bsl
Registered User
- Oct 9, 2009
- 10,320
- 3,597
Nope. Not to you. Maybe I end up putting the guy on ignore too. But I only do that with bullying.I don't think that this is directed at me, is it? I have a bunch of posters on ignore...
Nope. Not to you. Maybe I end up putting the guy on ignore too. But I only do that with bullying.I don't think that this is directed at me, is it? I have a bunch of posters on ignore...
What if he gets traded before then?
Danaults are a dime a dozen. Domis are not.I like Danault more than Domi because Danault wins faceoffs and can shutdown other teams top centres.
Yikes. You are triggering me man. But you are entitled to your opinion.Danault is also more valuable than Anderson 1 for 1.
Who's centering line 1? let me guess....Anderson is playing with drouin and suzuki and it’s gonna be a really good 2nd line
How though? He played on the 4th line in the playoffs and was largely ineffective when asked to move up the lineup. His play showed he had no place on the top two lines and by extension, Montreal. He could have tried to sugar coat it, but no one was going to buy it.Oh don't get me wrong... I hated Domi's play last season and totally ok with Habs getting rid off him. Still think that Bergevin could have done a better job of not showing the entire world that Domi has no place in Mtl and then try to trade him.
Anderson is playing with drouin and suzuki and it’s gonna be a really good 2nd line
You can't have 3 second line in the nhl. Salary cap says hi. Even more than we are loaded up in the backHey, I have no problem with a Danault - Gally - Tatar line playing the other team top line: they are among the best at that. And that frees two offensive lines to play the opponent 2nd and 3rd. A winning proposition if you ask me.
I liked Domi, a real stinging bee, but we needed the freight train we got: just think what Suzuki could do with that new shiny toy.
You can't have 3 second line in the nhl. Salary cap says hi. Even more than we are loaded up in the back
That's a much better forward group then we iced in terms of balance if we could add another scorer and bump Lehkonen down to the 4th line that'd be great.I like Gallagher Anderson Armia as RW on top 3 lines.
Tatar Danault Gallagher
Drouin Suzuki Armia
Lehkonen Kotkaniemi Anderson
Byron Evans Simmons
Poehling
Ideally it's Taylor Hall:That's a much better forward group then we iced in terms of balance if we could add another scorer and bump Lehkonen down to the 4th line that'd be great.
Hey, I have no problem with a Danault - Gally - Tatar line playing the other team top line: they are among the best at that. And that frees two offensive lines to play the opponent 2nd and 3rd. A winning proposition if you ask me.
I liked Domi, a real stinging bee, but we needed the freight train we got: just think what Suzuki could do with that new shiny toy.
That's a much better forward group then we iced in terms of balance if we could add another scorer and bump Lehkonen down to the 4th line that'd be great.
How far the team goes definitely depends on how much KK/Suzuki grow. The Habs success seem very dependent on their growth (which is a nice narrative change from being fully on Price).The team will be better balanced both offensively and defensively. Will it be enough to make the playoffs providing only 16 teams are making team i don't know? But it's surely lacking skills in a significant way to win a cup unless both Suzuki and JK take the next step.
And then we lose 3 players in the top 9 in the next season and 1 d-man due to expansion.We can this year!
Ideally it's Taylor Hall:
Hall-KK-Gallagher
Drouin-Suzuki-Anderson
Tatar-Danault-Armia
Byron-Evans-Lehkonen
Stay the f*** away from Simmonds, the guy is done. Also I'm fully aware that Hall likely isn't coming here. We need a legit star winger though.
We traded Domi to get a different mix of forwards. Granlund would be more of the same. An undersized playmaker. Dadonov would be nice, but I don't know who would play LW because Gallagher-Anderson-Armia will be our top 9 RW and it would be a waste if any of them were on the 4th line. Hoffman would be nice, but he seems like a headcase.I think if we used late picks to move Byron and Weal out we could fit Hall or Dadonov or Granlund under the cap.
We traded Domi to get a different mix of forwards. Granlund would be more of the same. An undersized playmaker. Dadonov would be nice, but I don't know who would play LW because Gallagher-Anderson-Armia will be our top 9 RW and it would be a waste if any of them were on the 4th line. Hoffman would be nice, but he seems like a headcase.
How far the team goes definitely depends on how much KK/Suzuki grow. The Habs success seem very dependent on their growth (which is a nice narrative change from being fully on Price).