IF Anderson doesn't bounce back, and that is very likely, you will be embarrassed by your post in a year.
Besides, I'll never be embarrassed by this post because EVERYONE knows Domi was worth significantly more than Anderson (I mean, go look at my poll: Anderson vs 3rd round pick - it's very close lol). So regardless of what Anderson does next year, the point stands: Bergevin could have had MORE. He was in a position of strength and somehow made it his weakness. This is somewhat like Subban vs Weber, except Anderson is coming off a shitty year, while Weber wasn't. And sure, while Weber became better, the point stands that Bergevin could have had more for Subban as well.
Confirmation bias, stubbornness, whatever. Your credibility is not helped by clinging to the weak idea that Canadiens adulatory fans knew more about Shea Weber and PK Subban than 29 other GMs did. The trade was almost universally praised within NHL circles, while fans armed with little more than enthusiasm repeatedly cited so-called advanced stats and other theories to prove that they knew more than hockey people.
All this being said, I don't like the trade. The reason I don't like it is that it is based on a almost surely false premise, that Domi is our fourth best center.
I don't think it's close. I think he could well outscore each of the three guys we kept by 15-20 points or more. The other way around, that he scores 15-20 points less is virtually inconceivable. So within the range of normal, Bergevin took an enormous risk. And it's a triple risk. Not only might Domi himself make us regret the trade, Anderson might too. If he settles in as a 18-22 goals scorer on this team, which is easily possible, then we didn't get enough for Domi whatsoever. Finally, there is the third round pick that has a 5-10% chance of turning into a decent player too.
There are just so many ways this could go wrong. Even if Anderson is a potential 27 goals scorer, if Kotkaniemi doesn't learn how to ring up an assist, or Danault falls off without 19 minutes, or Suzuki peaks as a 55 point player, the team will not be further ahead, and it used one of its best trade assets already.
I evaluate trades on a risk-reward basis. There is way too much risk, and not that much high reward to lead me to support it.
As a fan, I will hope I'm wrong, that's all I can say.