The biggest problem is how guys like this are moved for similar assets, and rarely for picks, but picks are a better way to gauge value without getting bogged down in how different kids are rated.
I'd want a stalled forward around 21 or 22, who isn't reaching his potential... yet. An equivalent to Phillip Danault when the Habs got him for scraps.
Some have difficulty reading an entire sentence, never mind using picks as a metric.
As for a trade...someone like Laffy if he stayed at the 30 point range. Laffy value to me was mid 1st and down to bottom 1st or high 2nd if he stayed at the 30 point range.
X value is a low/mid 2nd. Maybe not a straight up swap but closer to asset for asset plus a sweetener. At this point though, it looks like Laffy is stepping up in production and of course value.
Also depends how much need a team has for X type player which would tilt the scales.
(Bet that someone wont read the entire sentence and start with "but he's a first rounder, the other guy is undrafted, how dare you".)