I agree.
I think they are taking a different approach this time around, and I don’t think it is as good. For example, our drafting has changed. I wrote up this a few days after our draft this year.
GDT: - 2023 NHL Draft
It appears to me that we have changed out drafting strategy from looking for value among European players to looking for value among small North Americans. Personally I would rather look for the next Bjorkstrand or Gavrikov than pick guys like Malatesta and Dumais. I don’t mind taking the occasional flyer on a small guy, but we seem to have stopped looking for Texiers or Marchenkos.
I don't disagree with your post here. However, I will say that the examples you cited were picks after the premium rounds (Bjorkstrand and Gavrikov), whereas Texier and Marchenko were both premium round picks (2nd). We didn't know Brjorkstrand would be a top 6 guys - the hope was he would get there (and did, one of my favorite players). However, he wasn't much bigger than Dumais in his draft year (2" taller but 10 pounds lighter). Different players but both could end up in the same situation, we simply don't know with Dumais yet - for example (and also for the record, I was not a fan of Dumais until seeing his recent play).
I don't think they have given up looking for these. On the contrary, I think they are still there. I tend to like to look at the late round players and while maybe they dont' end up in Columbus, I think they've had some success with pulling talent and to your point of looking for the next Gavrikov or Tex or Marchenko (in general), I see guys like Voronkov and Svozil that were 3rd round or later and appear to be on the track to NHL contributors and maybe more along with the Gavrikov-esque dart throws that look promising like Dolzhenkov, Makarov, Richard and Del Bel Belluz (less dart throw but still unknown for upside).
So, I don't disagree with some of the philosphy change, I think it's the TYPE of player - especially this year - that they have narrowed in on for this building cycle but also think they have some players that I watch that look like they could pay off pretty big - that risk portion much like Gavrikov was.
My future favorites.... McKown and Peddle. Somethign about these two could be bullseyes. I'm not an expert, obviously, but these guys have something that feels more like Texier and Marchenko upside but as later round picks (or free agent).
In short, I get what you are saying I'm just not sure it's as pronounced (to me) as you currently see it. Maybe I'm short sighted on this and just the optimist but I see depth, skill, grit and a fight for roster spots for many years to come to pick the long term core.