King Makar19
Registered User
- Dec 5, 2019
- 1,643
- 823
Agree .Would be lucky to get a 2nd for him. For what he brings we are better off kipping him for now.He's still not worth a 1st. He's a bottom pairing guy at best
Yep, said young, big and fights.Well he's U23 still.
You'd think a team interested in him wouldn't see him as a finished project.
Looking at him play, he has room to grow with decent skating, shot and offensive flair.
The thing he needs to work on are gap control, simplifying his game and overall positioning... mostly adjusting to the NHL.
That's actually a more useful reply than "some midround pick"He isn't good enough to return a useful return
In the playoffs, fights go way down, a smart reliable defensive D like Struble will be more useful at that point, unless Xhekaj improves his reads and doesn't get out of position for hits anymore.Keep Arber. Brings a unique game that will be valued way more after a playoff run.
No. It was not edited.Not sure if edited but last night of OP is: « We need better forwards more then more defenseman so what would be your offer one for one in a young forward? »
This Philly fan would not trade young former firsts Brink, Foerster or Farabee for him with Deslauriers and Hathaway on board.
The Habs are filled with young D, and some will need to be moved vefore reaching their full potential.a classic case of a player being worth far more to the habs than another team - unless they get a dumb return like Nashville received for Jeannot.
This is not a player to trade. He's not a thrown in and he has exceptional value to a team like montreal, which needs his size and toughness.
He's 22 on an entry level deal, has some offensive upside and is a top 10 fighter in the NHL
Those who want to trade him, will then turn around in another thread and complain over and over again that the habs are too small and soft and easy to play against.
and they drafted his brother. no reason to move him unless it's for a clear upgrade. great guy to have around.He is a fan favorite,a good 4-5 defenseman and one of the best fighter in the league. Unless you agree to overpay for him,forget It…
yup you guys are going to be like us a few yrs ago, having to let good players go because your too deep, eg Marchment, Grundstrom, Durzi etcThe Habs are filled with young D, and some will need to be moved vefore reaching their full potential.
Guhle is a lock, and Matheson seems to be around for a while until kids displace him.
Harris, Struble, Xhekaj, soon to be signed Hutson, are all fighting for the same slot.
it was a habs fan who created a value of thread for xhekaj.Explain to me why Montreal would consider accepting that? He's a bona-fide NHL player who brings a skillset that's incredibly rare in today's NHL. He's young, cheap, abd improving. They dont need cap space. The only reason they would move him is to upgrade an area of weakness. A 3rd round pick isn't likely to even make it to the show. Let alone be impactful. That's like the old Simpson episode where Homer trades in a boat for a mystery box because box could have anything in it, even a boat. It's nonsensical
Superstar young forward? I only saw 1 player listed going the other way. On what planet is Arber worth a super start potential young forward? You can say the offer clearly needs to make Montreal better or it's not worth making the trade, but superstar potential seems a bit wishful thinking.What a ridiculous thread, just say what you want for him. If it's nothing short of a "superstar potential young forward" that's just bonkers.
I think guys like Harris, Kovacevic, Savard...will be moved instead of Arber. As described in this thread, his value is way higher to the habs- then to move him for a middling pick. Hughes has 20+ picks in the next two drafts.The Habs are filled with young D, and some will need to be moved vefore reaching their full potential.
Guhle is a lock, and Matheson seems to be around for a while until kids displace him.
Harris, Struble, Xhekaj, soon to be signed Hutson, are all fighting for the same slot.
I value X on what i would be willing to pay, which is easily a 2nd or a very late 1st if i thought i could play him with a vet like we had in Markov.
Markov made Komisarek look good and X is far better then him.
Draft choices are crap shoot in the 2nd round, never mind 3rd round. No team would trade a young player already in the NHL playing top 6 with and more growth for the value some think in here.
X isn't going anywhere but he also has a small window to step up to the next level simply because we created a trap for ourselves with too many young defenseman.
I think the hope was to have someone offer a forward with top 6 potential equivalent to Xhekaj's top 4 potential.Superstar young forward? I only saw 1 player listed going the other way. On what planet is Arber worth a super start potential young forward? You can say the offer clearly needs to make Montreal better or it's not worth making the trade, but superstar potential seems a bit wishful thinking.
2 of the 3 you mentionned don't play the left side. Even Harris is likely to stick around only if he can play the right side regularly.I think guys like Harris, Kovacevic, Savard...will be moved instead of Arber. As described in this thread, his value is way higher to the habs- then to move him for a middling pick. Hughes has 20+ picks in the next two drafts.
They didn't draft Florian to trade Arber. He's a perfect bottom pair guy (with maybe no.4 upside) with a very unique skill set. 0 reason to move him