bahl/Okhotiuk-Nemec
It'll be risky breaking in two (possibly three) rookie D next season. Hopefully Bahl/Okhotiuk can have a smooth transition with their AHL seasoning. Org seems to like Bahl more, but I've preferred Okhotiuk albeit he's only had a handful of NHL games.
It was failing until it wasn't? So, in other words it was a huge success and the Kings enjoyed the best three seasons of their entire existence under Lombardi. I am sure that is where you were going with this in your own roundabout way.
Kopitar actually showed flashes of a top 6 forward this last season. Let's hope he builds on that.I think he's referring to some people who have expressed their desire that Kopitar played with more of an edge like old time hockey stud Mike Richards and stop being such a Euro-pansy, etc.
Here's the thing: Richards was great! We probably don't beat Vancouver in 2012 without him and as invisible as he was for much of the 2014 run, he did score some clutch goals in the playoffs (the one in game 7 v ANA comes to mind immediately).
He was also out of the league after a decade due directly and indirectly to his style of play, his last two seasons being sad, wet farts. Meanwhile, Kopitar is still playing, putting up .85ppg, and leading his team in ways both quantifiable and not. I guess it depends on your definition of stud, but I know who I'd take to build a team around. I bet most Philly fans would agree too, as would HoF voters.
FTR: I'm hoping Richie is brought back to Staples one night to honor all his contributions to those years. He was an integral part of it.
That's a GM doing critical evaluation of a situation, making the necessary changes, and being prepared to take advantage of opportunities as they presented themselves.$15m tied up in 29 and 31 year old big name free agents, before ever sniffing the playoffs. 3rd worst record, or 2nd worst without Sea, over the last 4 years. Crazy how teams try to be better.
Yes. And they were 17th overall, and 9th in the West, the day before Carter got here. That's 60 games into their true contender year. That's the plan working as planned, I guess.
Crawford was the right guy? Did anyone really like that hire when it happened? Does that mean Cloutier was the right goalie at the right time?
Danault, Kempe, have had their best seasons under TM. Doughty was on pace for his best numbers last year. Iafallo has had his best years. Moore.
As I've said, and obviously it's not my original thought, but winning cures all. Win, and nothing else matters. You can miss badly on a 4th overall pick, and nobody holds it against you. Same way if the Kings win any time soon, and Turcotte isn't part of it, we'll never mention Turcotte again. Until they win though, Turcotte will be held up as a prime example of a GM that doesn't know what he's doing.
My narrative is that I wish we could go back to 2010, 2011, something like that, and re-live the sense of angst that I am almost positive had to have existed at the time. Ryan Smyth was an answer at some point. He wasn't acquired just to kill time until the unavailable better player became available. Terry Murray was the coach of a contender. Sutter wasn't part of a grand plan. If you don't think Murray is a Cup coach, you fire him in the summer of 2011. You don't wait until the team is barely hanging on to make a change.
We don't give Blake the same leeway that we've ended up giving Lombardi, because we don't like him. Robitaille even less. We don't like the former player nepotism, but always forget that when DL was feeling the heat, he turned to an old friend to save his job. Not some coach he didn't have connections with, but went with the familiar.
It's not that the Kings never won the Cup, it's that it seems like a perfect plan today, but in the moment, it was anything but. How close were they to wasting a 1st rd pick on a guy that scored 9 goals in 84 games? Again, like Smyth, Penner was an answer, and it was failing. Until it wasn't.