Around the League Thread | Ixnay on Zerplanyay

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
27,997
10,749
Yager has way more value than Lekkerimaki.
C over wingers. Similar size as well. And Lekky doesn't project to be elite like a Pasta or other high end winger. Roughly about the same upside, but based on position, better to take the C if offered.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
27,997
10,749
Well, he got his wish and got out of Win. Cost him an ELC year that he has to play under vs burning it off last season and hitting RFA at 22 vs 23.
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,139
15,568
Yager has way more value than Lekkerimaki.
Until Yager wins the MVP at the World Jr. Hockey Championships, he has 'less value' than Lekkerimaki......Unlike Yager who played as a junior in the WHL last season, Lekkerimaki actually scored 19 goals as a teenager playing in the Top Tier SHL, a full-on men's professional league.

It's always baffled me how kids playing in the CHL, instantly become better prospects, just because they were draft picks in the top-half of the first round.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,511
16,760
Victoria
Until Yager wins the MVP at the World Jr. Hockey Championships, he has 'less value' than Lekkerimaki......Unlike Yager who played as a junior in the WHL last season, Lekkerimaki actually scored 19 goals as a teenager playing in the Top Tier SHL, a full-on men's professional league.

It's always baffled me how kids playing in the CHL, instantly become better prospects, just because they were draft picks in the top-half of the first round.
Idk, I think it's pretty reasonable to have Lekk and Yager in the same prospect tier, and then to weigh C>W in value.

I'm not saying AINEC! but it's a reasonable position to have Yager>Lekk.

I've always personally been skeptical of Lekk's playstyle myself.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,511
16,760
Victoria
So are we gonna talk about how now two high end american prospects have essentially done the weakest thing in hockey

what is with these prospects straight up Ghosting organizations
I mean McGroarty had his "advisor" be his communicator, but even that dude was Ghosting the jets LOL
Gauthier was running from Briere at the world juniors, taking no calls, blocking texts, trying anything to get a quick face-to-face after practice or quick coffee.

Straight up text to the GM saying:
"i dont want to get into a whole long thing, and I appreciate you taking interest and drafting me and the resources you put into me, but at this point and after talking with my family I think it is best if you seek to trade me to another organization. You can have potential trade partners contact me with parameters"
I don't really have an opinion one way or the other. Guys don't want to stay in an org for 7+ years they had no say in choosing. They're using the leverage given to them in the CBA. Fair is fair.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
27,997
10,749
I don't really have an opinion one way or the other. Guys don't want to stay in an org for 7+ years they had no say in choosing. They're using the leverage given to them in the CBA. Fair is fair.
I do wonder if Burke back in his day would let the kid just stay in college and use up all 4 ncaa years to make the player finish elc at age 24 (only 2 year elc for a 22 year old) if they didn't want to sign after their So. year and thus hit RFA at 22. Costing 2 years and maybe over $10 million to the player.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,073
89,458
Vancouver, BC
Idk, I think it's pretty reasonable to have Lekk and Yager in the same prospect tier, and then to weigh C>W in value.

I'm not saying AINEC! but it's a reasonable position to have Yager>Lekk.

I've always personally been skeptical of Lekk's playstyle myself.

Also they 'both went 14th overall' but one was in a terrible draft and one was in an absolutely stacked draft.

Yager goes top-10 in 2022 and JL is in the 20s in 2023.
 

credulous

Registered User
Nov 18, 2021
3,806
5,063
I do wonder if Burke back in his day would let the kid just stay in college and use up all 4 ncaa years to make the player finish elc at age 24 (only 2 year elc for a 22 year old) if they didn't want to sign after their So. year and thus hit RFA at 22. Costing 2 years and maybe over $10 million to the player.

you don't have to wonder you can just google rj umberger
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

pitseleh

Registered User
Jul 30, 2005
19,298
3,088
Vancouver
Also they 'both went 14th overall' but one was in a terrible draft and one was in an absolutely stacked draft.

Yager goes top-10 in 2022 and JL is in the 20s in 2023.
Do you think he goes ahead of Savoie in 2022? Don’t have an informed opinion, but from what I’ve seen he’s not particularly big or fast, he gets the two-way label but doesn’t seem to have a reputation as a great defensive player, and while his point totals are solid it looks like he’s been the third or fourth most important offensive player on his teams the last couple years. Not a bad prospect but not particularly exciting either.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,073
89,458
Vancouver, BC
Do you think he goes ahead of Savoie in 2022? Don’t have an informed opinion, but from what I’ve seen he’s not particularly big or fast, he gets the two-way label but doesn’t seem to have a reputation as a great defensive player, and while his point totals are solid it looks like he’s been the third or fourth most important offensive player on his teams the last couple years. Not a bad prospect but not particularly exciting either.

Yes, I think he would have gone ahead of Savoie in 2022. Not really sure why Savoie went that high to begin with.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: wetcoast

pitseleh

Registered User
Jul 30, 2005
19,298
3,088
Vancouver
Yes, I think he would have gone ahead of Savoie in 2022. Not really sure why Savoie went that high to begin with.
I must have misremembered - thought you like Savoie that year.

What do you see Yager’s projection as in the NHL?
 
Last edited:

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,073
89,458
Vancouver, BC
I must have misremembered - thought you like Savoie that year.

What do you see Yager’s projection as in the NHL?

I liked Savoie relative to that draft but I’ve also changed how I value prospects over the past couple years and I wouldn’t rate a 5’9 guy who projected as a winger as highly as I did then.

Yager probably projects as a 2C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pitseleh

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,511
16,760
Victoria
I do wonder if Burke back in his day would let the kid just stay in college and use up all 4 ncaa years to make the player finish elc at age 24 (only 2 year elc for a 22 year old) if they didn't want to sign after their So. year and thus hit RFA at 22. Costing 2 years and maybe over $10 million to the player.
Ehh I guess you could do that to be petty. Still doesn't benefit the drafting club.

Going that route just means you end up with no asset. WPG ended up with Yager. That's a better outcome.
Also they 'both went 14th overall' but one was in a terrible draft and one was in an absolutely stacked draft.

Yager goes top-10 in 2022 and JL is in the 20s in 2023.
I'm probably lower on Yager than consensus. He's a small-ish center and I don't think he has any "elite" traits. Moreso just acknowledging there is a legit case to believe Yager>Lekk.
 
Last edited:

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
27,997
10,749

Askarov officially a shark. Basically, it's the main pieces of the Hertl to LV trade headed to Nash.

Edstrom whom LV took in 2023 and LV's 25 first (plus a swap of minor leaguers from the ECHL) and a 3rd back to SJ.

So 2 late 1sts (most likely for '25) for like the 11OA pick in 2020.
 

God

Free Citizen
Apr 2, 2007
10,612
8,114
Vancouver
That's a good trade for San Jose.

I still don't really know what Nashville is doing. Seemed like a natural transition to go from Saros to Askarov, and I think they probably could've secured a late 1st at last year's deadline for him.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
27,997
10,749
That's a good trade for San Jose.

I still don't really know what Nashville is doing. Seemed like a natural transition to go from Saros to Askarov, and I think they probably could've secured a late 1st at last year's deadline for him.
Well, given that the PG kid who took the job from Young is eligible for the '25 draft, puts Nash in a good position to take him and reset their goalie timeline as they would have Sarros for another 8 years after this season. Would give the kid plenty of time to develop and then secure backup job and then deal with Sarros final 3 years or so at that point in time.

No goalie went round 1 this past draft. first one off the board was at #38.
 

God

Free Citizen
Apr 2, 2007
10,612
8,114
Vancouver
Well, given that the PG kid who took the job from Young is eligible for the '25 draft, puts Nash in a good position to take him and reset their goalie timeline as they would have Sarros for another 8 years after this season. Would give the kid plenty of time to develop and then secure backup job and then deal with Sarros final 3 years or so at that point in time.

No goalie went round 1 this past draft. first one off the board was at #38.
Betting on taking a player in a future draft and handing an 8-year contract to a 29-year old goalie instead of going with the prospect you developed and who has exceeded expectations would certainly be... a choice. It simply looks like they're putting all of their chips in for a playoff push with old players. I've only ever seen the early 2000s Rangers do this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bossram and Vector

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,511
16,760
Victoria
I think Grier's vision is starting to take shape. Celebrini + Askarov hopefully, for SJ, gives them franchise building blocks at each end of the ice.

I think it's a touch too heavy of a price for goalie, but I think it's a decent gamble for SJ. Nashville and Askarov basically agreed his time there was done, and they get a couple first-round equivalents they can cash in for deadline upgrades. Fine for both sides.

My lukewarm take is that I don't think SJ is actually the worst team in the league anymore.

Betting on taking a player in a future draft and handing an 8-year contract to a 29-year old goalie instead of going with the prospect you developed and who has exceeded expectations would certainly be... a choice. It simply looks like they're putting all of their chips in for a playoff push with old players. I've only ever seen the early 2000s Rangers do this.
Agreed. I don't think Nashville's direction is smart. At best, they can make a run in the next 1-3 years. At worst, they gunked their cap sheet for years, jump-started a managed decline into mediocrity, and aren't even better in year 1.
 

SeawaterOnIce

Bald is back in style.
Sponsor
Aug 28, 2011
17,480
21,873
Betting on taking a player in a future draft and handing an 8-year contract to a 29-year old goalie instead of going with the prospect you developed and who has exceeded expectations would certainly be... a choice. It simply looks like they're putting all of their chips in for a playoff push with old players. I've only ever seen the early 2000s Rangers do this.

I see the rationale. The franchise has delivered a rather bland boring product since their inception. They had that exciting cup run in 2017 but there's never really been a belief they could do anything meaningful in the playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wetcoast

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
27,997
10,749
I see the rationale. The franchise has delivered a rather bland boring product since their inception. They had that exciting cup run in 2017 but there's never really been a belief they could do anything meaningful in the playoffs.
Nash/Car seem similar in that they want consistency year to year over ups and downs.
Betting on taking a player in a future draft and handing an 8-year contract to a 29-year old goalie instead of going with the prospect you developed and who has exceeded expectations would certainly be... a choice. It simply looks like they're putting all of their chips in for a playoff push with old players. I've only ever seen the early 2000s Rangers do this.

I find it puzzling as well. And not like he had he deal done, they just signed it in the summer with Sarros. But, Trotz wasn't around in 2020 when Poile made the Askarov pick.

Good move by SJ, that only came around because of Nash's decision to go with Sarros. Otherwise, they are behind on a goalie for that team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wetcoast

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
26,152
43,440
Junktown
I appreciate Trotz's "f*** it, we ball!" attitude even if I don't think it's going to lead them to a cup or much long term success. The slow and steady pace the franchise is known hasn't really lead to much either.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,511
16,760
Victoria
I appreciate Trotz's "f*** it, we ball!" attitude even if I don't think it's going to lead them to a cup or much long term success. The slow and steady pace the franchise is known hasn't really lead to much either.
The thing is last season I think they were on an *upward* trajectory that could have reasonably been maintained for some time. Now they've basically given themselves 3 years at most to win, before the wheels completely fall off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BimJenning
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad