They+are=they're
When speaking of an object or a place.....there...
Did you really..
They+are=they're
When speaking of an object or a place.....there...
Klefbom plus 2017 1st(unprotected) for Lindholm?Much rather make a Trouba deal than giving the Oilers a player like Lindholm. With McDavid on that team, don't expect other teams to give really good pieces without you giving up something better in return (Hall for Larsson).
Klefbom plus 2017 1st(unprotected) for Lindholm?
I'm not sure Anaheim does this even if the Jets add Laine. You don't trade Hampus unless you try to tank.
Lindholm and Trouba are very comparable. L only outscored T by 7 points with playing more pp time on the top ranked pp on the league. T actually outscored L at even strength this past season.
And they say Winnipeg fans over rate their players.
Canadiens offer Gallagher (great contract value)+ (Beaulieu, Pateryn, etc) for Lindholm. I know value is off for habs but this decreases the D logjam in ANA and gives the habs a good duo with Weber.
Yes, I know Lindholm is the last D to get traded by the Ducks because of how good he is, but say he wants out, would a Gallagher proposal be good enough for the Ducks?
Would ducks fans have a heart attack if this were to happen?
Habs don't have what it takes to get Lindholm unless it's Price. Gallagher is nowhere near good enough to be the main peace
most likely on gallagher not being enough but the habs have more than just Price and Price is an ez no.
Patches + top prospect +DP
But MTL already had their 1D I don't see them being interested in gutting the team for another
They+are=they're
When speaking of an object or a place.....there...
Much rather make a Trouba deal than giving the Oilers a player like Lindholm. With McDavid on that team, don't expect other teams to give really good pieces without you giving up something better in return (Hall for Larsson).
Patches + top prospect +DP
But MTL already had their 1D I don't see them being interested in gutting the team for another
But for right now, nothing of the sort has come out. The word Lindholm said translated out as "economical" in Google (which I understand isn't completely reliable ), while "skambud" translated as "lowball bids". This means either:Unless both players don't want to play for their respective teams.
If Trouba would prefer to sit out, then Wpg might be motivated to trade him in a deal in which they don't "win" the trade.
I recently read that Lindholm called the ducks "cheap" so there's the possibility he might want out. So while Wpg fans think that Trouba = Lindholm and Ana fans think that Lindholm > Trouba, perhaps some sort of deal with some kind of add on Wpg's side work, or as a previous poster mentioned, Wpg could also pickup a bad Ana contract in the trade.
To me the add is the tricky part, as Ana fans wants it to be an "A" forward like Ehlers or an "A" prospect like "Conner" but Wpg fans think it should be a "B" player like Lowry or a "B" prospect like Petan.
lol no way btw whos DP?