SmytheKing
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2007
- 987
- 1,429
You're still not understanding the terminology and its implication. It's not saying all white people have it great. It's saying that, all things being equal, a white man will have an easier time than a black man. While there will always be exceptions to that rule, taken as a whole, this is just the truth. I've never been looked at suspiciously when I've been checking out at a supermarket (but I've seen POC watched while everyone else is ignored). I've never been told I can't get an apartment, while POC have been discriminated like this for generations. There are countless examples of these things happening and to deny them is just silly at this point. No one is asking you to feel guilty about these things either. Just be aware and work to (in whichever way you're able) make changes.Putting white in front of privilege is racial by definition. The terminology is a stereotype - I dont see how that can be debated. Advantages (privilege) come in all shapes and size.. intelligence, beauty, wealth, athletic ability, etc. Is it useful to single a skin color vs discuss privilige in general?
This is patently untrue. The Homestead Act literally gave millions of acres of land to white people to migrate West and help settle it. That land has created wealth for generations that Black people did not have access to until several years later when they passed another law that allowed them to also participate. Though it was limited and southern (former) slaveowners did whatever they could to prevent them from doing so. It ended up being repealed a couple of years after passing.Stating some obvious: The USA was established by Europeans and most immigration came from Europe in its 1st 200 years (all mostly white) ... families had many years to establish themselves and gain wealth and places in society (privilege). But it wasnt handed to those that made it - plenty became poor and the underclass. Irish came in droves during potato famine - were discriminated against for many years and were considered lower class for a long time until they worked their way up.
Let's agree to stop comparing slavery thousands of years ago to chattel slavery that the US employed for like 100+ years against Black people. It's unhelpful and the discussion is irrelevant. Same with the Irish Slave talk. It's not nearly the same thing.This 3/5ths is directly tied to slavery and congressional representation in the South (it was a compromise that balanced the power between north and south since the north did not have slaves)..Slavery throughout history did not single out race - every race has been enslaved at one time or another. Most of the slaves in the south were black. If after emancipation they were counted as 3/5ths - that would be a different story. This is not to deny the disgusting level of racism leveled against post emancipated blacks esp in the South.
To the point, he's free to not wear the jersey. Just sad that there are still people who have his beliefs. It's a bummer really.