KingsFan7824
Registered User
- Dec 4, 2003
- 19,537
- 7,615
Bad contract for Neal. I don't think we are going to see the kind of production the contract warrants past 2 or 3 more seasons at best.
It's just the price of doing business. Until they lower the max years, you're not signing the still productive 31 year old Neal, without also signing the possibly unproductive 34 year old Neal. This is why the PA has always wanted free agency. The owners will pay stupid money, and there are now more teams that can do so, thanks to the cap and cap floor. Now they're forced to spend a certain amount. Back in 2000, Neal is a Ranger, not s Flame, but it's the same general idea.
Everyone is competitive, and desperate for talent. That's good news for the players.