A1LeafNation
Good, is simply not good enough!
- Oct 17, 2010
- 27,967
- 18,245
Exactly. There is nothing else to it. Anybody seeing it any other way is underhandedHonestly, why not? If the Leafs keep winning, and the games stay as close as they have been, he's obviously trusted to kill off those final minutes.
I've never understood the slander against EN goals. It means the coach wants you out there, and you have the puck despite being down a man.
This is a specious argument. you ignored everything else I said.You really think it's possible he keeps scoring empty net goals at a rate of 2 goals every 7 games? Really?
Honestly, why not? If the Leafs keep winning, and the games stay as close as they have been, he's obviously trusted to kill off those final minutes.
I've never understood the slander against EN goals. It means the coach wants you out there, and you have the puck despite being down a man.
Bolded is obviously true, no one can question that finishing that play is significantly easier (literally just hit the net). But the build up to that play is often more difficult (hence why a player as amazing as Bure could only manage 9 in one season).Seems almost impossible but your optimism in this regard does make me wonder what the record is for most empty net goals in a season by a single player. I do suspect it's well below 24 which is what he currently projects to over 82 games. I mean come on, 24 empty net goals? I'd guess the current record is under 10.
OK I just looked it up, Pavel Bure holds the record with 9 EN goals in one season. Yeah looks like I was right, it's not realistic to expect Marner to keep up the 24 RN goal pace for very long.
I wouldn't say slander but of course scoring on an empty net is nowhere near as difficult as scoring on a goalie.
Marner is one of the highest paid players in the world, he damn well better be one of the players the coach wants out there in any situation.
This is a specious argument. you ignored everything else I said.
Just find some little explanation to slam the kid and explain away his performance.
Here is a hint...the great ones get a fair share of ENG including OVI, and Marner is a better puck retriever.
In 1999-2000, Bure put up 9 of them. Such a lucky player.Honestly, why not? If the Leafs keep winning, and the games stay as close as they have been, he's obviously trusted to kill off those final minutes.
I've never understood the slander against EN goals. It means the coach wants you out there, and you have the puck despite being down a man.
Bolded is obviously true, no one can question that finishing that play is significantly easier (literally just hit the net). But the build up to that play is often more difficult (hence why a player as amazing as Bure could only manage 9 in one season).
You're right, current pace is unrealistic. But the rate at which the Leafs' are heading into the final minute with a 1 goal lead is also probably higher than you'd expect. Every game this year has been tight either way, causing a lot of empty nets (on both sides).
Marner is playing well this year, a whole lot better than last year, but I still haven't been blown away by him at ES. Pretty happy with his PK'ing and closing out games, and you can't beat his PP production, but he's still not driving play at evens very well. His metrics are all pretty weak at 5on5.
I'm certainly not worried about him, he's miles better than he was last year, but he's not at the point yet where I'm back to fawning over his every move.
The top line has looked off to me all season, but that's okay as long as they get it together for the playoffs.
This team really needs an eighth top-9 forward. Right now we're Matthews, Tavares, Marner, Nylander, Kerfoot, Hyman, Mikheyev deep and then a bunch of fringe NHL'ers. Another quality forward would help a lot.
With 2-3 minutes left in game Mitch was skating back at his own blue line with Flames in possession ... it was a 3 on 3 situation ... then Mitch lets his man go and for some unknown reason circles at blue line where Flames got a great high danger chance on resulting 3 on 2 ... clearly Matty was caught up ice and Mitch has to play centre in that situation and stay with opposing centre ... but he didn't he peeled off hoping to get quick breakout pass up ice on attack in a game we are winning 3-2 ... to me that says all you need to say to ur teammates first and then fans ... that is exactly what needs to change and fast ...I don’t care how many points he gets or how he gets them. He has to play defensively aware and I'm good. He’s the Nhl leading scorer for another day. I just know that motivates him just like it motivates McDavid. I don’t want him solely transfixed on offense like McDavid. He’s already plays a better defensive game than him but needs to continue widening the gap defensively.
Marner does loads of great nifty things offensively and is improving defensively.
He might win a scoring title or two in his career.
I was cursing him on that. You can’t do that. I don’t know what that was. It’s infuriating to me. Keefe likely wasn’t very happy with many players yesterday. I see the win but it’s nit a reason to ignore the crap misplays. Yes they need fixing fast. I seen it too and pretty much came unglued haWith 2-3 minutes left in game Mitch was skating back at his own blue line with Flames in possession ... it was a 3 on 3 situation ... then Mitch lets his man go and for some unknown reason circles at blue line where Flames got a great high danger chance on resulting 3 on 2 ... clearly Matty was caught up ice and Mitch has to play centre in that situation and stay with opposing centre ... but he didn't he peeled off hoping to get quick breakout pass up ice on attack in a game we are winning 3-2 ... to me that says all you need to say to ur teammates first and then fans ... that is exactly what needs to change and fast ...
I was cursing him on that. You can’t do that. I don’t know what that was. It’s infuriating to me. Keefe likely wasn’t very happy with many players yesterday. I see the win but it’s nit a reason to ignore the crap misplays. Yes they need fixing fast. I seen it too and pretty much came unglued ha
Yeah but I don’t. He’s great lots and stupid sometimes too.Careful now, you may get grief for "hating" on the kid.![]()
I agreeThis is a specious argument. you ignored everything else I said.
Just find some little explanation to slam the kid and explain away his performance.
Here is a hint...the great ones get a fair share of ENG including OVI, and Marner is a better puck retriever.
Lol trueI agree
He is in the right place to score those goals.
Some people just can't enjoy they need to bitch .
Wait till we get there .Impressive start to the season but he needs to bring it in the playoffs for me to get over last year and the salary. Against a team like Montreal I fear he'd get bodied.
EN points aside, his underlying numbers are not abnormal or particularly "lucky". One could just as easily say he's been unlucky, as every single one of his points has been a primary point.He's been pretty lucky so far this season.
Impressive start to the season but he needs to bring it in the playoffs for me to get over last year and the salary. Against a team like Montreal I fear he'd get bodied.
Wouldn't you agree that Marner is off to a better start compared to last season?He's been pretty lucky so far this season. If I'm not mistaken, two of his 4 goals are empty netters, it's obvious he can't keep up that pace for an entire season and the two assists last night were nothing spectacular for sure considering how fluky the goals themselves were. Not hating on the kid or anything (though I do think he's overpaid) but his point producing pace after 7 games doesn't mean much.
How much of that was Matthews and Marner adjusting to playing with Thornton instead of Hyman?The top line has looked off to me all season, but that's okay as long as they get it together for the playoffs.
This team really needs an eighth top-9 forward. Right now we're Matthews, Tavares, Marner, Nylander, Kerfoot, Hyman, Mikheyev deep and then a bunch of fringe NHL'ers. Another quality forward would help a lot.