- Jul 7, 2017
- 3,196
- 12,074
Ah, so it's sounding like he didn't bet on any NHL games. But he himself gave insider information to someone else, who bet on games using that info?
Which isn't illegal but the NHL has to keep their new
Ah, so it's sounding like he didn't bet on any NHL games. But he himself gave insider information to someone else, who bet on games using that info?
The NHL said in its release he didn't bet on NHL games.
So does his suspension begin after he signs?
That is logical, but i haven't paid close enough attention to anything to see it explicitly stated.
No. Game 1 of the season
I think this should be the case. Maybe even get a cap rebate!So, if the Sens accrue enough cap without signing him for half the season, can they theoretically sign him post-suspension to a decent one year deal and not have to move someone? Where the cap gurus at?
If the Sens sign him now, his cap hit does not count, so as long as there is room at the time the suspension is over, all should be good.I think this should be the case. Maybe even get a cap rebate!
Apparently … they *don’t* have to sign him by Dec 1 and he can still play this season.If the Sens sign him now, his cap hit does not count, so as long as there is room at the time the suspension is over, all should be good.
This is why I’m questioning this, it’s a way for the NHL to allow the Sens to circumvent the Cap and get Pinto under contract prior to 1 December
If the Sens sign him now, his cap hit does not count, so as long as there is room at the time the suspension is over, all should be good.
This is why I’m questioning this, it’s a way for the NHL to allow the Sens to circumvent the Cap and get Pinto under contract prior to 1 December
It’s because he’s a 10.2(c) RFA.Apparently … they *don’t* have to sign him by Dec 1 and he can still play this season.
I think Friedman reported that earlier today.
Ducks beat the Bruins
Very moving, very moving. Been a long hard day up here. Bruins might make a fan out of me yet.
All the Lafreniere hate in the off-season and he has4 goals already
From an objective pov, the Bruins are a great organization that's run really well, are really closely tied to the community, do genuine work to support the community, and have a ton of great people. But they employ Captain Lickitung, and have a very hatable owner. But their real crime is winning too much. I'd love them if I were a Bostonian, but the good teams inspire hate because that's sports.
FWIW, I still hate the Bruins. As a hockey fan, it's the only correct thing.
Nah, their fans are some of the most egotistical pricks in existence...they're shit-talkers who can give it but not take itFrom an objective pov, the Bruins are a great organization that's run really well, are really closely tied to the community, do genuine work to support the community, and have a ton of great people. But they employ Captain Lickitung, and have a very hatable owner. But their real crime is winning too much. I'd love them if I were a Bostonian, but the good teams inspire hate because that's sports.
FWIW, I still hate the Bruins. As a hockey fan, it's the only correct thing.
I mean they've been listening to Jack Edwards for decades. At this point, that kind of behavior is by designNah, their fans are some of the most egotistical pricks in existence...they're shit-talkers who can give it but not take it
You and yours ok? Got to be terrifying. I have a bunch of cousins in that area, but fortunately I think they are all ok.Oh yeah, I still get all that. But living here in Lewiston, I may have to give in after all.
5-1 lossPicked up tickets for tonight....looked at Sharks lineup. Christ that forward group might be the worst I've seen in a minute
more of a boston thing... I know plenty of boston sports fans who don't give a crap about hockey and are the same as bruins fans, or worseI mean they've been listening to Jack Edwards for decades. At this point, that kind of behavior is by design
You and yours ok? Got to be terrifying. I have a bunch of cousins in that area, but fortunately I think they are all ok.