Around the league part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

Herby

How could Blake have known?
Feb 27, 2002
26,799
17,027
Great Lakes Area
1675556782006.png
 

kingsboy11

Maestro
Dec 14, 2011
12,035
8,951
USA
watched it for about 5 minutes and saw Adam Fox just wave his stick at a player going on a breakaway and thought what's the point of these anymore. Players don't even try to hide the fact that they don't care.
 

Sol

Smile
Jun 30, 2017
24,506
20,636
This is the first time ever I have it watched any of the games or skills competition.


On an unrelated note, I was curious to see when the Islanders stopped paying Dipietros buyout…and they haven’t… they’re paying him 1.5 million until 2029. He was bought out in 2013. Imagine getting that much money a year doing zero.
 

Kurrilino

Go Stoll Go
Aug 6, 2005
8,834
2,208
Calgary
Change the all star thing to something completely different, take the hockey out of it and do something different. Market the player’s personalities. Have the teams decide who goes. one year it’s a poker tournament, the next is golf, make it an east vs west softball game, a fishing tournament. I don’t know. But what it is now is crap
The solution is simple.

Go back to West vs East and the winner conference gets the home advantage in the Stanley Cup final.
This would turn it into a serious competition with impact and meaning beyond pride.
 

kilowatt

the vibes are not immaculate
Jan 1, 2009
18,682
21,753
Horvat’s only a year older than Fiala, and we just did essentially the same thing the Islanders did. I think we’re closer to competing though, with a much better prospect pool.
 

KingsFan7824

Registered User
Dec 4, 2003
19,528
7,602
Visit site
That's the business. You will give out bad contracts if you want any sort of talent. Then you'll be stuck with that guy, good or bad, because you will have to give out all that term.
 

AbsentMojo

F-ing get up and hunt! Cmon Todd!
Apr 18, 2018
9,926
10,171
twitter.com

AbsentMojo

F-ing get up and hunt! Cmon Todd!
Apr 18, 2018
9,926
10,171
twitter.com
That's the business. You will give out bad contracts if you want any sort of talent. Then you'll be stuck with that guy, good or bad, because you will have to give out all that term.
You do those deals if you think whatever core you have is going to rot by time you could develop the same.. 8 years is a long time.. when does ever work out well? but as you said you couldnt get him otherwise - pretty much Lou L's lament.
 

Herby

How could Blake have known?
Feb 27, 2002
26,799
17,027
Great Lakes Area
It is a bit amusing that the fans who complain about the 8 year contracts going to age 35-36 also don’t like the 8 year deals guys sign at 22 because they supposedly haven’t proven enough.

I still think the 3 year ELC into the 8 year deal is the best for everyone involved when it comes to higher end guys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YP44

King'sPawn

Enjoy the chaos
Jul 1, 2003
22,921
23,485
It is a bit amusing that the fans who complain about the 8 year contracts going to age 35-36 also don’t like the 8 year deals guys sign at 22 because they supposedly haven’t proven enough.

I still think the 3 year ELC into the 8 year deal is the best for everyone involved when it comes to higher end guys.
That's an interesting observation.

Honestly I'd like there to be a cap at 5 years. I think it protects the teams from committing too long, and there will be fewer players tied down for too long so teams can afford raises for the players.
 

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
20,997
17,923
That's an interesting observation.

Honestly I'd like there to be a cap at 5 years. I think it protects the teams from committing too long, and there will be fewer players tied down for too long so teams can afford raises for the players.
I guess the counter argument would be that those long term contracts actually save teams money sometimes. It allows teams to lock up their young stars and give them cost certainty.

If the Oilers couldn't lock up McDavid for 8 years, he'd end up costing them even more money I think.

Maybe the 5 year cap should just be on UFA contracts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fat Elvis

LAKings88

Formerly KOTR
Dec 4, 2006
14,073
6,392
Blackhole
I wish there was a buyout clause built into contracts or the team gets one every four years. I know the players wouldn’t accept it but as a fan it would be nice to save the team from a bad gm mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raccoon Jesus

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,429
66,377
I.E.
I wish there was a buyout clause built into contracts or the team gets one every four years. I know the players wouldn’t accept it but as a fan it would be nice to save the team from a bad gm mistake.

It's also why GMs keep doing it. By the time they're done trying to save their job with bad deals, it's someone else's mess.
 

AbsentMojo

F-ing get up and hunt! Cmon Todd!
Apr 18, 2018
9,926
10,171
twitter.com
Imagine choosing JT Miller over Bo Horvat.

I may feel bad for Van fans for the first time in recorded history.
If they knew they couldnt sign both, why go for Miller? I read they low balled him and he declined so they locked up Miller instead of negotiating further. Thats a franchise in a free fall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raccoon Jesus

ScoreZeGoals

Boooorrrrriiiinnnnng
Jun 29, 2010
17,641
7,602
Imagine choosing JT Miller over Bo Horvat.

I may feel bad for Van fans for the first time in recorded history.
Am I the only one who thinks Miller is the better player? Horvat is a good player, but he's riding a ridiculously unsustainable 21.7% shooting percentage, and his career high is 61 points. Miller had 99 points last season while Horvat had 52 on the same team. I'd be terrified of that Horvat contract as I feel they are paying UFA PPG player market value for what's very likely a 60 point player on a hot shooting streak
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raccoon Jesus

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,351
7,687
Calgary, AB
I agree with Torts, glad it is over and hockey can start again.
If the league insists on having an all star game, put it right before the start of the season

Am I the only one who thinks Miller is the better player? Horvat is a good player, but he's riding a ridiculously unsustainable 21.7% shooting percentage, and his career high is 61 points. Miller had 99 points last season while Horvat had 52 on the same team. I'd be terrified of that Horvat contract as I feel they are paying UFA PPG player market value for what's very likely a 60 point player on a hot shooting streak
Horvat is having a career year offensively but he is better defensively than miller, and I often think Miller is a better winger than center. Rather pay the center.
 

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,429
66,377
I.E.
Am I the only one who thinks Miller is the better player? Horvat is a good player, but he's riding a ridiculously unsustainable 21.7% shooting percentage, and his career high is 61 points. Miller had 99 points last season while Horvat had 52 on the same team. I'd be terrified of that Horvat contract as I feel they are paying UFA PPG player market value for what's very likely a 60 point player on a hot shooting streak

he's the better offensive player but he's also a lot older and a bit of a shithead

Bo can play great two way hockey and character beyond reproach

It's an easy call for me, there's a reason even great teams like TBL / NYR were done with miller in short order
 

KingsFan7824

Registered User
Dec 4, 2003
19,528
7,602
Visit site
If they knew they couldnt sign both, why go for Miller? I read they low balled him and he declined so they locked up Miller instead of negotiating further. Thats a franchise in a free fall.

Miller had already had his career year, and Van was still riding that huge Bruce bounce they had in the 2nd half last year when they signed the contract in Sept. No team.is getting rid of Miller in that scenario. That carry over thing that every team always thinks is going to work out. Then not only do they suck, but Horvat has his career year this year.

If the Canucks had been decent this year, they re-sign Horvat. But they've been so bad, and so much media pressure is hanging over them, that it messes everything up.

So much of this stuff is about timing. Most moves are done based on where a team is today, not 3 years from now. Meaning the shorter the contract, the better, but the cap pretty much forces you to hand out 7/8 year deals to your best guys, since the AAV is based on the length of term, so you front load the contract as much as you can, and worry about years 5-8 later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AbsentMojo
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad