WhereAreTheCookies
Registered User
The xGF stats assign the same weight of a missed shot to a blocked shot to a corner snipe. It also doesn't capture shooter talent, so if Ovie and Girgensons take the exact same shot, it carries the exact same value.
Anyway, a shot that occurs when a pass immediately precedes it carries a much heavier xGF value than just a shot event. So in many cases a breakaway will have a lower xGF value than a rebound or cross slot pass to shot, even substantially so. Two identical 2-on-1's can have substantially different xGF values depending on where the shot was taken and whether there was a pass before hand.
That's why sample size is so important, and neither of our goalies have played anywhere near enough minutes for those numbers to meaningful. The best one could say is "so far player x is performing above/below expectations", with the caveat that there are no real conclusions to be made yet.
Remember Hammond's magical run with the Sens? Sample size...
I'm not looking at those numbers as the end all be all of how good or bad the goalies are like some on here seemed to imply. But would anyone argue that the goalie order of how good they've been has been Anderson>UPL>Comrie so far this season? Which is what the xGA was suggesting. Ignore the data altogether and view it as a ranking, does it line up?