gojetsgo
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2015
- 11,804
- 34,173
Our guardian angel is watching out for us...jets offered Henrique 2x$3.5M according to dreger
Schiefele isn't better than BarkovScheifele is better than barkov
Trading Ehlers has to come with a dman in return and nobody good is available so you better off keeping ehlers and run with Lambert at 2c.
Schiefele isn't better than Barkov
Barkov is the best 2 way centre in the game
Think Schiefele, but with Lowry's shut down skills in the same package
Yup, Barkov is a top 5 C in the game today. I'd be hard pressed to place Scheifele in the top 20 at this stage of his career.
I'm not so sure... It might be better than Dillon-Pionk, and the Jets won the Jennings trophy last season with that 2nd pair.Samberg-Pionk is going to be the worst 2nd pairing the league. We absolutely need Heinola to be a breakout player.
Scheif is still a top 20 center in the league easily. Top 10 for sure not but that group is pretty hard to get into.
We just came off a season where we finished 4th overall its hard to imagine that he isn't one of the better centers in the league. I think what is going to hurt him and the Jets is getting someone behind him.
I dunnoScheif is still a top 20 center in the league easily. Top 10 for sure not but that group is pretty hard to get into.
We just came off a season where we finished 4th overall its hard to imagine that he isn't one of the better centers in the league. I think what is going to hurt him and the Jets is getting someone behind him.
Scheifele is a top-performing C when he isn't playing with Connor, because together they give up too much defensively. When Scheifele has been with Ehlers they put up stellar results. I think that if the coaches use Scheifele effectively, he can drive good results.Scheif is still a top 20 center in the league easily. Top 10 for sure not but that group is pretty hard to get into.
We just came off a season where we finished 4th overall its hard to imagine that he isn't one of the better centers in the league. I think what is going to hurt him and the Jets is getting someone behind him.
Sample size was only 150 minutes for Snerg - Pionk but hopefully it holds upI'm not so sure... It might be better than Dillon-Pionk, and the Jets won the Jennings trophy last season with that 2nd pair.
View attachment 891366
I'm really glad he rejected the Jets.jets offered Henrique 2x$3.5M according to dreger
florida with 3 what?Florida with 3 in the top 30, Edmonton with 2...NYR with two, Hintz and Johnston could be considered top 30... better hope Lambert is who we want him to be
We were more than a playoff team with him centering that line for a long stretch last season.I agree on the Monahan deal. Would have liked him back but nowhere near that length. Does anyone really think were a playoff team with Namestnikov centering our 2nd line??
I wanted Dillon to sign as our 3rd pairing with Heinola on his off-side... but that was when Miller didn't seem like an optionSample size was only 150 minutes for Snerg - Pionk but hopefully it holds up
People wanted Dillon to re-sign, but I think we're very close to a point (if not past it) where Samberg's upward trajectory intersects with Dillon's downward trajectory. I think he'll grow into the 2LHD role well
I think all the red boxes on that graph - where literally everyone on the team is way better without Pionk - are much more telling than the handful of minutes that Samberg had the illusion of outperforming Dillon. Pionk is garbage.I'm not so sure... It might be better than Dillon-Pionk, and the Jets won the Jennings trophy last season with that 2nd pair.
View attachment 891366
I agree that Pionk is not suitable for a 2nd pair role, but somehow the Jets had the best goals against performance with him in that role next season. I think Miller would probably be better.I think all the red boxes on that graph - where literally everyone on the team is way better without Pionk - are much more telling than the handful of minutes that Samberg had the illusion of outperforming Dillon. Pionk is garbage.