I've always wondered why all the posters that defend EVERY leaf player and EVERYTHING management does... but they are critical only about Andersen's play. He's the one player. I never understood it. These posters hate knee jerk reactions against any other leaf. They dig deep to weird obscure stats to defend every single solitary other leaf player. But not Andersen.
Why?
It dawned on me recently.... he's one of the only players on the team that has nothing to do with Dubas. Dubas wasn't gm when the leafs traded for him. Dubas didn't draft him. Didn't sign him to his current contract. That means that Andersen can be a scapegoat to protect everything Dubas.
I swear... if Dubas was gm and traded for Andersen, the narrative here about him would be soooo different. The obscure stats to defend him would make your head spin. "Yeah, the dumb dumb stats say Andersen sucks.... but when you look at advanced 'smart' stats like save % against none curved stick shooters of the height 5'9 to 5'11 when penalty killing down 2 men in the 2nd overtime period on full moon nights, you'll see Andersen is actually one of the best in the league".
I don't know that it's that, but the thing is, these issues aren't just things that started yesterday.
Look at his playoff record; I'm willing to concede the Leafs weren't beating Washington or Boston I, but Boston II was winnable with above average goaltending, and in August during CBJ he was outdueled by not one, but two goalies, a rookie included.
He's a slow starter, the October #'s have been posted I'm sure, and in a shortened season playing against the same six teams we can't afford to come out 3-7-2 or something, there is way less runway.
Personally I think he's a fine goalkeeper, at the very least an above average one, but there are some issues, like weak or untimely goals.
To be a goalie in this market you have to be made of certain stuff; Felix had it, Eddie had it, Cujo had it, Reimer had...some of it I think - Toskala and Raycroft didn't have it.
Freddy may have at one time had it, but he just got worn down by it all, it happens.
If Campbell plays 20-28 games, winning record and posts above 0.915 and less than 2.75 I'm fully prepared to walk.
If not I'm willing to roll the dice in FA, and Freddy would absolutely re-sign if the Leafs offered him term, but is that what we want?