thewave
Toronto Maple Leafs Toy Co.
- Jun 17, 2011
- 43,657
- 14,162
If Dubas gave 1/10th of the performance in the office as what Kadri is doing for the AVs right now, we would, we would probably still have Kadri. Nevermind.
Again, he's a more viable NHL asset than Marchment, which is all that matters here. He has way more NHL games at a younger age.
Because we were relatively healthy at that point and didn't need him. Marchment wouldn't have come any closer to doing anything, so who cares? He wasn't brought in to be the answer in the playoffs. He was an improvement on the thing we gave up. That's it. Every transaction is not going to be the ultimate solution. GMs are allowed to make minor deals.
Right but you knew he was going to. A lot of that was talent around him. MitchMarner and willienylander ain’t never going to try like he does. I don’t it’s in their DNA.To be fair, Mackinnon didn't fully put things together until his 5th NHL season.
Because you say so? You also said Petan could be a reclamation project yet he clearly doesn’t think the game at an NHL level so that was never happening.The guy is 28 years old, has barely 100 NHL games under his belt, 2/3rds of them are with the Leafs and has shown zero ability to be a consistent above average PKer in this league (despite being a "specialist" in it) . Seems like a definition of "medicore" as far as an NHL career.
The Bruins needed a cheap depth player and he was lucky to get that opportunity. They're not going to wear down all of their stars on the PK, hence they give some spots to the depth guys like Par.
Right but you knew he was going to. A lot of that was talent around him. MitchMarner and willienylander ain’t never going to try like he does. I don’t it’s in their DNA.
Because you say so? You also said Petan could be a reclamation project yet he clearly doesn’t think the game at an NHL level so that was never happening.
Lucky? No, you don’t luck into an NHL contract with a Stanley Cup contender, you earn it. Nobody finds themselves in an NHL playoff game on a count of luck. That line of thinking is so incredibly out of touch with reality.
Rather than acknowledge it was a small but stupid move you’d prefer to defend, deflect and discredit.
Actually to be fair to Nylander and Marner, Mackinnon wasn't going anywhere and the Avalanche were in pure disarray as late as 2017, and had only had one great rookie year in Colorado. Marner and Nylander have been part of a much more successful program for the first few years of their careers. That isn't to say I think Marner or Nylander have a hidden Mackinnon gear though.
World Cup or whatever the hell they named it was really his coming out party. A lot of people felt his head/hands didn't match his feet up to that point. He had an okay year after it then broke outPeople were fairly critical of him as I can remember. There were defiantly a handful of (very stupid) mainbaords threads debating if he was a disappointment for a #1 or even bust lol
Because you say so? You also said Petan could be a reclamation project yet he clearly doesn’t think the game at an NHL level so that was never happening.
Lucky? No, you don’t luck into an NHL contract with a Stanley Cup contender, you earn it. Nobody finds themselves in an NHL playoff game on a count of luck. That line of thinking is so incredibly out of touch with reality.
Rather than acknowledge it was a small but stupid move you’d prefer to defend, deflect and discredit.
That Kadri for Kermit and Barrie deal alone should be a fireable offence for Dubas.
So... you're trying to use these trades as a mark against Dubas because your issue is something else entirely that's already been addressed...?These Lindholm/Marchment and Petan/Malgin deals aren't impactful but the concern is the Leafs have many weaknesses even in depth positions that don't seem to be addressed. Like adequate goaltending depth for the year and a half before Campbell
Because Muzzin got injured... The hate for Marincin is weird. What do people expect out of a #7-8 defenseman?or why they had to resort to Martin Marincin for the nth time.
You’re underselling him, but that’s fine. Let’s pretend you’re right - Do you think an average NHL PK’er and depth option is more valuable than an AHL player for a team hoping to make an NHL playoff run?Because he's never shown on any nhl team he's played for to be a consistent above average PKer....
He was lucky in the sense the Bruins didn't have anyone better on their depth chart to slot into the lineup Head of him in that spot because hes an easily replaceable player
In your opinion, you mean.You're just ignoring the facts. He was pedestrian in his role in Toronto. He was outplayed by Moore and lost his roster spot. He really showed no reason for the Leafs to hang onto him, and as a 13th forward he's quite replaceable.
I'm lost who is the AHL winger? Minor Leaguer?In your opinion, you mean.
The point is they lost Kadri to suspension and could have really used a depth centreman but didn’t have one because Dubas traded him for a minor leaguer. While he certainly isn’t a 3rd liner, he can keep up with better players far more effectively than Freddy Gauthier.
The Leafs centre depth was terrible. Trading a depth centreman for an AHL winger makes absolutely no sense to anyone unless you’re just blindly trying to defend the decisions of Kyle Dubas.
Par Lindholm doesn't change anything about that. The gap in our center depth was not players who are bad at literally everything.The Leafs centre depth was terrible.
Nic Petan. There's literally been 4 pages debating the merits of trading Par LindholmI'm lost who is the AHL winger? Minor Leaguer?
Nic Petan.I'm lost who is the AHL winger? Minor Leaguer?
He was a pending free agent we could have signed a few months later.Nic Petan.
It was a minor deal but speaks more to the thought process of the GM. If I trade you a toonie for a loonie it’s not really a big deal, but you’d walk away wondering if I understand how money works.
I walk away wondering if Dubas can differentiate AHL players from NHL players. This deal and the Garret Sparks/Curtis McIlhinney debacle are two egregious examples in two years.
People were fairly critical of him as I can remember. There were defiantly a handful of (very stupid) mainbaords threads debating if he was a disappointment for a #1 or even bust lol
Yes, but you can’t sign him in the playoffs in the event of injury or suspension. Most GM’s understand you’re going to use more than 12 forwards if you go anywhere in the playoffs. Petan is 25-26 year old AHL player... is that really an asset?He was a pending free agent we could have signed a few months later.
This wasn't about thinking Petan was simply better, it's about asset management. Losing a player who isn't on your playoff projected roster? Isn't even your 13th forward? Move him for a longer term option. If you need him back, you could sign him or a similar player
So... you're trying to use these trades as a mark against Dubas because your issue is something else entirely that's already been addressed...?
Also, it wasn't a year and a half. Sparks through the beginning of February was 7-3-1, with a 0.909 SV%. He dropped off in the last month and a half, but Hutchinson was serviceable in 2018-2019 as well; putting up a 0.914 SV% with us. I can understand people wanting something done in that offseason, but that's half of a year, and there weren't many possible options within our price range.
Because Muzzin got injured... The hate for Marincin is weird. What do people expect out of a #7-8 defenseman?
Oh ok. Thanks.Nic Petan.
It was a minor deal but speaks more to the thought process of the GM. If I trade you a toonie for a loonie it’s not really a big deal, but you’d walk away wondering if I understand how money works.
I walk away wondering if Dubas can differentiate AHL players from NHL players. This deal and the Garret Sparks/Curtis McIlhinney debacle are two egregious examples in two years.