Canes
Registered User
The actual Atlanta Braves had Chief Noc-A-Homa as a mascot until the mid 80s lolYep, no political correctness in the 70’s.
Powa-Hitta…..
The actual Atlanta Braves had Chief Noc-A-Homa as a mascot until the mid 80s lolYep, no political correctness in the 70’s.
Powa-Hitta…..
What who is talking about?I have no idea what you are talking about.
Maybe. Teams heavily reliant on goaltending are always susceptible to coming up well short of expectations. In addition Kreider's career year likely won't be repeated and that could be the difference between competing for 1st in Metro and competing for a wildcard spot.NYR and Carolina are the cream of the crop for the Metro. I don't think it is close. Shesterkin is #2 next to Vasilevskiy. Their offense is deep. Fox is great.
Maybe. Teams heavily reliant on goaltending are always susceptible to coming up well short of expectations. In addition Kreider's career year likely won't be repeated and that could be the difference between competing for 1st in Metro and competing for a wildcard spot.
They have a lot of players coming off career years. They very well could still be an elite team this year, but I'm skeptical of them until those players have proven they took a collective next step rather than just caught lightning in a bottle.
Well, he did finish the season, unlike Andersen, so that is significantly better, right?This. They just squeaked by us in the playoffs while overperforming while we were very much doing the opposite. If I was to bet it would be on them regressing. I think Shesty is a good goalie but don't think he will finish the season significantly better than other high-end goalies including Andersen.
Well, he did finish the season, unlike Andersen, so that is significantly better, right?
What about Igor, arguably their most important player? His GSAA exploded last year compared to his previous performance. If that settles down to his norm (and, of course his "norm" is still hard to define given his sample size) that could be the difference in quite of few games.Looking at the Rangers top 10 scorers and comparing PPGs vs. prior seasons.
Panarin: Not really career year as he had a better season his first in NY (32G, 95 points in 69 games)
Kreider: Certainly a career year
Zibanejad: PPG player last season but the prior 3 season's were 50p/56GP, 75P/57GP, 74P/82G. So his 81 isn't an anomaly and isn't better than 2 season's ago.
Fox: Career year with .95PPG, but he had .85PPG the season before so I don't think his performance was out of the norm.
Strome: Not a career year, in fact worse than his prior 2 seasons.
Trouba: Not a career year, but his best with NYR.
Goodrow: Career year, but just barely better (PPG) vs. his prior season in TB and the season prior in SJ.
LAF: Career year but disappointing 2nd season for a 1st OA.
Chytl: Not a career year and worse than his prior 2.
Miller: Not a career year as his prior season was better.
Looking at this list, the only one that really stands out as anomalous/career year is Kreider. The rest of the players had years that are either consistent with past performances or they are young and improving.
I think it IS fair to say that other than some of their young guys (Laf, Chytl, Kakko), nobody had a down year which isn't always the case.
Jack LaFontaine was "released" from the Lightning. Poor kid.
What about Igor, arguably their most important player? His GSAA exploded last year compared to his previous performance. If that settles down to his norm (and, of course his "norm" is still hard to define given his sample size) that could be the difference in quite of few games.
according to hockey-referenceEDIT: On a separate note, how was Anderson's GSAA last year vs. his historical performance? Is that data available on natural stat trick? Or where can I find it? Just curious if his performance was within normal bounds or not.
EDIT: On a separate note, how was Anderson's GSAA last year vs. his historical performance? Is that data available on natural stat trick? Or where can I find it? Just curious if his performance was within normal bounds or not.
unfortunately with the lack of public data points, shots and chances created are the only measuring points for defenses. Toronto's defense looks amazing because their system is set up to drive offensive chances. There isnt a public metric that shows when the other team has the puck how good the defense is at creating lower grade chances with stick play, body positioning, etc. It very well could be a change in system, we could be better at the smallest of stick / positioning differences that actuates Freddie's game. maybe i just made all that up. who knowsAs @Gocanes0506 already said, his went up as well. Though whether or not that should be considered a blip or a function of changing teams to one with a different/better defensive posture is unknown. For Igor, there is not the same level of change to point to, although a changing in coaching and strategy may be all it took there.
Yup, I agree with the implication here. I'd be very reluctant to be assured that NYR is going to regress. They've got viable scorers and a group of youngsters that are more likely to improve than take steps back. Personally, I think both Chytl and LAF are likely to have significantly better seasons. Plus, there's something in me that just thinks Trocheck will significantly outperform Strome....based on nothing but a hunch.Looking at the Rangers top 10 scorers and comparing PPGs vs. prior seasons.
Panarin: Not really career year as he had a better season his first in NY (32G, 95 points in 69 games)
Kreider: Certainly a career year
Zibanejad: PPG player last season but the prior 3 season's were 50p/56GP, 75P/57GP, 74P/82G. So his 81 isn't an anomaly and isn't better than 2 season's ago.
Fox: Career year with .95PPG, but he had .85PPG the season before so I don't think his performance was out of the norm.
Strome: Not a career year, in fact worse than his prior 2 seasons.
Trouba: Not a career year, but his best with NYR.
Goodrow: Career year, but just barely better (PPG) vs. his prior season in TB and the season prior in SJ.
LAF: Career year but disappointing 2nd season for a 1st OA.
Chytl: Not a career year and worse than his prior 2.
Miller: Not a career year as his prior season was better.
Looking at this list, the only one that really stands out as anomalous/career year is Kreider. The rest of the players had years that are either consistent with past performances or they are young and improving.
I think it IS fair to say that other than some of their young guys (Laf, Chytl, Kakko), nobody had a down year which isn't always the case.
Its also worth pointing out that over the last few years goalies tend to have inflated stats here vs elsewhere. Our system really does help out goalies in a meaningful way.As @Gocanes0506 already said, his went up as well. Though whether or not that should be considered a blip or a function of changing teams to one with a different/better defensive posture is unknown. For Igor, there is not the same level of change to point to, although a changing in coaching and strategy may be all it took there.
It really is still very strange to read that and not think it's some form of satire.Its also worth pointing out that over the last few years goalies tend to have inflated stats here vs elsewhere. Our system really does help out goalies in a meaningful way.