jfont
Registered User
This is what I thought about when he wasn't qualified
This is what I thought about when he wasn't qualified
Keith’s 5.5 cap hit has been great for the Hawks in the past, but these last few years will be painful. Seabrook’s contract was horrible the day he signed it. They’ll probably have to eat that one soon. Maybe they’re hoping for a compliance buyout with the next CBA.The bigger issue to me is Keith (36 when the season starts) 4 more years and Seabrook (34) with 5 more years.s That's about 12M per for both.
The superstar contracts set the market, though.
The problem with the cap is the floor. It forces teams to spend on marginal players, as they are usually the only players available, because not everyone is going to be either a $10m guy, or an ELC guy. If there was no floor, then you could squeeze the marginal talent more, their salaries would drop, leaving more for the actual talent a team has or wants.
You can also say the problem with the cap is the cap itself. Let owners spend as much or as little as they want. If a franchise can't sustain itself in a given market, wherever that market is, then it needs to either move and go away. Nothing personal, just business.
I knew this is where you were heading. If you want the NHL to contract down to around 24 teams at most, and for most teams to never have a shot at winning a Stanley Cup, this is a great idea.
Let's go back to the days of the two biggest spenders in the Western Conference (back in the day Colorado and Detroit) being the only playoff series worth watching, uh no thanks.
The NHLPA doesn't want that, and neither do the owners.
I have seen the relegation and promotion system suggested by some (mostly European I presume) NHL fans. How does that work? If a team were relegated, does that mean they miss out on a team like Colorado or Tampa coming to town during the relegation period?I would even say 24 teams is very optimistic. The NHL isn't popular like the NFL or the European soccer leagues where billions of dollars rather than millions are distributed. The NHL numbers last year were way bigger than usual recently because of expansion, and there still were teams that struggled. Each team got close to $17M in expansion fees in 17-18, but if you look at operating incomes only 14 of the teams made at least that much in profit. There's a huge gap between team value in the NHL, it's very top heavy.
It's also like this in many of the European soccer leagues, but most of them have a much different system with relegation and promotion where you can pay less for a roster in a lower division while your team tries to rebuild.
I am not an expert on the Leafs, but it looks like Dubas did okay with the Kapanen and Johnsson contracts.
This puts the pressure on Marner's agent. Toronto now only has $7M in cap space. Dubas has moves he can make to free up some cap space to be sure, but he also has a lot of depth up front.
Dubas also has the possibility of picking up four 1st round picks along with $7M in cap space to get a slightly less talented player than Marner, or help his defense.
We can assume Toronto will attempt to trade Zaitsev ($4.5M cap hit), but they have to fill that hole. I guess they could rush one of their young defensemen on an ELC into the lineup, and see how it shakes out. I still think they will be trying to sign Hutton as well.
Definitely an interesting off season already in Toronto.
NOt just that hole on D. Hainsey is gone and Gardiner on his way out. That's experience exiting, you can fill all the holes with kids. They don't have $$ for upgrade at D without moving somebody else out, unless they find a trade partner. Still rumors Nylander might be moved.
I am not an expert on the Leafs, but it looks like Dubas did okay with the Kapanen and Johnsson contracts.
This puts the pressure on Marner's agent. Toronto now only has $7M in cap space. Dubas has moves he can make to free up some cap space to be sure, but he also has a lot of depth up front.
Dubas also has the possibility of picking up four 1st round picks along with $7M in cap space to get a slightly less talented player than Marner, or help his defense.
We can assume Toronto will attempt to trade Zaitsev ($4.5M cap hit), but they have to fill that hole. I guess they could rush one of their young defensemen on an ELC into the lineup, and see how it shakes out. I still think they will be trying to sign Hutton as well.
Definitely an interesting off season already in Toronto.
I tend to agree. At this point Nylander is the odd man out, if they give Marner what he wants. I already assumed Gardiner and Hainsey aren't returning to Toronto.
LeBrun says that the Bolts are very interested in Pavelski. With all the contracts they have to sign, where is that $$ coming from
Also, he said the Leafs called the Bolts about Stralman but the price was too high
Forgot about Dermott being out, thanks. A lot of work to do on the back end for Toronto.They have a couple in house options to promote this season in Borgman (24), Rosen (25) and American Born Teemu Kivihalme (24) who they signed recently from the Finnish League (Karpat). He played college hockey for Colorado College.
I'd assume two of these guys find themselves on the NHL roster come opening night. Remember that Dermott will be out for some time to start the season.