Rumor: ALL PURPOSE JT MILLER THREAD PT2 - It's Been 84 Years....

IslandersFan17

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
5,799
1,332
Long Island
You could also make a case that if Miller starts the season hot, and some teams / players come slow out the gate, the trade offers for Miller might increase as well. It could of course go the other way too, but the market for Miller definitely changes as the season progresses.
That’s fair
 

zcaptain

Registered User
Apr 4, 2012
1,559
530
Here is one for you.........................

Washington.........Eller(Cap dump), McMichaels, Iorio, 2022-1st, 2023-2nd
for
Vancouver.............Miller 50% retained and Hoglander, and 2023-3rd
 

Tob

Registered User
Sep 16, 2017
16,743
37,451
I don't know if it's a useful exercise or a fair way to think about the flat cap and acquisition cost this way but say you are Tom Fitzgerald and you have 2 proposals on tap a month ago.

Ty Smith+3rd for Marino (5YRSX4.4M) and 3rd+4th for Bjornstrand (4YRSX5.4M). Or you have something that the Canucks are asking for 2023 1st, roster player, top prospect which for the sake of argument I will go with 2023 NJD 1st, Haula, and Holtz (Haula is meh but Holtz is a good pick up so I am sticking with that to balance out the value,). Miller comes with a Mika Zibanejad or F.Forsberg type extention is place. He is 2 years older so 6YRSX$8.5M which I think is a very fair end of day contract, it could even be 7 years if the newly acquired player has all the leverage in extension talks.

If you're Fitzgerald, do you go with Bjornstrand (27-30), Marino (25-29) signed throughout their prime at combined $9.8M while giving up Ty Smith, 3rd, 3rd, 4th and retaining 2023 1st, Haula, Holtz or do you go with Miller (30 at $5.5M, 31-36 at $8.5M) while giving up 2023 1st, Haula, Holtz and retaining Ty Smith, 3rd, 3rd, 4th. The extra defenseman you'll need to fill Marino's spot in the Miller route is going to cost another at least $1M in cap so the cap usage washes.

Year 1 with Miller at his prime, age 30 at $5.5M, I would take Miller that year. Year 2 Miller's raise kicks in and the cap between Scenario 1 and 2 is a wash. If Miller is a 90+ point player I would give the win to Miller route assuming Holtz isn't bashing heads in the NHL yet. If in year 3 Miller (age 32) is a 70-80 point player, the overall value of having 2 ELCs ready to help (2023 1st rounder, Holtz) and still in their prime Bjron (29) and Marino (27) may very easily outweight Miller as a 70-80 point player at $8.5M.

There are only going to be more and more of these Marino and Bjornstrand trade opportunities for GMs that have cap space and keep it open until another GM is backed into a corner.

For players in their prime like Fiala and Tkachuk, the acquisition cost can be justified. Miller's value has always had to be a deadline no cap no worries no extension type of a return. unsurprising he didn't go last season or so far. Miller is worth too much to the Canucks' chances next season to simply do what Kyle Davidson is doing when he knows he's tanking and should get the rebuild started ASAP even if the value isn't great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alluckks

AHLdepth

Registered User
Feb 17, 2020
650
914
Would need to be lots of picks/prospects IMO. Retaining and taking on Zucker... Potentially he could have value at TDL if we retained, but still...
I'm thinking in that scenario it would be like

To Pit: Miller @50% + Dickinson + Dipietro

To Van: Zucker (1 year cap dump/reclamation project) + '23 1st + 24 2nd + Poulin + Clang/Blomqvist
 

arttk

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
19,689
11,690
Los Angeles
Lol. Drance really isn’t as bright as he thinks he is.
Not sure what’s the point in predicting trades at this point. If somebody suggested that Calgary or CBJ trade a month ago, everyone would be like that’s insane.
It’s obvious now novody can really predict what the trade market will be like because the returns are completely different than what we are used to.
 

M2Beezy

Objective and Neutral Hockey Commentator
Sponsor
May 25, 2014
46,659
32,638
Palestine 🇵🇸
To Vancouver:

Brett Pesce
Martin Necas
2023 1st

To Carolina:
Miller @ 50%
I think this makes more sense for both sides, as Carolina would be looking for a big d coming back, but its a tight cap world so Canucks fans may not like only getting this back in this deal:

To Vancouver: Pesce, Necas, 2023 1st, 2024 3rd

To Carolina: Miller @50%, Poolman, 2025 5th
 

Joseph Nathan

Registered User
Feb 11, 2022
753
340
I think this makes more sense for both sides, as Carolina would be looking for a big d coming back, but its a tight cap world so Canucks fans may not like only getting this back in this deal:

To Vancouver: Pesce, Necas, 2023 1st, 2024 3rd

To Carolina: Miller @50%, Poolman, 2025 5th
Why would caroline do this? They also don't need a C, or anymore forward. They aren't trading pesce. and they don't pay for rentals

I'm thinking in that scenario it would be like

To Pit: Miller @50% + Dickinson + Dipietro

To Van: Zucker (1 year cap dump/reclamation project) + '23 1st + 24 2nd + Poulin + Clang/Blomqvist
Zucker will not waive for Canada
 

Mal Reynolds

never goes smooth, how come it never goes smooth?
Sep 28, 2008
1,687
611
I think this makes more sense for both sides, as Carolina would be looking for a big d coming back, but its a tight cap world so Canucks fans may not like only getting this back in this deal:

To Vancouver: Pesce, Necas, 2023 1st, 2024 3rd

To Carolina: Miller @50%, Poolman, 2025 5th

That's a very fair and well thought out proposal (as usual)

I *do* have several suggestions however

Big D don't get much bigger than Tyler Myers, so I suggest swapping him for Poolman (and removing the 5th). The Canucks will need to clear cap to give Necas a new contract, and the Canes will need a RHD.

And last but not least, because the Chaos Giraffe is so much better than Poolman that 3rd on Carolina's side should be upgraded to a guy like Scott Morrow.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boom Boom Apathy

StickShift

In a pickle 🥒
Feb 29, 2004
7,494
6,560
New York
Did y'all see this bit of total speculation with a sensationalist title:


:popcorn:
*shrug* it’s the dog days of summer and there isn’t a lot to write about this team. Journalist has gotta get paid to write something.

He’s probably going to write a sensationalist article for each team that could conceivably be a fit for JT Miller and use the most unrealistic asset. Get ready for “Will Columbus finally solve their Kent Johnson problem?” or “Does Colorado finally play their Bowen Byram card this off-season?” as the next articles.
 

spockBokk

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
7,494
18,996
To Vancouver:

Brett Pesce
Martin Necas
2023 1st

To Carolina:
Miller @ 50%

The Canes wouldn’t trade Necas and Pesce for Laine, who had yrs of team control left and you actually think a deal where they add a 1st to that package is feasible for them to take on a rental?

Let’s break this down:

-The Canes wouldn’t trade a 1st last year for a rental, so logic would dictate that that wouldn’t deal a 1st this yr for 1yr of Miller. So even if the deal was a 1st one for one for Miller, the Canes historically will refuse

-To think 1yr of Miller gets you a top 4 RD signed for 2 more years is just delusional thinking, no chance

-The Canes are on record as saying they don’t want to deal Necas. They have all the leverage in his current RFA negotiations and 4 more yrs of team control. Not to mention, Necas is 7yrs younger than Miller. Again, no chance they trade Necas for 1 yr of Miller

So, in conclusion, none of these pieces would be traded on their own for 1yr of Miller, much less all 3. I’d suggest taking this one back to the drawing board, and on a personal note, you might want to start preparing yourself for epic levels of disappointment if you think that package is at all a realistic return.
 
Last edited:

Ararana

Registered User
Sep 22, 2013
18,235
28,901
Two Rivers
*shrug* it’s the dog days of summer and there isn’t a lot to write about this team. Journalist has gotta get paid to write something.

He’s probably going to write a sensationalist article for each team that could conceivably be a fit for JT Miller and use the most unrealistic asset. Get ready for “Will Columbus finally solve their Kent Johnson problem?” or “Does Colorado finally play their Bowen Byram card this off-season?” as the next articles.

Is that the same moron who fabricated the Byram rumors at the deadline and was forced to admit he speculated the entire thing yet wrote it as creditable rumor?
 

IslandersFan17

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
5,799
1,332
Long Island
You mean the pick swap trade of 13th for 15th+? You don’t actually buy the nonsense that a JT Miller trade fell apart on the draft floor, minutes away from the pick being on the clock because Lou wanted to hammer out a contract with JT on the fly, do you?
Nah of course not, but I’ll certainly take the word of a random poster on HFBoards
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad