Analyzing Dubas's Performance - III

Status
Not open for further replies.
If Dubas gave 1/10th of the performance in the office as what Kadri is doing for the AVs right now, we would, we would probably still have Kadri. Nevermind.
 
Again, he's a more viable NHL asset than Marchment, which is all that matters here. He has way more NHL games at a younger age.

Because we were relatively healthy at that point and didn't need him. Marchment wouldn't have come any closer to doing anything, so who cares? He wasn't brought in to be the answer in the playoffs. He was an improvement on the thing we gave up. That's it. Every transaction is not going to be the ultimate solution. GMs are allowed to make minor deals.

These Lindholm/Marchment and Petan/Malgin deals aren't impactful but the concern is the Leafs have many weaknesses even in depth positions that don't seem to be addressed. Like adequate goaltending depth for the year and a half before Campbell, or why they had to resort to Martin Marincin for the nth time.
 
To be fair, Mackinnon didn't fully put things together until his 5th NHL season.
Right but you knew he was going to. A lot of that was talent around him. MitchMarner and willienylander ain’t never going to try like he does. I don’t it’s in their DNA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GirardSpinorama
The guy is 28 years old, has barely 100 NHL games under his belt, 2/3rds of them are with the Leafs and has shown zero ability to be a consistent above average PKer in this league (despite being a "specialist" in it) . Seems like a definition of "medicore" as far as an NHL career.

The Bruins needed a cheap depth player and he was lucky to get that opportunity. They're not going to wear down all of their stars on the PK, hence they give some spots to the depth guys like Par.
Because you say so? You also said Petan could be a reclamation project yet he clearly doesn’t think the game at an NHL level so that was never happening.

Lucky? No, you don’t luck into an NHL contract with a Stanley Cup contender, you earn it. Nobody finds themselves in an NHL playoff game on a count of luck. That line of thinking is so incredibly out of touch with reality.

Rather than acknowledge it was a small but stupid move you’d prefer to defend, deflect and discredit.
 
Right but you knew he was going to. A lot of that was talent around him. MitchMarner and willienylander ain’t never going to try like he does. I don’t it’s in their DNA.

Actually to be fair to Nylander and Marner, Mackinnon wasn't going anywhere and the Avalanche were in pure disarray as late as 2017, and had only had one great rookie year in Colorado. Marner and Nylander have been part of a much more successful program for the first few years of their careers. That isn't to say I think Marner or Nylander have a hidden Mackinnon gear though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menzinger
Because you say so? You also said Petan could be a reclamation project yet he clearly doesn’t think the game at an NHL level so that was never happening.

Lucky? No, you don’t luck into an NHL contract with a Stanley Cup contender, you earn it. Nobody finds themselves in an NHL playoff game on a count of luck. That line of thinking is so incredibly out of touch with reality.

Rather than acknowledge it was a small but stupid move you’d prefer to defend, deflect and discredit.

Because he's never shown on any nhl team he's played for to be a consistent above average PKer....

He was lucky in the sense the Bruins didn't have anyone better on their depth chart to slot into the lineup ahead of him in that spot because hes an easily replaceable player.

Brett Lebda played on a cup winning team. It didn't mean he was anything more than a mediocre player
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beleafer34
Actually to be fair to Nylander and Marner, Mackinnon wasn't going anywhere and the Avalanche were in pure disarray as late as 2017, and had only had one great rookie year in Colorado. Marner and Nylander have been part of a much more successful program for the first few years of their careers. That isn't to say I think Marner or Nylander have a hidden Mackinnon gear though.

People were fairly critical of him as I can remember. There were defiantly a handful of (very stupid) mainbaords threads debating if he was a disappointment for a #1 or even bust lol
 
People were fairly critical of him as I can remember. There were defiantly a handful of (very stupid) mainbaords threads debating if he was a disappointment for a #1 or even bust lol
World Cup or whatever the hell they named it was really his coming out party. A lot of people felt his head/hands didn't match his feet up to that point. He had an okay year after it then broke out
 
Because you say so? You also said Petan could be a reclamation project yet he clearly doesn’t think the game at an NHL level so that was never happening.

Lucky? No, you don’t luck into an NHL contract with a Stanley Cup contender, you earn it. Nobody finds themselves in an NHL playoff game on a count of luck. That line of thinking is so incredibly out of touch with reality.

Rather than acknowledge it was a small but stupid move you’d prefer to defend, deflect and discredit.

You're just ignoring the facts. He was pedestrian in his role in Toronto. He was outplayed by Moore and lost his roster spot. He really showed no reason for the Leafs to hang onto him, and as a 13th forward he's quite replaceable.
 
These Lindholm/Marchment and Petan/Malgin deals aren't impactful but the concern is the Leafs have many weaknesses even in depth positions that don't seem to be addressed. Like adequate goaltending depth for the year and a half before Campbell
So... you're trying to use these trades as a mark against Dubas because your issue is something else entirely that's already been addressed...?

Also, it wasn't a year and a half. Sparks through the beginning of February was 7-3-1, with a 0.909 SV%. He dropped off in the last month and a half, but Hutchinson was serviceable in 2018-2019 as well; putting up a 0.914 SV% with us. I can understand people wanting something done in that offseason, but that's half of a year, and there weren't many possible options within our price range.
or why they had to resort to Martin Marincin for the nth time.
Because Muzzin got injured... The hate for Marincin is weird. What do people expect out of a #7-8 defenseman?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menzinger
Because he's never shown on any nhl team he's played for to be a consistent above average PKer....

