Confirmed with Link: Arbitration Avoided, Bratt Signs for 1 year, $5.45 million

guitarguyvic

Registered User
Mar 31, 2010
9,085
7,648
A one year deal is still awful however they came about it, it’s nice they avoided the hearing where this was the almost certain outcome anyway but now you’re stuck trying to extend him or trade him with one year left unless the Devils are out of it again this year and they flip him at the deadline
Well…perhaps Jesper wants a certain amount and the team will be more willing to give it to him if he proves he’s worth it this year. If Jesper wants to sign long-term and has a great season and isn’t butthurt about how it played out, then all is good. If he doesn’t have a great season, then the devils avoided a big over-commitment.

But we don’t know what each side truly wanted or offered. I don’t think this one year contract really clarifies it. Maybe we will have a better idea based on what the team does with him at the next go round.
 

Nocashstyle

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2009
8,008
8,540
NJ
It’s bad that he didn’t get locked up long term and there’s still the chance he may have his eyes set on being a UFA in two years.

BUT, it’s good they avoided arbitration. It’s good Bratt is still an RFA next offseason. It’s good Bratt will hopefully have another season to show last year wasn’t a fluke breakout and he is worth 7 or 8 mil long term. Bratt probably also wants to see the Devils trend in the right direction next year before he commits long term.

All in all, more good than bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jersey Fan 12

SKNJD9

Hi, I'm mat.
Aug 28, 2008
35,573
9,420
West of Chicago
:) Not the end of the world like everyone thought, like I said!

Fitz better have an extension ready January 1st, and better push hard for it if Bratt still does well
Lmfao given the last two negotiations what makes you think Bratts agent will do anything but stretch it out to the last possible second
 

PainForShane

formerly surfshop
Dec 24, 2019
2,837
3,277
The Hockey Guy had a video yesterday saying Bratt was looking for 6.5, Devs wanted to pay him 4.15. IIRC he didn't mention term, but if he's correct and Bratt was only looking for 6.5 for a slightly longer bridge deal (or even something long term)...

EDIT: to be clear the 6.5 / 4.15 are the numbers the different camps were looking for in arbitration, they may or may not have to do with discussions on a long term or bridge deal. That said as a neutral fan I do feel 4.15m (even as an arb number) is insultingly low and may lead to signing problems down the road. Sorry @glenwo2 (and everyone else see below) for the confusion, I didn't fully understand THG's video from last night when I made the initial post, thx for calling me out on it

Screen Shot 2022-08-03 at 7.21.43 AM.png
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: glenwo2

BostonDevil

Registered User
Jun 28, 2019
4,769
5,506
I don’t see this as anything but a road to another contentious negotiation in a year.

There’s something going on with either the team or him/his agent and I’m guessing if it hasn’t been cleared up by now, I’m not expecting some magical transformation in the next 12 months.

I hate to say it, but time to move on.
 

Eggtimer

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
15,066
12,132
Calgary Alberta
It’s infinitely better than a 2 or 3 year deal. He’s still an RFA after this. If he puts up another big year, there’s no more “it was a fluke” bullshit. We have money coming off the books and can actually pay him what he deserves. And if he has a down year (he won’t), then we can get him for cheaper.

There just isn’t reason to panic here. Why should Jesper have locked himself into a long term deal before the cap rises and before he’s fully established himself as an elite player?
There could also be Bratt wanting to see how competitive the Devils are this year as well before deciding to commit long term, =6+ years?
I can kinda see that angle but you would think he has some faith in himself and his teammates being able to step it up eventually .
 

TrufleShufle

Registered User
Aug 31, 2012
8,423
13,997
The Hockey Guy had a video yesterday saying Bratt was looking for 6.5, Devs wanted to pay him 4.5. IIRC he didn't mention term, but if he's correct and Bratt was only looking for 6.5 on a slightly longer bridge deal...

I'll see if I can find the source, will edit this post when I do
It was announced that if it went to arbitration that those were the numbers, Bratt at 2 years, team at 1.
 

Mgd31

Registered User
Aug 7, 2007
15,413
10,229
Levittown, NY
If this is true (and it is) then the idea he was gonna sign long term at 6.5m was a pipe dream. If 5.45m is insane value, then he's worth 8m on a long term deal at age 24 imo.
Oh yea he's probably going to put up a PPG season and ask for Laine's contract and set himself up at 28 for another major deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glenwo2

Eggtimer

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
15,066
12,132
Calgary Alberta
What’s the benefit in avoiding arbitration? Still a 1 yr deal
It gets ugly and players can take it personally during arbitration. It’s essentially the Devils trying to say why they think he is worth less money/ less important / good as he thinks he is by asking what he is for salary .
 

glenwo2

JESPER BRATWURST
Oct 18, 2008
52,503
25,002
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
The Hockey Guy had a video yesterday saying Bratt was looking for 6.5, Devs wanted to pay him 4.5. IIRC he didn't mention term, but if he's correct and Bratt was only looking for 6.5 on a slightly longer bridge deal...

I'll see if I can find the source, will edit this post when I do
Dude...I know I am now blaming Fitz but....even THAT number (4.5) is a bit too unbelievable to...well...believe.

But if by some chance, there is truth to it, then Fitz REALLY lowballed Bratt here.....
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,718
38,273
I’ll just say this, if Bratt really wanted to get out of town, I doubt going through the arb process an potentially getting more than 5.4 would’ve bothered him. Maybe that’s a good sign?
 
  • Like
Reactions: glenwo2

OmNomNom

Taco is Love, Taco is Life
Mar 3, 2011
23,213
16,226
In the Church of Salmela
what if bratt wanted to do like $6.5 x 6-7, and Fitz just felt that it was either term or value?

i think them avoiding arbitration is better honestly, and i'm sure we'll see a deal signed by end of 1H
 

glenwo2

JESPER BRATWURST
Oct 18, 2008
52,503
25,002
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
I’ll just say this, if Bratt really wanted to get out of town, I doubt going through the arb process an potentially getting more than 5.4 would’ve bothered him. Maybe that’s a good sign?
His agent is poisoning the Well here.

THAT could be the root cause.

4.1/6.5 was the arb filings from each side. It in no way indicates how high NJ was willing to go on a LTD
right.

This shane guy confused me for a moment there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PainForShane

ninetyeight

Registered User
Jun 3, 2007
2,090
3,121
Finland
The Hockey Guy had a video yesterday saying Bratt was looking for 6.5, Devs wanted to pay him 4.5. IIRC he didn't mention term, but if he's correct and Bratt was only looking for 6.5 on a slightly longer bridge deal...

Those were arbitration numbers for a 1 year deal. This matter has been discussed to death here already. Arbitration offer has close to no relativity to actual long term offers as the team wants to low ball and persuade the player to not go into arbitration and take the long term offer instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PainForShane

ZachaFlockaFlame

Registered User
Aug 24, 2020
15,704
20,701
what if bratt wanted to do like $6.5 x 6-7, and Fitz just felt that it was either term or value?

i think them avoiding arbitration is better honestly, and i'm sure we'll see a deal signed by end of 1H

Fitz is clueless then, Bratt would've outperformed a contract like that quite easily.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glenwo2

devilsfan35

Registered User
Jun 15, 2015
1,860
1,730
So he’s an RFA again next year right? If he went to arbitration and settled on a 1 yr deal he’d become a ufa?
 

Ad

Ad

Ad