Group Chat Legend*
Guest
The leafs have never been anywhere close to the cap floor.
You mad?
Yet theyve been at the league floor for a while now.
Rather be a cap floor team than a bottom feeder
The leafs have never been anywhere close to the cap floor.
You mad?
The leafs have never been anywhere close to the cap floor.
You mad?
And yet Arizona will be icing a better team now and in the future than the likes of Toronto who blatantly tanked for Matthews.
That's because you chose to pay 16.33M for Lupul, Robidas, Clarkson, Gleason, and the Kessel retention.
If you want to speculate on that then be my guest. You have no way of saying that. But just so we're on the same page.... Losing thirty million dollars a year while barely reaching the Cap floor up until this year and drafting in the top 5 last year is tanking by inferiority
And yet Arizona will be icing a better team now and in the future than the likes of Toronto who blatantly tanked for Matthews.
What did you think of Goligoski trade? Or their top rated prospect group? That a joke to you?
How has AZ violated CBA? And is it worse than what other franchises have done? How does Horton trade look in your world? Or Savard trade(s)? What's happening with Lupul or has Toronto found a way to void his deal just yet? But AZ is everything that's wrong with the CBA, right?
AZ will be above cap floor without Datsyuk or Pronger deals. They were above floor last year as well without Pronger as well. Do a little research.
What exactly are you complaining about?
You're complaining that they resigned a guy who was their top line left winger at the time and is at the end of his career?
Or you're complaining about robidas who they signed for depth?
What are you complaining about? Because truthfully it sounds like you're complaining about the type of transactions that every organization goes through? Kind of like the coyotes regret signing Mike Smith but don't buy him out because he's massively overpaid so they get to reach the cap floor lol
He would be a good fit on the Oilers. We could use a centre who wins draws, also lets us put Drai on the 2nd line with Nuge.
Chia should be all over this.
And yet Arizona will be icing a better team now and in the future than the likes of Toronto who blatantly tanked for Matthews.
Is it okay when the Leafs do it, though? *coughHortoncough*
You just proved again what I said. Coyotes fans are so proud that they get to mess around with the CBA
I don't understand why you're so proud of your prospect group? Its been gained by inferiority and to be honest a GM who forced water through a rock to make good trades that the organization spit on by canning him.
Again, the leafs are not using the Horton deal to poke their head above water like the yotes are but if you need to keep looking at Horton to justify these types of organizational moves, then just go ahead...
Lupul first line winger
Say whatever you want. Buying out a guy with one year left on his contract who came back to a horrible team by choice on a two-year deal is horrible judgment and matches the coyotes organization to a T.
This is a dangerous game lol.He was coming off a PPG season with 25 goals. Whens the last time a coyote player did that?
He was coming off a PPG season with 25 goals. Whens the last time a coyote player did that?
Individual penalty differential isn’t exactly a statistic that’s regularly used, but can certainly help a team determine whether a player is tangibly affecting overall ability to get through a game without playing shorthanded.
Players with positive penalty differentials draw more penalties than they take, and negative differentials are the opposite.
Last season, Vermette finished the year with six individual penalties drawn… but with 25 individual penalties taken.
Per Corsica Hockey, that was good for a minus-19 differential at even strength, worst on the team by a full five penalities (defenseman Connor Murphy was the second worst, with a minus-14). Even controversial Coyotes forwards like Shane Doan and Martin Hanzal, both of whom are no stranger to the penalty box, did a better job of balancing out their transgressions with power play opportunities provided.
For Vermette, there wasn’t exactly a preconceived notion that he was drawing penalties for the team. If anything, there was a sense of frustration surrounding his play because of his time spent in the box – but where some players only seem to spend a disproportionate amount of time in the box, Vermette actually did.
That, combined with his poor possession play, certainly helps explain why the team was willing to shell out money just so he wouldn’t play next year.
^ important to note that the Coyotes had one of the league's worst PK% last season, as well.
Given the money he was on, his poor possession numbers, his awful on-ice discipline, and generally negative impact on other players performances, I can see why the Coyotes wanted to get rid of him. But with one more year, was the buy out worth it?
I hope habs sign him