Go on the main poll boardEasy there. buddy, a lot of us hate this trade.

Domi landslide victory vs Anderson, and so far it’s 50/50 between Anderson vs the 3rd rounder. Talk about a super fleece by Columbus.
Go on the main poll boardEasy there. buddy, a lot of us hate this trade.
To quote Mark Twain. History may not repeat but it sure rhymesThis trade reminds me of the Cammalleri vs Bourque trade.
Bourque was never expected to play up to Cammalleri’s level, however, part of the reason that the Habs traded for him was due to his size. Bourque didn’t have the scoring touch that Cammalleri had but his frame was what the Canadiens wanted.
Hopefully history doesn’t repeat itself...
He never has outplayed Domi. What makes you think he'll start now?Cant wait for most of you to eat crow when Anderson outperforms Domi. That is all.
I liked the Weber trade from the start, though subby should have got a Center. That would have been even better. and It is not hindsight. I knew then it was a good trade. And I like this trade. Big big upside. Judging by how many people here were laughably wrong on the Subban trade, which I knew at the time, I have a hard time taking half these comments seriously. (I said little on the subby trade, as the bullying to anyone here who supported it was unreal.) My only problem is Danno should have gone, not Domi. Flame away.
So our biggest need was a top 6 forward that can help us score and we trade away our top point producer from a year ago for a player that produces significantly less?
What's the plan here? We didn't get knocked out of the playoffs due to our lack of defense or goaltending, it was because the team can't score to save their life.
Now we removed one of our best offensive forwards for a guy who very well may be 9th best forward on a team with an already weak top 9 (Especially if we get the Anderson we saw this season).
![]()
I like the player but I hate the trade. Even if Anderson has a good year and scores 25 goals at the end of the day, is it more than what Domi would bring in a good year?
Why are we dismissing Domi so quickly? He was our best offensive player last f***ing year. Domi having a good year would bring more than Anderson in a good year. He is younger than Anderson and has already have a better year than Anderson will likely ever have.
Anderson fills a huge hole but honestly we just created a new hole that Suzuki/KK may not necessarily be able to fill over the course of the whole season. Especially a possibly shortened season with a condensed schedule. I like that we are giving them a real shot but we need to surround them well. When I envisioned adding Anderson it was not while subtracting Domi.
Since when does BargainBin have a plan? His blind affection for third liners is clouding his train of thought.So our biggest need was a top 6 forward that can help us score and we trade away our top point producer from a year ago for a player that produces significantly less?
What's the plan here? We didn't get knocked out of the playoffs due to our lack of defense or goaltending, it was because the team can't score to save their life.
Now we removed one of our best offensive forwards for a guy who very well may be 9th best forward on a team with an already weak top 9 (Especially if we get the Anderson we saw this season).
![]()
How is an injury prone player that never reached 50 points in six years amazing? When is the last time this team had a 40 goal scorer?Dominwas crap on the wing and didn't try.
The way to rectify the situation was to play Domi at center for half a season with good wingers, get his trade value up, then maybe we're able to trade him and a 3rd for Laine.
Not good to trade a player when his value is low.
But this board was with management and strongly didn't want to do that. So this is the best of a bad situation.
P.S. I hope I eat my words, Anderson is amazing, and Domi is in fact a 54 point center who's a defensive liability.
Sounds like Danault too. At least Domi can contribute offensively. Still like the trade though.Maybe, you preferred that the organization be compromised by a pouting player wanting to be first or second line centre.
I don't get this. It's like people have no idea what Habs need. Anderson has very high shot totals and has shown he can score goals. IF he stays healthy, he is a positive addition on an offence that needs goal scorers, not playmakers.That's a poorly framed "either/or" argument.
I've got no issue moving Domi. The issue, as is often the case with MB, is asset management. We traded away the more proven, reliable & skilled asset AND paid a premium, while taking on the significantly greater risk.
Poor asset management. Hopefully we get lucky & Anderson stays healthy (& doesn't hold out like he did last contract) and delivers career best numbers moving forward... That's what he'll have to do just to match Domi's career worst productivity.
For a team that needs to upgrade its ability to score, not exactly a positive scenario.
I'm talking about the future not the past...How is an injury prone player that never reached 50 points in six years amazing? When is the last time this team had a 40 goal scorer?
IF Anderson stays healthy, and that is a big if true, you will be embarrassed by this post in a year.With all due respect, I’m glad to see everyone here’s on cloud nine for having been completely f***ed over by Columbus on this trade and being the laughing stock of the league. Domi should have received way more, being a 50+ pt Center capable of hitting 70+ at a young age. You know it’s bad when Viqsi (aka the biggest Anderson fangirl in the world) is jumping up and down in excitement also laughing at our expense.
This WILL go down as Bergevin’s absolute worst trade, and that is saying A LOT. And ain’t nobody going to tell me in some months from now “wtf Bergy sucks” while every single one of you seems to be making an excuse for his absolute trash trade now.
Abderso
I don't get this. It's like people have no idea what Habs need. Anderson has very high shot totals and has shown he can score goals. IF he stays healthy, he is a positive addition on an offence that needs goal scorers, not playmakers.
I'm talking about the future not the past...
Abderso
I don't get this. It's like people have no idea what Habs need. Anderson has very high shot totals and has shown he can score goals. IF he stays healthy, he is a positive addition on an offence that needs goal scorers, not playmakers.
IF Anderson doesn't bounce back, and that is very likely, you will be embarrassed by your post in a year.IF Anderson stays healthy, and that is a big if true, you will be embarrassed by this post in a year.
It's not at all like that trade. When healthy, Anderson shoots a lot and scores a lot. And he is not in a brain fog like Bourque. The only criticism of this trade I have is the health question, and yes that is a big risk. But the upside is huge.This trade reminds me of the Cammalleri vs Bourque trade.
Bourque was never expected to play up to Cammalleri’s level, however, part of the reason that the Habs traded for him was due to his size. Bourque didn’t have the scoring touch that Cammalleri had but his frame was what the Canadiens wanted.
Hopefully history doesn’t repeat itself...
Man he is older than Domi lol