Well…perhaps Jesper wants a certain amount and the team will be more willing to give it to him if he proves he’s worth it this year. If Jesper wants to sign long-term and has a great season and isn’t butthurt about how it played out, then all is good. If he doesn’t have a great season, then the devils avoided a big over-commitment.A one year deal is still awful however they came about it, it’s nice they avoided the hearing where this was the almost certain outcome anyway but now you’re stuck trying to extend him or trade him with one year left unless the Devils are out of it again this year and they flip him at the deadline
Lmfao given the last two negotiations what makes you think Bratts agent will do anything but stretch it out to the last possible secondNot the end of the world like everyone thought, like I said!
Fitz better have an extension ready January 1st, and better push hard for it if Bratt still does well
If this is true (and it is) then the idea he was gonna sign long term at 6.5m was a pipe dream. If 5.45m is insane value, then he's worth 8m on a long term deal at age 24 imo.$5.45 million is insane value for Bratt too (lol heh).
There could also be Bratt wanting to see how competitive the Devils are this year as well before deciding to commit long term, =6+ years?It’s infinitely better than a 2 or 3 year deal. He’s still an RFA after this. If he puts up another big year, there’s no more “it was a fluke” bullshit. We have money coming off the books and can actually pay him what he deserves. And if he has a down year (he won’t), then we can get him for cheaper.
There just isn’t reason to panic here. Why should Jesper have locked himself into a long term deal before the cap rises and before he’s fully established himself as an elite player?
It was announced that if it went to arbitration that those were the numbers, Bratt at 2 years, team at 1.The Hockey Guy had a video yesterday saying Bratt was looking for 6.5, Devs wanted to pay him 4.5. IIRC he didn't mention term, but if he's correct and Bratt was only looking for 6.5 on a slightly longer bridge deal...
I'll see if I can find the source, will edit this post when I do
Oh yea he's probably going to put up a PPG season and ask for Laine's contract and set himself up at 28 for another major deal.If this is true (and it is) then the idea he was gonna sign long term at 6.5m was a pipe dream. If 5.45m is insane value, then he's worth 8m on a long term deal at age 24 imo.
It gets ugly and players can take it personally during arbitration. It’s essentially the Devils trying to say why they think he is worth less money/ less important / good as he thinks he is by asking what he is for salary .What’s the benefit in avoiding arbitration? Still a 1 yr deal
Not completely destroying their relationship when Fitzy tells a arbitrator why Bratt isn't worth top dollarWhat’s the benefit in avoiding arbitration? Still a 1 yr deal
Dude...I know I am now blaming Fitz but....even THAT number (4.5) is a bit too unbelievable to...well...believe.The Hockey Guy had a video yesterday saying Bratt was looking for 6.5, Devs wanted to pay him 4.5. IIRC he didn't mention term, but if he's correct and Bratt was only looking for 6.5 on a slightly longer bridge deal...
I'll see if I can find the source, will edit this post when I do
Jesper didn't have to hear the organization layout a case for why he wasn't worth what he was asking.What’s the benefit in avoiding arbitration? Still a 1 yr deal
4.1/6.5 was the arb filings from each side. It in no way indicates how high NJ was willing to go on a LTDDude...I know I am now blaming Fitz but....even THAT number (4.5) is a bit too unbelievable to...well...believe.
But if by some chance, there is truth to it, then Fitz REALLY lowballed Bratt here.....
His agent is poisoning the Well here.I’ll just say this, if Bratt really wanted to get out of town, I doubt going through the arb process an potentially getting more than 5.4 would’ve bothered him. Maybe that’s a good sign?
right.4.1/6.5 was the arb filings from each side. It in no way indicates how high NJ was willing to go on a LTD
The Hockey Guy had a video yesterday saying Bratt was looking for 6.5, Devs wanted to pay him 4.5. IIRC he didn't mention term, but if he's correct and Bratt was only looking for 6.5 on a slightly longer bridge deal...
what if bratt wanted to do like $6.5 x 6-7, and Fitz just felt that it was either term or value?
i think them avoiding arbitration is better honestly, and i'm sure we'll see a deal signed by end of 1H