WesMcCauley
Registered User
- Apr 24, 2015
- 8,616
- 2,600
what does this even mean... he scored 17 goals, how can he only have 12 primary points.
haha i forgot to write 5v5..... sry
what does this even mean... he scored 17 goals, how can he only have 12 primary points.
what does this even mean... he scored 17 goals, how can he only have 12 primary points.
what does this even mean... he scored 17 goals, how can he only have 12 primary points.
what does this even mean... he scored 17 goals, how can he only have 12 primary points.
I hate when people tweet stuff like this. Sure maybe he wasnt producing a ton at 5v5 but being able to produce on the PP is still important as well. Being near 0.5 ppg is pretty solid regardless of if you are getting the points on PP or 5v5
It means he scored most of them on the PP.
He had 12 ES primary points which likely means Arizona played him above his head last season. That's why fancy stats are kind of **** sometimes.
I hate when people tweet stuff like this. Sure maybe he wasnt producing a ton at 5v5 but being able to produce on the PP is still important as well. Being near 0.5 ppg is pretty solid regardless of if you are getting the points on PP or 5v5
I hate when people tweet stuff like this. Sure maybe he wasnt producing a ton at 5v5 but being able to produce on the PP is still important as well. Being near 0.5 ppg is pretty solid regardless of if you are getting the points on PP or 5v5
Lmao please Benning!
Sedin
Horvat
Sutter
Vermette
Drool
Is it important when those minutes are likely to not be available for him next season?
Calling it right now, Huge offersheet coming up! Kucherov?
Taking the past 3 seasons into account, his relative corsi stats were the best in 2015-2016. They were pretty bad during all of those seasons but it's not like this is a "hard decline".
He had 8 goals and 4 primary assists in 5v5.
Calling it right now, Huge offersheet coming up! Kucherov?