Confirmed with Link: Arbitration Avoided, Bratt Signs for 1 year, $5.45 million

severian

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
4,104
2,257
Westfield
I don’t see this as anything but a road to another contentious negotiation in a year.

There’s something going on with either the team or him/his agent and I’m guessing if it hasn’t been cleared up by now, I’m not expecting some magical transformation in the next 12 months.

I hate to say it, but time to move on.
It's certainly better than actually having gone through with the arbitration hearing. Now at least the Devils will be in a much different position cap-wise to offer an extension and they will also have another chance to see if last year was a fluke or if Bratt is legitimately a top-line winger.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
67,701
30,525
I’ll just say this, if Bratt really wanted to get out of town, I doubt going through the arb process an potentially getting more than 5.4 would’ve bothered him. Maybe that’s a good sign?
Nah... nothing changes after this year... I mean the idea that we are waiting for cap space to open is nonsense. You can structure any deal to make it work for both the player and the org right now.

Only thing that changes next summer is Jesper is just a little closer to UFA
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,002
14,918
It's good that they avoided arbitration but now they have to come back and do this again next year.

They've now blown 3 RFA years with Bratt where the savings they're getting just hasn't mattered much. Hopefully he has a big season this year and they get to sign him to a good long-term deal.

Nah... nothing changes after this year... I mean the idea that we are waiting for cap space to open is nonsense. You can structure any deal to make it work for both the player and the org right now.

Only thing that changes next summer is Jesper is just a little closer to UFA

This is flat out wrong, the Devils don't have cap room right now, they could not do 8x8 right now without e.g. hoping that Johnsson gets claimed on waivers.
 

SpeakingOfTheDevils

Devils Advocate
Jan 22, 2010
15,660
7,940
Philadelphia, PA
This isn't a bad outcome, given Bratt's RFA status next summer.

For the sake of all parties, I hope Bratt kills it this year, and Fitz gives him his bag. And they all lived happily ever after.

If Bratt has a down year? We will be pulling teeth - and maybe some fingernails - next summer.
 

MakoSlade

Registered User
Nov 17, 2005
847
432
New York City
Seems a very team friendly deal, but in the current environment could work out for Bratt. No team has cap space now, not even the Devils who have managed the cap among the best in the league. Cap should go up next year, Devils have most of the key players signed long term, and Tartar and Johnsson come off the books. If Brat has another dominant season, he will cash in big time.
 

Jersey Fresh

Video Et Taceo
Feb 23, 2004
26,878
9,879
T.A.
Nah... nothing changes after this year... I mean the idea that we are waiting for cap space to open is nonsense. You can structure any deal to make it work for both the player and the org right now.

Only thing that changes next summer is Jesper is just a little closer to UFA
Or he has a bigger year and Fitz offers him more.
 

severian

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
4,104
2,257
Westfield
This isn't a bad outcome, given Bratt's RFA status next summer.

For the sake of all parties, I hope Bratt kills it this year, and Fitz gives him his bag. And they all lived happily ever after.

If Bratt has a down year? We will be pulling teeth - and maybe some fingernails - next summer.
Agreed. But if Bratt has a down year then maybe we shouldn't be screaming for Fitz to back up the Brinks truck for him?
 

TrufleShufle

Registered User
Aug 31, 2012
8,423
13,997
Nah... nothing changes after this year... I mean the idea that we are waiting for cap space to open is nonsense. You can structure any deal to make it work for both the player and the org right now.

Only thing that changes next summer is Jesper is just a little closer to UFA
A lot changes next year no matter what. We either find out this year was a fluke for Bratt, or it wasn't. One side 100% will be able to slap there hand on the table next year and say "see? this is why I wanted the contract to be this much."
 

HBK27

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2005
14,178
15,327
Northern NJ
This is flat out wrong, the Devils don't have cap room right now, they could not do 8x8 right now without e.g. hoping that Johnsson gets claimed on waivers.

Yes they could've as it's almost certain that Bernier's $4.125M cap hit winds up on LTIR at least to start the season.
 

glenwo2

JESPER BRATWURST
Oct 18, 2008
52,503
25,002
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
No. He still would've been an RFA but the Devils wouldn't have been able to negotiate an extension under 1/1/23.
Exactly.

This deal gives Fitz and Bratt/JOKE'im the opportunity to try and hammer out a deal in the meantime with no restrictions like that 1/1/23 date.

We'll see what happens in the coming days...weeks....months....

yeah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maine Fan

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,583
22,960
St Petersburg
Exactly.

This deal gives Fitz and Bratt/JOKE'im the opportunity to try and hammer out a deal in the meantime with no restrictions like that 1/1/23 date.

We'll see what happens in the coming days...weeks....months....

yeah.
Congrats its done. Its not the worse case scenario. I know that was hard for you. Hope our guy will change his agent.
 

severian

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
4,104
2,257
Westfield
Exactly.

This deal gives Fitz and Bratt/JOKE'im the opportunity to try and hammer out a deal in the meantime with no restrictions like that 1/1/23 date.

We'll see what happens in the coming days...weeks....months....

yeah.
The reality is that there is a very small chance that they are hammering out a deal before the new year. But at least that artificial barrier is gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HBK27 and glenwo2

Emperoreddy

Show Me What You Got!
Apr 13, 2010
133,583
80,926
New Jersey, Exit 16E
We don't know the specifics still but the obvious guess is Bratt's team wanted a high number to sign with term and Fitz wasn't meeting it. Whatever that number was.

Bratt has a repeat season then any doubts Fitz had in paying him should be gone and they will have more cap space to easily come close or hit the number his side wants.
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
14,002
14,918
Yes they could've as it's almost certain that Bernier's $4.125M cap hit winds up on LTIR at least to start the season.

It's not almost certain that it does. If they throw Johnsson on waivers and he gets claimed, LTIR is avoided. In the scenario of 8x8, you're looking at $84.6M with Wood, at 13/7/2 with one of the 7 being Okhotiuk or Bahl, so you're short a roster spot and have Bernier on LTIR, and there's not a lot of room left. It's not where the Devils want to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
34,928
35,480
NJ
The positive I can take away from this is he was already deserving of 8 and I don’t see any realistic year upping that price by much if a long term deal were to end up getting done. This does absolutely nothing to ease my anxiety over how we’re just going to go through this same song and dance in a year
 

ninetyeight

Registered User
Jun 3, 2007
2,090
3,121
Finland
You can structure any deal to make it work for both the player and the org right now.

That's not how it works, contract structures only affect the payment side, the aav stays the same no matter what the structure. If Bratt had signed a 7+m deal, one or more contracts would have needed to be unloaded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

Ad

Ad

Ad