He was lucky in the sense the Bruins didn't have anyone better on their depth chart to slot into the lineup Head of him in that spot because hes an easily replaceable player
You’re underselling him, but that’s fine. Let’s pretend you’re right - Do you think an average NHL PK’er and depth option is more valuable than an AHL player for a team hoping to make an NHL playoff run?

The Bruins signed Lindholm as a free agent and added him to a roster they hope to contend with. I’m not sure why you have to downplay that? He isn’t lucky, he’s worked his ass off for 20+ years to make himself a viable NHL depth option.
 
You're just ignoring the facts. He was pedestrian in his role in Toronto. He was outplayed by Moore and lost his roster spot. He really showed no reason for the Leafs to hang onto him, and as a 13th forward he's quite replaceable.
In your opinion, you mean.

The point is they lost Kadri to suspension and could have really used a depth centreman but didn’t have one because Dubas traded him for a minor leaguer. While he certainly isn’t a 3rd liner, he can keep up with better players far more effectively than Freddy Gauthier.

The Leafs centre depth was terrible. Trading a depth centreman for an AHL winger makes absolutely no sense to anyone unless you’re just blindly trying to defend the decisions of Kyle Dubas.
 
In your opinion, you mean.

The point is they lost Kadri to suspension and could have really used a depth centreman but didn’t have one because Dubas traded him for a minor leaguer. While he certainly isn’t a 3rd liner, he can keep up with better players far more effectively than Freddy Gauthier.

The Leafs centre depth was terrible. Trading a depth centreman for an AHL winger makes absolutely no sense to anyone unless you’re just blindly trying to defend the decisions of Kyle Dubas.
I'm lost who is the AHL winger? Minor Leaguer?
 
I'm lost who is the AHL winger? Minor Leaguer?
Nic Petan.

It was a minor deal but speaks more to the thought process of the GM. If I trade you a toonie for a loonie it’s not really a big deal, but you’d walk away wondering if I understand how money works.

I walk away wondering if Dubas can differentiate AHL players from NHL players. This deal and the Garret Sparks/Curtis McIlhinney debacle are two egregious examples in two years.
 
Nic Petan.

It was a minor deal but speaks more to the thought process of the GM. If I trade you a toonie for a loonie it’s not really a big deal, but you’d walk away wondering if I understand how money works.

I walk away wondering if Dubas can differentiate AHL players from NHL players. This deal and the Garret Sparks/Curtis McIlhinney debacle are two egregious examples in two years.
He was a pending free agent we could have signed a few months later.

This wasn't about thinking Petan was simply better, it's about asset management. Losing a player who isn't on your playoff projected roster? Isn't even your 13th forward? Move him for a longer term option. If you need him back, you could sign him or a similar player
 
People were fairly critical of him as I can remember. There were defiantly a handful of (very stupid) mainbaords threads debating if he was a disappointment for a #1 or even bust lol

I think Mackinnon actually said on Spittin' Chiclets that he was afraid to become a bust. So he decided to become a God...
 
He was a pending free agent we could have signed a few months later.

This wasn't about thinking Petan was simply better, it's about asset management. Losing a player who isn't on your playoff projected roster? Isn't even your 13th forward? Move him for a longer term option. If you need him back, you could sign him or a similar player
Yes, but you can’t sign him in the playoffs in the event of injury or suspension. Most GM’s understand you’re going to use more than 12 forwards if you go anywhere in the playoffs. Petan is 25-26 year old AHL player... is that really an asset?

If you’re packing for a potentially long road trip, would you trade your spare tire for a lawn ornament?
 
So... you're trying to use these trades as a mark against Dubas because your issue is something else entirely that's already been addressed...?

Also, it wasn't a year and a half. Sparks through the beginning of February was 7-3-1, with a 0.909 SV%. He dropped off in the last month and a half, but Hutchinson was serviceable in 2018-2019 as well; putting up a 0.914 SV% with us. I can understand people wanting something done in that offseason, but that's half of a year, and there weren't many possible options within our price range.

Because Muzzin got injured... The hate for Marincin is weird. What do people expect out of a #7-8 defenseman?

This is a Dubas discussion, so we're just sitting around talking about Dubas moves. At best, it's a nothing, at worst, it's adding to a useless collection of tweener forwards who can't play while ignoring other positions.

The point about Marincin being used as a 7th defenseman isn't a comment about Marincin himself but moreso the fact that he's been floundering in his role for 2015-16 but because management hasn't really made very many moves to shore up the defensive depth of the team, we had to use him. Typically playoff teams will go and grab defensive depth at the deadline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beleafer34
Nic Petan.

It was a minor deal but speaks more to the thought process of the GM. If I trade you a toonie for a loonie it’s not really a big deal, but you’d walk away wondering if I understand how money works.

I walk away wondering if Dubas can differentiate AHL players from NHL players. This deal and the Garret Sparks/Curtis McIlhinney debacle are two egregious examples in two years.
Oh ok. Thanks.

I'll say Dubas is being judged on building a team of 3 11m forwards and little defence. That's what he is basing his career on and the crux of his tenure for better or worse.

The minor deals were gambles that are easy to make and recover from, with late round pick trades or signings. Look at Ennis or Spezza or Mikheyev.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad