Buff15Sabres
Registered User
- Mar 23, 2017
- 378
- 435
Does everyone use moneypuck for expected goals for ?
I'm struggling to understand some of these percentages.
Moneypuck says Nashville 4th goal had only a 4.1% chance of scoring. This was a 2 on 1 where the pass got across and the scorer had an open shot from an extremely dangerous area. My gut would've put this well over 50%+ chance of scoring.
Tage's goal was only a 9.2% chance of scoring? How does a cross ice pass on a 5 on 3 that resulted in a perfectly placed rocket into the top corner have that low of a scoring chance ? I'd put that in the unsaveable category.
Many (every?) Nashville goal looks lower than I would've expected. Does moneypuck only look at where a shot is taken from without looking at game situation? IE if it was a clean breakaway, 2 on 1 rush, etc.
I'm struggling to understand some of these percentages.
Moneypuck says Nashville 4th goal had only a 4.1% chance of scoring. This was a 2 on 1 where the pass got across and the scorer had an open shot from an extremely dangerous area. My gut would've put this well over 50%+ chance of scoring.
Tage's goal was only a 9.2% chance of scoring? How does a cross ice pass on a 5 on 3 that resulted in a perfectly placed rocket into the top corner have that low of a scoring chance ? I'd put that in the unsaveable category.
Many (every?) Nashville goal looks lower than I would've expected. Does moneypuck only look at where a shot is taken from without looking at game situation? IE if it was a clean breakaway, 2 on 1 rush, etc.