Around the League - 2023/24

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
People were railing on the Canucks about PDO, unsustainable shooting, unsustainable goaltending, etc. It is hard to say right now anything definitively. You get weird mirages in the numbers in small samples. IE... they've played one of the best teams analytically (Oilers) 3 times so 19% of the games they should have been dominated. Then you have weird quirks like winning 10-1 in a game that was never close, but having a 41% xGF. The biggest thing they do is score first and if they get up by 2 or more, they turtle like mad.

What they have in spades is high end talent. Petey, Miller and Hughes are legit elite players in the league. Demko if healthy is an elite goalie. Petey shooting at 17% isn't unsustainable for him. Miller will regress from 27 and probably fill in around 15-16... but he's likely to also pick up a half shot a game to even that out. Hughes has always been an elite playmaker... now he's added the goal scoring too. His shot is night and day better... so odds are he regresses from 11, but 9 seems reasonable. They also have a great mix of complementary talent that is high end, Hronek, Boeser, Kuzmenko... all great players.

Additionally, we just don't have enough games to see where things fall. If you look at the last two weeks... they are near or in the top 10 in many categories. But if you look at them in October, they look like a fringe bottom 10 team. Are they actually improving and playing better to prop up the hot shooting regression or is this a blip? Like I can go back and say their All Situations xGF% has been over 50% in 9 of their last 12 and 6 of those 9 have been over 55%. That signals a team that should be expected to win a lot of games and probably pushing a ~.650 p%. Not as high as they are... but in the realm of one or two games swaying that. You can also clearly see that they have a heavy reliance on goalies stopping dangerous shots, and many times that does not hold up unless you have a Vezina type goalie in net (which remains to be seen if Demko can do that for a whole year)
 
I just remember the 2009-10 Avs absolutely surged the first half of the season, faltered pretty badly in the second half, but it didn't matter because that start was so strong and they still made the playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colorado Avalanche
I find that canucks team quite likeable. Hope they keep it up and I really like Hughes' game such a smart player.
 
My question with the Canucks ultimately lies with Tocchet. He is the ultimate players' coach. Dude knows how to communicate with and motivate guys like no other, but I feel like when it comes to tactics he falls a bit short. If/when adversity hits, will he be able to make adjustments?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chiarelli
They aren't going to fire him when they are in Sweden, LOL.
They could leave him there...Gerard Gallant style

fu6lQyJ.jpeg


Flo4ktq.jpeg
 
The people pining for Compher still are silly to me. If he's our 2nd line center, we're really no better off. Tried that experiment last year and we know how that turned out. Doesn't look like RyJo is the answer right now, but I'm not gonna sit here and pretend like we missed out on freaking compher, the guy we've been ripping on for half a decade. I think that whole Red Wings team is playing above their station a bit too. They've already started to come back down to earth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad