Obviously talking about QB and Turcotte, sorry for the typo. But you could have added the numbers.
There are proven and successful ways to handle prospects like QB and Turcotte. The Kings went against those and the results have been horrible.
You truly believe other teams would have handled QB, Turcotte and Bjornfot the same?
Wasn't sure, and in the morning rush...wasn't looking at it that closely....
Other teams would have had different situations, so who knows, there's not many teams that have a Kopitar as a 1C...so those that don't, those that aren't concerned about winning right away, are going to make different decisions....just look at Zegras in Anaheim....he started in Anaheim, then got sent down to the AHL....had Getzlaf there, Getzlaf retired, Zegras took over, because A. Getzlaf retired, and B. there was ZERO expectation of winning..
Again....do all prospects develop the same way? The answer of course is no......so each team has to take an individual tactic in that prospects development,
Tell me why Anderson only played 53 games in the AHL vs Bjornfot's 95? Kaliyev's 40 vs Byfield's 95.....etc
If LA had the narrative of, you do this, then this, then this, and then this.....and each this is a step in the ladder, wouldn't most all prospects hover around the same # of games played etc?
I'm not arguing right or wrong....I'm saying that the narrative you think they have, the numbers 100% do not add up to it.....If they did, Kaliyev would have more than 40 games, Vilardi would have more than 45, all of our prospects, Kaliyev, QB, Turcotte, Bjornfot, Anderson, JAD, etc, every last one of them would have more AHL games than NHL games...and they would all be around the same amount.