raynman
Registered User
- Jan 20, 2013
- 5,058
- 11,173
One of my most controversial takes is that I love the wave. So dumb but so fun. Listening to it and seeing it on tv with all the woos is fantastic.Start with the wave
One of my most controversial takes is that I love the wave. So dumb but so fun. Listening to it and seeing it on tv with all the woos is fantastic.Start with the wave
And here I thought it was because Russia was caught in a nation-wide, Russian Olympic committee supported doping/steroid scandal where Russian athletes were not allowed to participate as part of their own country?If they are not political, why don't they play the Russian anthem at the olympics the last few years?
you mean literally the devilAnd a gangster.
Yeah.
Come on guys, I'm not going to start deleting posts, but let's not get into the LGBT politics, Russia, and such. We all know how it ends EVERY. f***ING. TIME.
I ended up doing it. weird thing is I legitimately don't have a problem with political discussion most of the time.Yeah.
Come on guys, I'm not going to start deleting posts, but let's not get into the LGBT politics, Russia, and such. We all know how it ends EVERY. f***ING. TIME.
Well, in non-political Around the League news, the Florida/Toronto game was horribly officiated, and it apparently stemmed from a long-standing feud between Paul Maurice and Francios St. Laurent
St. Laurent was the official that was caught laughing/joking when Brian Little broke his vertebrate, which set Maurice off. And eventually led to St. Laurent kicking Maurice out of the game.
Makes me wonder if ol' RBA might have a few unhappy referees looking to make calls against his team.
Well, in non-political Around the League news, the Florida/Toronto game was horribly officiated, and it apparently stemmed from a long-standing feud between Paul Maurice and Francios St. Laurent
St. Laurent was the official that was caught laughing/joking when Brian Little broke his vertebrate, which set Maurice off. And eventually led to St. Laurent kicking Maurice out of the game.
Makes me wonder if ol' RBA might have a few unhappy referees looking to make calls against his team.
I wonder about the loss ratio for them. If they continue to give out speculative loans to guys like Lehner and Kane, I assume they must give out a lot of loans to guys that do pay it all back a rather high rates, because they are going to take a large loss in bankruptcy with those guys.
LolMost of them are power tripping pieces of shit, who can absolutely wreck a game for a team, and do so intentionally on a regular basis. Most are also probably jealous they weren't good enough to play.
I don't know about you guys but I have found out that my preferred way of rebellling against unpleasant assignments (when they such be) is by absurdly overdoing it.I do wonder if any of us, in our daily jobs, were told "hey on Tuesday you have to wear x because we're celebrating x that day"...how would we respond? July 4th they tell you you MUST wear red, white, & blue? It's military appreciate day so wear some camo, or clothing advertising your favorite military branch. Tomorrow you wear a rainbow shirt for inclusion day. We're celebrating all our neighbors who celebrate religion X, wear something to show your support of X
If someone wants to pay me 6mil a year and 3 or 4 times out of 41 I have to wear something supporting a cause (that is a worthwhile cause)? I mean, that ain't that bad.I do wonder if any of us, in our daily jobs, were told "hey on Tuesday you have to wear x because we're celebrating x that day"...how would we respond? July 4th they tell you you MUST wear red, white, & blue? It's military appreciate day so wear some camo, or clothing advertising your favorite military branch. Tomorrow you wear a rainbow shirt for inclusion day. We're celebrating all our neighbors who celebrate religion X, wear something to show your support of X
But what if it's not something YOU deem "a worthwhile cause"?If someone wants to pay me 6mil a year and 3 or 4 times out of 41 I have to wear something supporting a cause (that is a worthwhile cause)? I mean, that ain't that bad.
Well as long as it's not a cause that supports outright bigotry or hatred I may not care that much.But what if it's not something YOU deem "a worthwhile cause"?
But what if it's not something YOU deem "a worthwhile cause"?
I want this to happen simply because of what happened last night. Then I’ll have to search for that former mascot who got bent over … everything … and I’ll laugh and be satisfied.Without getting into the politics of it all, Ivan Provorov is probably a really good buy-low candidate, although I'm not sure the timing and fit work out. Talent wise I bet he'd look damn good in the sightless eye. He's signed for 2 more years after this one at $6.75M. I could envision some sort of deal where Philly gets Skjei and we get Provorov to extend the contract clock by 2 years. The downsides are Ivan is paid a fair chunk more and he hasn't been as good as Skjei lately. Provorov being a Russian would fit in well with Svech and Kochetkov.
I don't think it will happen, but I could envision this possibility, particularly if Philly retains like $1M.
Well, in non-political Around the League news, the Florida/Toronto game was horribly officiated, and it apparently stemmed from a long-standing feud between Paul Maurice and Francios St. Laurent
St. Laurent was the official that was caught laughing/joking when Brian Little broke his vertebrate, which set Maurice off. And eventually led to St. Laurent kicking Maurice out of the game.
Makes me wonder if ol' RBA might have a few unhappy referees looking to make calls against his team.
Without getting into the politics of it all, Ivan Provorov is probably a really good buy-low candidate, although I'm not sure the timing and fit work out. Talent wise I bet he'd look damn good in the sightless eye. He's signed for 2 more years after this one at $6.75M. I could envision some sort of deal where Philly gets Skjei and we get Provorov to extend the contract clock by 2 years. The downsides are Ivan is paid a fair chunk more and he hasn't been as good as Skjei lately. Provorov being a Russian would fit in well with Svech and Kochetkov.
I don't think it will happen, but I could envision this possibility, particularly if Philly retains like $1M.
Pass...I'd rather keep Skjei, he's better and cheaperWithout getting into the politics of it all, Ivan Provorov is probably a really good buy-low candidate, although I'm not sure the timing and fit work out. Talent wise I bet he'd look damn good in the sightless eye. He's signed for 2 more years after this one at $6.75M. I could envision some sort of deal where Philly gets Skjei and we get Provorov to extend the contract clock by 2 years. The downsides are Ivan is paid a fair chunk more and he hasn't been as good as Skjei lately. Provorov being a Russian would fit in well with Svech and Kochetkov.
I don't think it will happen, but I could envision this possibility, particularly if Philly retains like $1M.
We can probably get away with only re-signing one of Pesce/Skjei. We'd hope that one of our D prospects will step into a top 4 role. Consider Morrow, Nikishin, Heimosalmi, and Forsmark. If none of those turn out to be a top 4 D, we don't deserve to be a contender for too long.Dundon and Waddell's definition of long term might be different than what a player thinks is long term, especially to players who will be on the wrong of 30 for most of their extension. It's just like the Braves front office to me, both franchises are not going to pay most of their free agents market value once they get past a certain age. I think two of Skjei, Pesce and Slavin won't be here once their contracts run out. They will either promote from within or sign/trade for a distressed asset.